skip to main content
10.1145/3014812.3014822acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesaus-cswConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Insights into visualizing trajectory recommendation rankings

Published: 31 January 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Maps are the center point of many ancient and current visualizations. Recently, increased usage of mobile devices has promoted application of map-based visualizations, specially for navigation and point of interest representation. The types of representations on these maps however have not changed significantly. In this paper we discuss our studies on map visualizations in the context of visualizing trajectories and their ranking order for a trip recommender system. We have asked set of participants to demonstrate how they perceive trajectory recommendations and how they represent their rankings. We hope our findings help trip recommender tool designers to choose more human centered visual representations.

References

[1]
M. Agrawala, W. Li, and F. Berthouzoz. Design principles for visual communication. Commun. ACM, 54(4):60--69, 2011.
[2]
N. Andrienko and G. Andrienko. Visual analytics of movement: An overview of methods, tools and procedures. Information Visualization, 12(1):3--24, Jan 2013.
[3]
J. Bertin. Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps. University of Wisconsin press, 1983.
[4]
J. Borrís, A. Moreno, and A. Valls. Review: Intelligent tourism recommender systems: A survey. Expert Syst. Appl., 41(16):7370--7389, 2014.
[5]
S. Gratzl, A. Lex, N. Gehlenborg, H. Pfister, and M. Streit. Lineup: Visual analysis of multi-attribute rankings. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 19(12):2277--2286, Dec 2013.
[6]
P. Karnick, D. Cline, S. Jeschke, A. Razdan, and P. Wonka. Route visualization using detail lenses. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(2):235--247, 2010.
[7]
S. Koceski and B. Petrevska. Empirical evidence of contribution to e-tourism by application of personalized tourism recommendation system. Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, 59(1):363--374, 2003.
[8]
H. Liu, Y. Gao, L. Lu, S. Liu, H. Qu, and L. Ni. Visual analysis of route diversity. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011 IEEE Conference on, pages 171--180, Oct 2011.
[9]
M. Lu, Z. Wang, and X. Yuan. Trajrank: Exploring travel behaviour on a route by trajectory ranking. In Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2015 IEEE Pacific, pages 311--318, 2015.
[10]
B. Ripley, D. Liu, M. Chang, and Kinshuk. Next stop recommender. In Awareness Science and Technology and Ubi-Media Computing (iCAST-UMEDIA), 2013 International Joint Conference on, pages 120--125, 2013.
[11]
M. Sorrows and S. Hirtle. The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In C. Freksa and D. Mark, editors, Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, volume 1661 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 37--50. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999.
[12]
Y. Tanahashi and K.-L. Ma. Onmyway: A task-oriented visualization and interface design for planning road trip itinerary. In Cyberworlds (CW), 2013 International Conference on, pages 199--205, 2013.
[13]
C. Tominski, H. Schumann, G. Andrienko, and N. Andrienko. Stacking-based visualization of trajectory attribute data. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 18(12):2565--2574, Dec 2012.
[14]
E. R. Tufte. Visual explanations: images and quantities, evidence and narrative, volume 36. Graphics Press Cheshire, CT, 1997.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ACSW '17: Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference
January 2017
615 pages
ISBN:9781450347686
DOI:10.1145/3014812
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 January 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ACSW 2017
ACSW 2017: Australasian Computer Science Week 2017
January 30 - February 3, 2017
Geelong, Australia

Acceptance Rates

ACSW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 78 of 156 submissions, 50%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 204 of 424 submissions, 48%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 77
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media