skip to main content
10.1145/3012430.3012586acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobile devices as learning tools: present and prospective use by future professionals of education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile devices (MD) are increasingly becoming tools that transcend the playful-communicative function to grow into elements for classroom learning. The benefits of the mobile learning to teaching and learning processes are varied and relevant, but not in all stages of education are they having the same depth and the same perception by students.

With this study we intend to delve into the data described by García-Riaza and Iglesias-Rodríguez [3] to learn in detail about the level of inclusion of mobile devices in university classrooms, as well as the perception of students in the final year of Degree and Master programs in education on these devices and their future use as professionals. To this end, we selected a sample of students from the University of Salamanca to collect data through a questionnaire. These data have been analyzed following a quantitative methodology, a non-experimental method of descriptive type. The data obtained are proof of the positive perception of students towards the MD, of their interest and willingness in managing them in the academic and professional contexts, but also the intuitive component of its actual use and lack of training in the use thereof. With this information, our prospective work is now focused on promoting a greater presence of these devices in university classrooms, as well as increasing the training in the educational use of them.

References

  1. Fundación Orange. 2012. eEspaña. Informe anual 2012 sobre el desarrollo de la Sociedad de la Información en España.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. García-Peñalvo, F. J., and Colomo-Palacios, R. 2015. Innovative teaching methods in Engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(3), 689--693.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. García-Riaza, B., and Iglesias-Rodríguez, A. 2016. Students' Perception of the Integration of Mobile Devices as Learning Tools in Pre-Primary and Primary Teacher Training Degrees. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 7(2). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Iglesias-Rodríguez, A., and García-Riaza, B. 2016. Learning Goes Mobile: Devices and Apps for the Practice of Contents at Tertiary Level. In D. Fonseca and E. Redondo (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Applied E-Learning in Engineering and Architecture Education (472--496). Hershey, PA: Engineering Science Reference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Iglesias, A., and Sánchez, M. (2014). Case study on collaborative Work Experiences with Web 2.0 in Spanish Primary Schools with the Highest Institutional Accreditation Level. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 16(3), 33--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. NMC Horizon Report > 2016 Higher Education Edition. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI) http://www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-horizon-report-2016-higher-education-edition/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ramos, A.I., Herrera, J.A., and Ramírez, M.S. 2009. Desarrollo de habilidades cognitivas con aprendizaje móvil: un estudio de caso. Comunicar, 34, 201--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sabarriego Puig, M., and Bizquerra Alzina, R. 2004. Fundamentos metodológicos de la investigación educativa. In R. Bisquerra Alzina (Coord.), Metodología de la investigación educativa (17-49). Madrid, Spain: La Muralla.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sánchez, M.C., Iglesias, A., and Pedrero, C. 2014. Experiencia innovadora mediante Blended Learning para el trabajo colaborativo en centros de educación primaria. In A.V. Martín García (Coord.), Blended Learning en Educación Superior. Perspectivas de innovación y cambio (161--184). Madrid, Spain: Síntesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sánchez, J. C., Olmos, S., and García-Peñalvo, F. J. 2014b. Mobile Learning Adoption from Informal into Formal: An Extended TAM Model to Measure Mobile Acceptance among Teachers. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM'14 (pp. 595--602). ACM, New York, N.Y., USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Villalonga C., and Marta-Lazo, C. 2015. Educommunicative integration model of mobile "apps" for teaching and learning. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 46. Enero 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mobile devices as learning tools: present and prospective use by future professionals of education

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              TEEM '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
              November 2016
              1165 pages
              ISBN:9781450347471
              DOI:10.1145/3012430

              Copyright © 2016 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 2 November 2016

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              TEEM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate167of235submissions,71%Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader