skip to main content
10.1145/3018896.3065837acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Distributed faulty sensor node detection in wireless sensor networks based on copula theory

Published:22 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are arising from the proliferation of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) technology as an important new area in wireless technology. They are composed of tiny devices which monitor physical or environmental conditions such as temperature, pressure, motion or pollutants, etc. Moreover, the accuracy of individual sensor node readings is decisive in WSN applications. Hence, detecting nodes with faulty sensors can strictly influence the network performance and extend the network life-time. In this paper, we propose a new approach for faulty sensor node detection in WSNs based on Copula theory. The obtained experimental results on real datasets collected from real sensor networks show the effectiveness of our approach.1

References

  1. Ian F Akyildiz, Weilian Su, Yogesh Sankarasubramaniam, and Erdal Cayirci. 2002. Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer networks 38, 4 (2002), 393--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jinran Chen, Shubha Kher, and Arun Somani. 2006. Distributed fault detection of wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2006 workshop on Dependability issues in wireless ad hoc networks and sensor networks. ACM, 65--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Intel Lab Data. 2004. (2004). http://db.lcs.mit.edu/labdata/labdata.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Paul Deheuvels. 1979. La fonction de dépendance empirique et ses propriétés. Un test non paramétrique d'indépendance. Acad. Roy. Belg. Bull. Cl. Sci. (5) 65, 6 (1979), 274--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. William F Eddy. 1977. A new convex hull algorithm for planar sets. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) 3, 4 (1977), 398--403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Christian Genest and Anne-Catherine Favre. 2007. Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. Journal of hydrologic engineering 12, 4 (2007), 347--368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Shuo Guo, Heng Zhang, Ziguo Zhong, Jiming Chen, Qing Cao, and Tian He. 2014. Detecting faulty nodes with data errors for wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) 10, 3 (2014), 40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Shah Ahsanul Haque, Mustafizur Rahman, and Syed Mahfuzul Aziz. 2015. Sensor Anomaly Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks for Healthcare. Sensors 15, 4 (2015), 8764--8786.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Zhiping Kang, Honglin Yu, Qingyu Xiong, and Haibo Hu. 2014. Spatial-temporal correlative fault detection in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 2014 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Safdar Abbas Khan, Boubaker Daachi, and Karim Djouani. 2012. Application of fuzzy inference systems to detection of faults in wireless sensor networks. Neurocomputing 94 (2012), 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Farinaz Koushanfar, Miodrag Potkonjak, and Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. 2003. On-line fault detection of sensor measurements. In Sensors, 2003. Proceedings of IEEE, Vol. 2. IEEE, 974--979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Farid Lalem, Rahim Kacimi, Ahcène Bounceur, and Reinhardt Euler. 2016. Boundary node failure detection in wireless sensor networks. In Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), 2016 International Symposium on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Roger B Nelsen. 2007. An introduction to copulas. Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Marek Omelka, Irène Gijbels, Noël Veraverbeke, and others. 2009. Improved kernel estimation of copulas: weak convergence and goodness-of-fit testing. The Annals of Statistics 37, 5B (2009), 3023--3058.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/ ISBN 3-900051-07-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ludger Rüschendorf. 2009. On the distributional transform, Sklar's theorem, and the empirical copula process. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139, 11 (2009), 3921--3927.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M Sklar. 1959. Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Université Paris 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Weili Wu, Xiuzhen Cheng, Min Ding, Kai Xing, Fang Liu, and Ping Deng. 2007. Localized outlying and boundary data detection in sensor networks. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 19, 8 (2007), 1145--1157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICC '17: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of things, Data and Cloud Computing
    March 2017
    1349 pages
    ISBN:9781450347747
    DOI:10.1145/3018896

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 March 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    ICC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate213of590submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate213of590submissions,36%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader