skip to main content
10.1145/3003819.3003821acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A generic dual grid pruning approach for significant hotspot detection

Published:31 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Given a set of points in two dimensional space, statistically significant hotspot detection aims to detect locations where the concentration of points inside the hotspot is much higher than outside. Statistically significant hotspot detection is an important task in application domains such as epidemiology, ecology, criminology, etc. where it may reveal interesting information for domain experts. However, significant hotspot detection is challenging because of a lack of a generic technique for different hotspot patterns (i.e. shapes) and thus a large number of candidate hotspots to be enumerated and tested. Previous hotspot detection techniques focus on specific shapes (e.g. circles, rectangles, ellipses) to identify hotspot areas, but they cannot be used interchangeably which cause a vast variety of complicated and sometimes confusing techniques for each individual hotspot pattern. For example, a circular hotspot detection technique can not be used to discover a rectangular or an elliptical hotspot. In this paper, we propose a generic dual grid based pruning approach for hotspot detection that can be used for different hotspot patterns. We also present a cost analysis, a simplified experiment on the dataset size and a case study on a synthetic dataset to show the applicability of our proposed approach to circular hotspots.

References

  1. E. Eftelioglu, S. Shekhar, et al. Ring-shaped hotspot detection: a summary of results. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 815--820. IEEE, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. E. Eftelioglu, X. Tang, and S. Shekhar. Geographically robust hotspot detection: A summary of results. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW), pages 1447--1456. IEEE, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Illingworth and J. Kittler. A survey of the hough transform. Computer vision, graphics, and image processing, 44(1):87--116, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Kulldorff. A spatial scan statistic. Communications in Statistics-Theory and methods, 26:1481--1496, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Kulldorff. Satscan user guide for version 9.0, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. B. Neill and A. W. Moore. A fast multi-resolution method for detection of significant spatial disease clusters. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Shekhar et al. Identifying patterns in spatial information: A survey of methods. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(3):193, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A generic dual grid pruning approach for significant hotspot detection

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SIGSPATIAL PhD '16: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL PhD Symposium
        October 2016
        22 pages
        ISBN:9781450345842
        DOI:10.1145/3003819

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 October 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader