skip to main content
10.1145/3017680.3017791acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating the Effect of Using Physical Manipulatives to Foster Computational Thinking in Elementary School

Published:08 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Researchers and educators have designed curricula and resources for introductory programming environments such as Scratch, App Inventor, and Kodu to foster computational thinking in K-12. This paper is an empirical study of the effectiveness and usefulness of tiles and flashcards developed for Microsoft Kodu Game Lab to support students in learning how to program and develop games. In particular, we investigated the impact of physical manipulatives on 3rd -- 5th grade students' ability to understand, recognize, construct, and use game programming design patterns. We found that the students who used physical manipulatives performed well in rule construction, whereas the students who engaged more with the rule editor of the programming environment had better mental simulation of the rules and understanding of the concepts.

References

  1. Bhagi, A. (n.d.). App Inventor Concept Cards. Retrieved August 26, 2016, from http://appinventor.mit.edu/explore/sites/all/files/ConceptCards/ai2/AI2_ConceptCards.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. CS Unplugged; http://csunplugged.org. Accessed 2016 June 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dann, W. P., Cooper, S., & Pausch, R. (2011). Learning to Program with Alice (w/CD ROM). Prentice Hall Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Enome, Inc. (n.d.). Literacy Manipulatives. Retrieved August 26, 2016, from https://goalbookapp.com/toolkit/strategy/literacy-manipulativesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Learning Resources, "Research on the benefits of manipulatives;" http://www.learningresources.com/text/pdf/Mathresearch.pdf Accessed 2016 June 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lifelong Kindergarten Group (MIT), "Blocks;" http://wiki.scratch.mit.edu/wiki/Blocks. Accessed 2016 June 18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Moore, S. D. (n.d.). Why Teach Mathematics with Manipulatives? Retrieved August 26, 2016, from ETA hand2mind; http://www.hand2mind.com/pdf/Benefits_of_Manipulatives.pdf. Accessed 2016 June 18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Repenning, A., Webb, D., & Ioannidou, A. (2010, March). Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 265--269). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Resnick, M., et al. "Scratch: Programming for everyone." Communications of the ACM 52, 11 (2009): 60--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rusk, N. "Scratch cards;" http://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/resources/scratch-cards-0. Accessed 2016 July 21Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stolee, K. T., & Fristoe, T. (2011, March). Expressing computer science concepts through Kodu game lab. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 99--104). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Touretzky, D. S., Marghitu, D., Ludi, S., Bernstein, D., & Ni, L. (2013, March). Accelerating K-12 computational thinking using scaffolding, staging, and abstraction. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 609--614). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Touretzky, D. S. (2014). Teaching Kodu with physical manipulatives. ACM Inroads, 5(4), 44--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Touretzky, D. S., Gardner-McCune, C., & Aggarwal, A. (2016, February). Teaching Lawfulness With Kodu. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (pp. 621--626). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Touretzky, D. S. (n.d.). Kodu Curriculum Modules. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Kodu/Curriculum/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Touretzky, D. S. (n.d.). Kodu Idiom Flash Cards & Tiles. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Kodu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating the Effect of Using Physical Manipulatives to Foster Computational Thinking in Elementary School

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
              March 2017
              838 pages
              ISBN:9781450346986
              DOI:10.1145/3017680

              Copyright © 2017 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 8 March 2017

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              SIGCSE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate105of348submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

              Upcoming Conference

              SIGCSE Virtual 2024
              SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
              November 30 - December 1, 2024
              Virtual Event , USA

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader