skip to main content
10.1145/3003733.3003743acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Usability of Visibly Adaptive Smartphone keyboard layouts

Published:10 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present two touchscreen smartphone keyboard interface designs which dynamically alter key sizes as the user types and highlight likely key targets, based on word completion predictions. Although we find a speed reduction and no accuracy advantage with these methods over standard QWERTY, the text entry experience on mobile devices with these designs is significantly better for users.

References

  1. Khaldoun Al Faraj, Mustapha Mojahid and Nadine Vigouroux. 2009. BigKey: A Virtual Keyboard for Mobile Devices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3--10. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-02580-8_1 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Vimala Balakrishnan and H. P. Paul. 2008. A study of the effect of thumb sizes on mobile phone texting satisfaction. J. Usability Studies 3, 3, 118--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Tyler Baldwin and Joyce Chai. 2012. Towards online adaptation and personalization of key-target resizing for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--20. DOI:10.1145/2166966.2166969 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fitts 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of experimental psychology. 47, 6 (1954), 381Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kentaro Go and Yuki Endo. 2007. CATKey: customizable and adaptable touchscreen keyboard with bubble cursor-like visual feedback. In Human-Computer Interaction 2007. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 493--496. DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-74796-3_47 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Asela Gunawardana, Tim Paek, and Christopher Meek. 2010. Usability guided key-target resizing for soft keyboards. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 111--118. DOI:10.1145/1719970.1719986 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Johan Himberg, Jonna Häkkilä, Petri Kangas, and Jani Mäntyjärvi. 2003. On-line personalization of a touch screen based keyboard. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 77--84. DOI:10.1145/604045.604061 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jeong Ho Kim, J. H., Lovenoor S. Aulck, Ornwipa Thamsuwan, Michael C. Bartha and Peter W. Johnson. 2014. The effect of key size of touch screen virtual keyboards on productivity, usability, and typing biomechanics. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56(7), 1235--1248. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-39182-8_28 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. I. Scott MacKenzie and Shawn X. Zhang. 1999. The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 25--31. DOI:10.1145/302979.302983 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. I. Scott MacKenzie, Shawn X. Zhang, S. X. and William R. Soukoreff. 1999. Text entry using soft keyboards. Behaviour & information technology, 18 (4), 235-244, DOI:10.1080/014492999118995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tom Page. 2013. Usability of text input interfaces in smartphones. Journal of Design Research, 11(1), 39. DOI:10.1504/jdr.2013.054065 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Élvio Rodrigues, Micael Carreira and Daniel Gonçalves. 2013. Improving Text-Entry Experience on Tablets. In Proceedings of the 5th Portuguese Conference on Human-Machine Interaction. Vila Real, Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Élvio Rodrigues, Micael Carreira and Daniel Gonçalves. 2014. Improving Text-Entry Experience for Older Adults on Tablets. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Aging and Assistive Environments. Springer International Publishing, 167--178. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-07446-7_17 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Andrew Sears, Doreen Revis, Janet Swatski, Rob Crittenden and Ben Shneiderman. 1993. Investigating touchscreen typing: the effect of keyboard size on typing speed. Behaviour & Information Technology, 12(1), 17--22. DOI: 10.1080/01449299308924362 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Usability of Visibly Adaptive Smartphone keyboard layouts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PCI '16: Proceedings of the 20th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
      November 2016
      449 pages
      ISBN:9781450347891
      DOI:10.1145/3003733

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 November 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader