skip to main content
10.1145/3012430.3012513acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Coordination in the formation of the transversal skills needed for university-level assignments and support tools for their assessment

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we discuss the need for coordination among the faculty members responsible for the programs of university degrees as regards generic skills training and assessment through the completion of assignments. A map of training activities in the different courses of two undergraduate degrees was prepared, which allowed to detect in what aspects and courses of each of the degrees the continuous training of the students in relation to aforementioned skills needed to be reinforced. In relation to the support tools for the assessment of these skills, an analysis of different plagiarism detection software -compatible with texts in Spanish language- is presented. These actions have been taken in the Environmental Sciences (CCAA) and in the Rural and Agrifood Engineering (IAMR) degrees taught at the Higher Polytechnic School of Huesca (EPSH), at the University of Zaragoza (Spain).

References

  1. González, J., and Wagenaar, R. 2006. Tuning educational structures in Europe. Technical report. Deusto University, Bilbao, Spain. Retrieved September 30, 2016 from http://www.unideusto.org/tuningeu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Navarro, G., Vaccarezza, G., González, M. and Catalán, R. 2015. Construcción de conocimiento en educación superior: Educación de competencias genéricas en la Universidad de Concepción (Chile). Sello editorial Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile, 1--325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Guedea Medrano, I. 2008. Las demandas de las empresas. In Competencias genéricas y transversales de los titulados universitarios. ICE Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 13--18. Retrieved September 30, 2016 from http://www.unizar.es/ice/images/stories/publicacionesICE/Col.%20Documentos%2008.pdfaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mir Acebrón, A. 2008. Las competencias transversales en la Universidad Pompeu Fabra. La visión de los docentes y estudiantes de segundo ciclo.REDU - Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 6(1), 1--16. Retrieved September 30, 2016 from http://red-u.net/redu/index.php/REDU/article/view/57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Torrego, R., and Ruiz, C. 2011. La coordinación docente en la implantación de los títulos de Grado. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 14(4), 31--40. Retrieved September 30, 2016 from http://revistas.um.es/reifop/issue/view/11911.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Montero, M. 2010. El proceso de Bolonia y las nuevas competencias. Tejuelo, 9, 19--37. Retrieved September 30, 2016 from http://tecnologiaedu.us.es/mec2011/htm/mas/3/31/1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Universidad del País Vasco. Guías Docentes de las Competencias Transversales de Grado. Retrieved September 30, 2016 from http://www.ehu.eus/es/web/lan-harremanak/guias-docentes-de-las-competencias-transversales-de-grado#1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Universidad del País Vasco. Competencias Transversales en la Facultad. Retrieved September 30, 2016 from https://www.ehu.eus/es/web/ztf-fct/competencias-transversales.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Universia, Accenture. Las competencias profesionales en los titulados. Contraste y diálogo Universidad-Empresa.Retrieved September 30, 2016 from http://www.unizar.es/ice/images/stories/calidad/EstudioCompleto.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Stuhmcke, A., Booth, T., and Wangmann, J. 2016. The illusory dichotomy of plagiarism. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 41(7), 982--995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ellery, K. 2008. Undergraduate plagiarism: a pedagogical perspective. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 33(5), 507--516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sattler, S., Wiegel, C., and van Veen, F. 2015. The use frequency of 10 different methods for preventing and detecting academic dishonesty and the factors influencing their use. Stud. High. Educ. 0, 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gourlay, L., Deane, J. 2012. Loss, responsibility, blame? Staff discourses of student plagiarism. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 49(1), 19--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mozgovoy, M., Kakkonen, T., and Cosma, G. 2010. Automatic Student Plagiarism Detection: Future Perspectives. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 43, 511--531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Culwin, F. and Lancaster, T. 2000. A review of electronic services for plagiarism detection in student submissions. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on the Teaching of Computing (Edinburgh, UK, July 23--25, 2000). LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Science, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, UK, 23--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lukashenko, R., Graudina, V., and Grundspenkis, J. 2007. Computer-based plagiarism detection methods and tools: an overview. In Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Computer systems and technologies (Rousse, Bulgaria, June 14--15, 2007). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 40:1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Graham-Matheson, L. and Starr, S. 2013. Is it cheating or learning the craft of writing? Using Turnitin to help students avoid plagiarism. Res.Learn. Technol., 21, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Bandi, S., Pothare, D., Angadi, M., and Jange, S. 2016. Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Prevention at Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai: A case Study. In Future Librarianship Innovation for Excellence (Mumbai, India, April 22--23, 2016).Retrieved September 30, 2016 from http://hdl.handle.net/10760/29293.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pai, R. D., and Parmar, S. S. 2015. Electronic plagiarism detection tool: User awareness study. Int. J.Inf. Dissem.Technol. 5(1), 41--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mini, G. P. (2015). Experiences of University Libraries in Kerala with anti-plagiarism softwares iThenticate and Turnitin. In Devarajan et al. (Eds). Blended libraries and information centres: a blueprint for the development of information profession in India. Southern Book Star, Trivandrum, India, 279--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, J. D., and E. F. Page. 2009. An Empirical Research Study of the Efficacy of Two Plagiarism-detection Applications. J. Web Librariansh. 3(3), 169--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Brennan, T. 2015. The Effect of Turnitin.com on Non-Traditional, Graduate Student Awareness, Behavior and Trust. Ph.D. Dissertation, TridentUniversity, Cypress, CA, USA. Pub. number: 3709917.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ewing, H., Anast, A., and Roehling, T. 2016. Addressing plagiarism in online programmes at a health sciences university: a case study. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 41(4), 575--585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Bailey, C., and Challen, R. 2015. Student perceptions of the value of Turnitin text-matching software as a learning tool. Pract. Res. High. Educ. 9(1), 38--51. Retrieved September 30, 2016 from http://194.81.189.19/ojs/index.php/prhe/article/viewFile/217/345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Bruton, S., & Childers, D. (2016). The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism: a qualitative study of faculty views on student plagiarism and Turnitin°. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 41(2), 316--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Coordination in the formation of the transversal skills needed for university-level assignments and support tools for their assessment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        TEEM '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
        November 2016
        1165 pages
        ISBN:9781450347471
        DOI:10.1145/3012430

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 November 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        TEEM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate167of235submissions,71%Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader