research-article

Folk Pedagogy and the Geek Gene: Geekiness Quotient

Authors:

Robert McCartney,

Jonas Boustedt,

Carol ZanderAuthors Info & Claims

SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Pages 405 - 410

https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017746

Published: 08 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

In a survey of the CS-education community, we find a range of beliefs about the "geek gene" theory. We suggest an alternative term, the "geekiness quotient (GQ)". The GQ, grounded in Gardner's work on multiple intelligences, is a hypothetical measure of the student's current CS ability. The GQ supports a moderate view of the geek gene: that students arrive in our classrooms with a range of CS abilities, whether acquired through background or innate talent, and can improve their abilities through effort.

References

[1]

Re: Motivating students. was: Survey results, October 2014. SIGCSE mailing list, Item 013729. http://sigcse.org/sigcse/membership/mailing-lists. (Last accessed 26 August 2016).

[2]

A. Ahadi and R. Lister. Geek genes, prior knowledge, stumbling points and learning edge momentum: Parts of the one elephant? In ICER '13, pages 123--128, 2013.

Digital Library

[3]

J. Bennedsen and M. E. Caspersen. Abstraction ability as an indicator of success for learning computing science? In ICER '08, pages 15--26, 2008.

Digital Library

[4]

S. Bergin and R. Reilly. Programming: Factors that influence success. In SIGCSE '05, pages 411--415. ACM, 2005.

Digital Library

[5]

R. Bornat. Camels and humps: a retraction. Retrieved from http://www.eis.mdx.ac.uk/staffpages/r_bornat/papers/camel_hump_retraction.pdf (Last accessed August 17, 2016), July 2014.

[6]

J. Bruner. Folk pedagogy. In The Culture of Education, chapter 2, pages 44--65. Harvard University Press, 1996.

[7]

M. E. Caspersen, K. D. Larsen, and J. Bennedsen. Mental models and programming aptitude. In ITiCSE '07, pages 206--210. ACM, 2007.

Digital Library

[8]

S. Dehnadi and R. Bornat. The camel has two humps (working title). Retrieved from http://www.eis.mdx.ac.uk/research/PhDArea/saeed/paper1.pdf (Last accessed August 17, 2016), 2006.

[9]

C. S. Dweck. Can personality be changed? the role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6):391--394, 2008.

[10]

H. Gardner. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books, 1993.

[11]

M. Guzdial. Are some people suited for CS1, and others not? Computing Education Blog, November 29 2009. https://computinged.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/are-some-people-suited-for-cs1-and-others-not/ (last accessed August 2, 2016).

[12]

L. J. Höök and A. Eckerdal. On the bimodality in an introductory programming course: An analysis of student performance factors. In LATICE '15, pages 79--86, 2015.

Digital Library

[13]

C. Lewis. Attitudes and beliefs about computer science among students and faculty. SIGCSE Bull., 39(2):37--41, June 2007.

Digital Library

[14]

E. Patitsas, J. Berlin, M. Craig, and S. Easterbrook. Evidence that computer science grades are not bimodal. In ICER '16, pages 113--121. ACM, 2016.

Digital Library

[15]

A. Robins. Learning edge momentum: a new account of outcomes in cs1. Computer Science Education, 20(1):37--71, 2010.

[16]

Simon, S. Fincher, A. Robins, B. Baker, I. Box, Q. Cutts, M. de Raadt, P. Haden, J. Hamer, M. Hamilton, R. Lister, M. Petre, K. Sutton, D. Tolhurst, and J. Tutty. Predictors of success in a first programming course. In ACE2006, volume 52 of CRPIT, pages 189--196, Hobart, Australia, 2006.

Digital Library

[17]

J. Ventura, P.R. Identifying predictors of success for an objects-first cs1. Computer Science Education, 15(3):223--243, 2005.

[18]

C. Watson, F. W. Li, and J. L. Godwin. No tests required: Comparing traditional and dynamic predictors of programming success. In SIGCSE '14, pages 469--474, 2014.

Digital Library

[19]

B. C. Wilson and S. Shrock. Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. In SIGCSE '01, pages 184--188, 2001.

Digital Library

Cited By

Mejias MWashington GBurge LWilson DKouaho LMarshall J(2024)A Framework For Discussing Black Student Threats to Belonging in Computer Science2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00011(15-20)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00011
Rachmatullah AVandenberg JShin SWiebe E(2023)Cross-Country Variation in (Binary) Gender Differences in Secondary School Students’ CS Attitudes: Re-Validating and Generalizing a CS Attitudes ScaleACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363001423:4(1-22)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630014
Brown NHermans FMargulieux L(2023)10 Things Software Developers Should Learn about LearningCommunications of the ACM10.1145/358485967:1(78-87)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3584859
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Folk Pedagogy and the Geek Gene: Geekiness Quotient
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

March 2017

838 pages

ISBN:9781450346986

DOI:10.1145/3017680

General Chairs:
Michael E. Caspersen
Aarhus University
,
Stephen H. Edwards
Virginia Tech
,
Program Chairs:
Tiffany Barnes
North Carolina State University
,
Daniel D. Garcia
University of California, Berkeley

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 March 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGCSE '17

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

SIGCSE '17: The 48th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

March 8 - 11, 2017

Washington, Seattle, USA

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 105 of 348 submissions, 30%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,787 of 5,146 submissions, 35%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

15
Total Citations
View Citations
315
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)31
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Mejias MWashington GBurge LWilson DKouaho LMarshall J(2024)A Framework For Discussing Black Student Threats to Belonging in Computer Science2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00011(15-20)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00011
Rachmatullah AVandenberg JShin SWiebe E(2023)Cross-Country Variation in (Binary) Gender Differences in Secondary School Students’ CS Attitudes: Re-Validating and Generalizing a CS Attitudes ScaleACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363001423:4(1-22)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630014
Brown NHermans FMargulieux L(2023)10 Things Software Developers Should Learn about LearningCommunications of the ACM10.1145/358485967:1(78-87)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3584859
Goree SCrandall DSu N(2023)“It Was Really All About Books:” Speech-like Techno-Masculinity in the Rhetoric of Dot-Com Era Web Design BooksACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/350806730:2(1-27)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3508067
Lapierre HCharland PLéger P(2023)Looking “Under the hood” of learning computer programming: the emotional and cognitive differences between novices and beginnersComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2023.221403334:3(331-352)Online publication date: 25-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2023.2214033
Alvarez CSamary MWise A(2023)Modularization for mastery learning in CS1: a 4-year action research studyJournal of Computing in Higher Education10.1007/s12528-023-09366-136:2(546-589)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09366-1
Arufe Giráldez VNavarro-Patón RSanmiguel-Rodríguez A(2022)Gamification in Higher EducationHandbook of Research on the Influence and Effectiveness of Gamification in Education10.4018/978-1-6684-4287-6.ch004(63-84)Online publication date: 20-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4287-6.ch004
Xie BOleson AEverson JKo A(2022)Surfacing Equity Issues in Large Computing Courses with Peer-Ranked, Demographically-Labeled Student FeedbackProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35129126:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3512912
Szabo CSheard J(2022)Learning Theories Use and Relationships in Computing Education ResearchACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/348705623:1(1-34)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3487056
Mooney CBecker B(2021)Investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on computing students' sense of belongingACM Inroads10.1145/346340812:2(38-45)Online publication date: 10-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3463408
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten