ABSTRACT
Identifying the interactions between drugs and targets is a crucial step in the process of discovering new drugs. There has been a number of computational methods proposed for the problem. Among them, machine learning-based methods usually utilizes the similarity between drugs and between targets to build kernel matrices, which are used to predict novel drug-target interactions with classification models. While network-based methods usually formulate the prediction as a ranking problem where candidate targets are according to a drug of interest and/or its known targets. A common disadvantage of the network-based methods is that they mainly look for novel targets which are close to known targets in the network. In this study, we proposed a method, namely SigTarget, to overcome this limitation. More specifically, SigTarget ranks candidate targets based on a probability with which they connect to known targets by choosing significant links between known and candidate targets. This method was adapted from an algorithm calculating relative importance between nodes in a network. Simulation results show that SigTarget was better than some existing methods such as TBSI, DBSI and RWR for a set of drugs collected from KEGG database. In addition, we showed the ability of SigTarget in predicting novel drug targets by showing that highly ranked candidate targets obtained from SigTarget are also verified in another drug database, DrugBank.
- D. J. Ward, O. I. Martino, S. Simpson, and A. J. Stevens, Decline in new drug launches: myth or reality? Retrospective observational study using 30 years of data from the UK, BMJ Open, vol. 3, no. 2, January 1, 2013, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Sertkaya, H.-H. Wong, A. Jessup, and T. Beleche, Key cost drivers of pharmaceutical clinical trials in the United States, Clinical Trials, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 117--126, April 1, 2016, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Hay, D. W. Thomas, J. L. Craighead, C. Economides, and J. Rosenthal, Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs, Nat Biotech, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 40--51, 01//print, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D.-H. Le, and L. Le, Systems Pharmacology: A Unified Framework for Prediction of Drug-Target Interactions, Current pharmaceutical design, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 3569--3575, 2016, 2016.Google Scholar
- Y. Yamanishi, M. Araki, A. Gutteridge, W. Honda, and M. Kanehisa, Prediction of drug-target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces, Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. i232--i240, July 1, 2008, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J.-L. Faulon, M. Misra, S. Martin, K. Sale, and R. Sapra, Genome scale enzyme-metabolite and drug-target interaction predictions using the signature molecular descriptor, Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 225--233, January 15, 2008, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Jacob, and J.-P. Vert, Protein-ligand interaction prediction: an improved chemogenomics approach, Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 19, pp. 2149--2156, October 1, 2008, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Yabuuchi, S. Niijima, H. Takematsu, T. Ida, T. Hirokawa, T. Hara, T. Ogawa, Y. Minowa, G. Tsujimoto, and Y. Okuno, Analysis of multiple compound-protein interactions reveals novel bioactive molecules, Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2011-01-01 00:00:00, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Campillos, M. Kuhn, A.-C. Gavin, L. J. Jensen, and P. Bork, Drug Target Identification Using Side-Effect Similarity, Science, vol. 321, no. 5886, pp. 263--266, July 11, 2008, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Yamanishi, M. Kotera, M. Kanehisa, and S. Goto, Drug-target interaction prediction from chemical, genomic and pharmacological data in an integrated framework, Bioinformatics, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. i246--i254, June 15, 2010, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Mousavian, and A. Masoudi-Nejad, Drug-target interaction prediction via chemogenomic space: learning-based methods, Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1273--1287, 2014/09/01, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Ding, I. Takigawa, H. Mamitsuka, and S. Zhu, Similarity-based machine learning methods for predicting drug-target interactions: a brief review, Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 734--747, September 1, 2014, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Chen, C. C. Yan, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, F. Dai, J. Yin, and Y. Zhang, Drug-target interaction prediction: databases, web servers and computational models, Briefings in Bioinformatics, August 17, 2015, 2015.Google Scholar
- D.-H. Le, and Y.-K. Kwon, GPEC: A Cytoscape plug-in for random walk-based gene prioritization and biomedical evidence collection, Computational Biology and Chemistry, vol. 37, no. 0, pp. 17--23, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D.-H. Le, and Y.-K. Kwon, Neighbor-favoring weight reinforcement to improve random walk-based disease gene prioritization, Computational Biology and Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 0, pp. 1--8, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D.-H. Le, A novel method for identifying disease associated protein complexes based on functional similarity protein complex networks, Algorithms for Molecular Biology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 14, 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D.-H. Le, Network-based ranking methods for prediction of novel disease associated microRNAs, Computational Biology and Chemistry, vol. 58, pp. 139--148, 10//, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Cheng, C. Liu, J. Jiang, W. Lu, W. Li, G. Liu, W. Zhou, J. Huang, and Y. Tang, Prediction of Drug-Target Interactions and Drug Repositioning via Network-Based Inference, PLoS Comput Biol, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. e1002503, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Wang, C. K. Chang, H.-I. Yang, and Y. Chen, Estimating the Relative Importance of Nodes in Social Networks, Journal of Information Processing, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 414--422, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Kanehisa, S. Goto, M. Furumichi, M. Tanabe, and M. Hirakawa, KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. suppl 1, pp. D355--D360, January 1, 2010, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. S. Wishart, C. Knox, A. C. Guo, D. Cheng, S. Shrivastava, D. Tzur, B. Gautam, and M. Hassanali, DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, no. suppl 1, pp. D901--D906, January 1, 2008, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Hattori, N. Tanaka, M. Kanehisa, and S. Goto, SIMCOMP/SUBCOMP: chemical structure search servers for network analyses, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. suppl 2, pp. W652--W656, July 1, 2010, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. S. Keshava Prasad, R. Goel, K. Kandasamy, S. Keerthikumar, S. Kumar, S. Mathivanan, D. Telikicherla, R. Raju, B. Shafreen, and A. Venugopal, Human protein reference database-2009 update, Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 37, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. D. Bader, D. Betel, and C. W. V. Hogue, BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 248--250, January 1, 2003, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B.-J. Breitkreutz, C. Stark, T. Reguly, L. Boucher, A. Breitkreutz, M. Livstone, R. Oughtred, D. H. Lackner, J. Bahler, V. Wood, K. Dolinski, and M. Tyers, The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2008 update, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, no. suppl_1, pp. D637--640, January 11, 2008, 2008.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Significant path selection improves the prediction of novel drug-target interactions
Recommendations
Reverse tracking from drug-induced transcriptomes through multilayer molecular networks reveals hidden drug targets
AbstractIdentifying molecular targets of a drug is an essential process for drug discovery and development. The recent in-silico approaches are usually based on the structure information of chemicals and proteins. However, 3D structure information is ...
Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted
Highlights- Drug targets cause gene transcriptional change after drug treatment through molecular processes.
- Reverse tracking from genes to proteins in the multilayer network finds drug targets.
- The model shows better performance in predicting ...
Supervised prediction of drug–target interactions using bipartite local models
Motivation: In silico prediction of drug–target interactions from heterogeneous biological data is critical in the search for drugs for known diseases. This problem is currently being attacked from many different points of view, a strong indication ...
Systems pharmacology-based drug discovery and active mechanism of natural products for coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19): An example using flavonoids
Abstract BackgroundRecently, the value of natural products has been extensively considered because these resources can potentially be applied to prevent and treat coronavirus pneumonia 2019 (COVID-19). However, the discovery of ...
Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted
Highlights- Network pharmacology technology was used to elucidate the action mechanism of natural flavonoids against COVID-19.
Comments