skip to main content
10.1145/3012709.3012715acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Identification from ceiling: unconstrained person identification for tabletops using multiview learning

Published:12 December 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents novel unconstrained person identification for tabletop systems using a ceiling-mounted depth camera that overlooks a table. Recent state-of-the-art ubicomp, computer-vision, and CSCW studies have tried to recognize a user's activities and actions on a table using a ceiling-mounted device that overlooks the table. However, conventional unconstrained person identification methods such as face identification cannot be used for providing personalized services in such settings. In this study, we focus on a user's soft biometrics that can be captured from the ceiling such as the shoulder length, shape of the head, and posture of the back to achieve unconstrained person identification by using a ceiling-mounted depth camera. We achieve robust person identification by combining the soft biometrics within a framework of multiview learning. Multiview learning allows us to deal effectively with data consisting of features from multiple sources with different data distributions, i.e., multiple soft biometrics in our case. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that investigates the feasibility of person identification for tabletop users by a ceiling-mounted depth camera.

References

  1. Andrea F Abate, Michele Nappi, Daniel Riccio, and Gabriele Sabatino. 2007. 2D and 3D face recognition: A survey. Pattern Recognition Letters 28, 14 (2007), 1885--1906. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. V Ralph Algazi, Richard O Duda, Dennis M Thompson, and Carlos Avendano. 2001. The cipic hrtf database. In IEEE Workshop on the Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics. 99--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ricardo M Araujo, Gustavo Graña, and Virginia Andersson. 2013. Towards skeleton biometric identification using the Microsoft Kinect sensor. In ACM SAC 2013. 21--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Thomas Augsten, Konstantin Kaefer, René Meusel, Caroline Fetzer, Dorian Kanitz, Thomas Stoff, Torsten Becker, Christian Holz, and Patrick Baudisch. 2010. Multitoe: high-precision interaction with back-projected floors based on high-resolution multi-touch input. In UIST 2010. 209--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Paul J Besl and Neil D McKay. 1992. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14, 2 (1992), 239--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Simone Bianco, Gianluigi Ciocca, and Paolo Napoletano. 2014. On the use of MKL for cooking action recognition. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. 90240G.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45, 1 (2001), 5--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yizong Cheng. 1995. Mean shift, mode seeking, and clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 17, 8 (1995), 790--799. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Robert T Collins, Ralph Gross, and Jianbo Shi. 2002. Silhouette-based human identification from body shape and gait. In Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. 366--371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Yujie Dong, Jenna Scisco, Mike Wilson, Eric Muth, and Andrew Hoover. 2014. Detecting periods of eating during free-living by tracking wrist motion. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 18, 4 (2014), 1253--1260. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mehmet Gönen. 2012. Bayesian Efficient Multiple Kernel Learning. In ICML 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, and Jerome Friedman. 2009. Kernel Smoothing Methods. In The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer, 191--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Stephen C Johnson. 1967. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32, 3 (1967), 241--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sönke Knoch, Frederic Kerber, Vladimir Pavlov, and Shreeraman Ponpathirkoottam. 2016. Automatic Capturing and Analysis of Manual Manufacturing Processes with Minimal Setup Effort. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp '16). 305--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Oliver Korn, Albrecht Schmidt, and Thomas Hörz. 2013. The potentials of in-situ-projection for augmented workplaces in production: a study with impaired persons. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts. 979--984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Daichi Kouno, Kazutaka Shimada, and Tsutomu Endo. 2012. Person identification using top-view image with depth information. In ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel & Distributed Computing. 140--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Vincent Lepetit, Pascal Lagger, and Pascal Fua. 2005. Randomized trees for real-time keypoint recognition. In CVPR 2005, Vol. 2. 775--781. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Roman Lissermann, Jochen Huber, Martin Schmitz, Jürgen Steimle, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2014. Permulin: mixed-focus collaboration on multi-view tabletops. In CHI 2014. 3191--3200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jiayang Liu, Lin Zhong, Jehan Wickramasuriya, and Venu Vasudevan. 2009. uWave: Accelerometer-based personalized gesture recognition and its applications. In PerCom 2009. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Paul Luff, Marina Jirotka, Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Christian Heath, and Grace Eden. 2013. Embedded interaction: The accomplishment of actions in everyday and video-mediated environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 1 (2013), 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Paul Lukowicz, Jamie A Ward, Holger Junker, Mathias Stäger, Gerhard Tröster, Amin Atrash, and Thad Starner. 2004. Recognizing workshop activity using body worn microphones and accelerometers. In Pervasive 2004. 18--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Takuya Maekawa. 2013. A sensor device for automatic food lifelogging that is embedded in home ceiling light: A preliminary investigation. In PervasiveHealth Workshop on Lifelogging for Pervasive Health. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Takuya Maekawa, Daisuke Nakai, Kazuya Ohara, and Yasuo Namioka. 2016. Toward practical factory activity recognition: unsupervised understanding of repetitive assembly work in a factory. In UbiComp 2016. 1088--1099. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Takuya Maekawa and Shinji Watanabe. 2011. Unsupervised Activity Recognition with User's Physical Characteristics Data. In International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC 2011). 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. George Margetis, Dimitris Grammenos, Xenophon Zabulis, and Constantine Stephanidis. 2013. iEat: An Interactive Table for Restaurant Customers' Experience Enhancement. In HCI International 2013. 666--670.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Margaret A McDowell, National Center for Health Statistics (US), and others. 2008. Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2003--2006. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Dan Pelleg and Andrew Moore. 2000. X-means: Extending k-means with efficient estimation of the number of clusters. In ICML 2000, Vol. 1. 727--734.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Matthai Philipose, Kenneth P Fishkin, Mike Perkowitz, Donald J Patterson, Dieter Fox, Henry Kautz, and Dirk Hähnel. 2004. Inferring activities from interactions with objects. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3, 4 (2004), 50--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Johannes Preis, Moritz Kessel, Martin Werner, and Claudia Linnhoff-Popien. 2012. Gait recognition with Kinect. In 1st International Workshop on Kinect in Pervasive Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Stephan Richter, Christian Holz, and Patrick Baudisch. 2012. Bootstrapper: recognizing tabletop users by their shoes. In CHI 2012. 1249--1252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Marcus Rohrbach, Sikandar Amin, Mykhaylo Andriluka, and Bernt Schiele. 2012. A database for fine grained activity detection of cooking activities. In CVPR 2012. 1194--1201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Volker Roth, Philipp Schmidt, and Benjamin Güldenring. 2010. The IR ring: authenticating users' touches on a multi-touch display. In UIST 2010. 259--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Dominik Schmidt, Ming Ki Chong, and Hans Gellersen. 2010. HandsDown: hand-contour-based user identification for interactive surfaces. In The 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 432--441. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Yifan Shi, Yan Huang, David Minnen, Aaron Bobick, and Irfan Essa. 2004. Propagation networks for recognition of partially ordered sequential action. In CVPR 2004, Vol. 2. 862--869.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jamie Shotton, Toby Sharp, Alex Kipman, Andrew Fitzgibbon, Mark Finocchio, Andrew Blake, Mat Cook, and Richard Moore. 2013. Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images. Commun. ACM 56, 1 (2013), 116--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Vijay Srinivasan, John Stankovic, and Kamin Whitehouse. 2010. Using height sensors for biometric identification in multi-resident homes. In Pervasive2010. 337--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Sebastian Stein and Stephen J McKenna. 2013. Combining embedded accelerometers with computer vision for recognizing food preparation activities. In UbiComp 2013. 729--738.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Atsushi Sugiura and Yoshiyuki Koseki. 1998. A user interface using fingerprint recognition: holding commands and data objects on fingers. In UIST 98. 71--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Liang Wang, Tieniu Tan, Huazhong Ning, and Weiming Hu. 2003. Silhouette analysis-based gait recognition for human identification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 25, 12 (2003), 1505--1518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Jianxin Wu, Adebola Osuntogun, Tanzeem Choudhury, Matthai Philipose, and James M Rehg. 2007. A scalable approach to activity recognition based on object use. In ICCV 2007. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Identification from ceiling: unconstrained person identification for tabletops using multiview learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MUM '16: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
      December 2016
      366 pages
      ISBN:9781450348607
      DOI:10.1145/3012709

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 December 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MUM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate35of77submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader