skip to main content
10.1145/3018896.3036387acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparative analysis of different classification algorithms for prediction of diabetes disease

Published:22 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Diabetes Mellitus is fast becoming an endemic in the world, especially in developing countries. An efficient prediction methodology is needed to diagnose the diabetes disease, which can be helpful for health care professionals. Data mining techniques have been widely used in healthcare to mine knowledgeable information from medical data. Data mining is the process of analyzing data based on different perspectives and summarizing it into useful information. Data mining techniques are proven forearly prediction of several diseases with higher accuracy and lower error rate and cost. Classification is one of the generally used techniques in medical data mining. In this paper, we intend to explore various data mining techniques to show the comparison of different classification algorithms using Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) and analyze the results in order to find the best suitable classification algorithm for prediction of diabetes diseases. Various performance measures metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and error rate are used for finding the accuracy of the classifier.

References

  1. Bellazzi, R. & Zupan, B. (2008). Predictive data mining in clinical medicine: Current issues and guidelines. International Journal Of Medical Informatics, 77(2), 81--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J.C.Pickup, G. Williams, (Eds.), Textbook of diabetes, Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. "Weka 3 - Data Mining With Open Source Machine Learning Software In Java". Cs.waikato.ac.nz. N.p., 2016. Web. 28 Nov. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lichman, M. (2013). UCI Machine Learning Repository (http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dhakate, P., Rajeswari, K., & Abin, D. (2015). Analysis of Different Classifiers for Medical Dataset using Various Measures, 111(5), 20--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mourya, M., & Prasad, P. (2013).An Effective Execution of Diabetes Dataset Using WEKA.International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 4(5), 681--682.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vohra, R. (2014). Prediction of Diabetes Using Bayesian Network, 5(4), 5174--5178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumar, D. (1995). Performance Analysis of Various Data Mining Algorithms: A Review. Methods, 32(6), 9--15. Retrieved from http://www.ijcaonline.org/archives/volume32/number6/3906-5476\nhttp://research.ijcaonline.org/volume32/number6/pxc3875476.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yasodha, P. (2011). Analysis of a Population of Diabetic Patients Databases in Weka Tool.Ijser.Org, 2(5), 1--5. Retrieved from http://www.ijser.org/researchpaper\Analysis_of_a_Population_of_Diabetic_Patients_Databases_in_Weka_Tool.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Vispute, N. J. (n.d.). An Empirical Comparision by Data Mining Classification Techniques for Diabetes Data Set, 131(2), 6--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kohl, M., & Fp, T. N. (2012). Performance Measures in Binary Classification, 49(0), 79--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B, S. K., & Gayathri, P. (2014). Analysis of Adult-Onset Diabetes Using Data Mining Classification Algorithms, 7868(2), 37--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICC '17: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of things, Data and Cloud Computing
    March 2017
    1349 pages
    ISBN:9781450347747
    DOI:10.1145/3018896

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 March 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    ICC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate213of590submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate213of590submissions,36%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader