skip to main content
10.1145/3019612.3019649acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-CNN and decision tree based driving behavior evaluation

Published:03 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Driving behavior is directly related to the lives and property safety of the drivers and others, good driving behavior can not only reduce the accident rate, but also reduce the driving risk. In this paper, an effective driving behavior evaluation method is proposed. Features integration is very important, we propose the multi-CNN architecture, it has a higher prediction accuracy. Convolutional neural network is time-consuming and computation intensive, a dynamic fixed point compression method is applied in our system, smaller model size and faster speed can be achieved while the accuracy is high. The lanes, cars and pedestrians on the road are detected, meanwhile, the distance between the host car and the nearest car in front of it is calculated. These data are predicted by a trained Gradient Boosting Decision Tree model, the prediction result is a driving score that can reflect the driver's driving behavior is good or bad. The root mean square error of our model is 1.9, which has a high accuracy and is useful in practice.

References

  1. X. An, M. Wu, and H. He. A novel approach to provide lane departure warning using only one forward-looking camera. In Collaborative Technologies and Systems, 2006. CTS 2006. International Symposium on, pages 356--362. IEEE, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. I. Arenado, J. M. P. Oria, C. Torre-Ferrero, and L. A. Rentería. Monovision-based vehicle detection, distance and relative speed measurement in urban traffic. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 8(8):655--664, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Beyeler, F. Mirus, and A. Verl. Vision-based robust road lane detection in urban environments. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, pages 4920--4925. IEEE, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J.-Y. Chang and C.-W. Cho. Vision-based front vehicle detection and its distance estimation. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2006. SMC'06. IEEE International Conference on, volume 3, pages 2063--2068. IEEE, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Chen, X. Zhang, H. Wang, Q. Shi, and R. Li. Pedestrian detection combining rgb and dense lidar data. In Ieee/rsj International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 4112 -- 4117, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. X. Chen and H. Ma. 3d object proposals for accurate object class detection. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 1, pages 886--893. IEEE, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. E. Forward. The theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive norms and past behaviour in the prediction of driversâĂŹ intentions to violate. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(3):198--207, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. H. Friedman. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics, pages 1189--1232, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. V. Gaikwad and S. Lokhande. Lane departure identification for advanced driver assistance. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 16(2):910--918, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun. Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. X. He, J. Pan, O. Jin, T. Xu, B. Liu, T. Xu, Y. Shi, A. Atallah, R. Herbrich, S. Bowers, et al. Practical lessons from predicting clicks on ads at facebook. In Proceedings of 20th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 1--9. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Hörwick and K.-H. Siedersberger. Strategy and architecture of a safety concept for fully automatic and autonomous driving assistance systems. In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2010 IEEE, pages 955--960. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Krause, M. Stark, J. Deng, and L. Fei-Fei. 3d object representations for fine-grained categorization. In Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pages 554--561. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. Li, T. Wu, and S. C. Zhu. Integrating Context and Occlusion for Car Detection by Hierarchical And-Or Model. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. E. Ohn-Bar and M. M. Trivedi. Learning to detect vehicles by clustering appearance patterns. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(5):2511--2521, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. B. Pepikj, M. Stark, P. Gehler, and B. Schiele. Multi-view and 3d deformable part models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 37(11):2232--2245, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. G. Philipp Gysel, Mohammad Motamedi. Hardware-oriented approximation of convolutional neural networks. arxiv, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. K. Satzoda and M. M. Trivedi. Efficient lane and vehicle detection with integrated synergies (elvis). In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2014 IEEE Conference on, pages 708--713. IEEE, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Y. Tian, P. Luo, X. Wang, and X. Tang. Deep learning strong parts for pedestrian detection. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. P. Tseng. On accelerated proximal gradient methods for convex-concave optimization. Siam Journal on Optimization, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Wu and C. Gu. The design and implementation of real-time automatic vehicle detection and counting system. In Information Engineering and Computer Science, 2009. ICIECS 2009. International Conference on, pages 1--4. IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Y. Xiang, W. Choi, Y. Lin, and S. Savarese. Data-driven 3d voxel patterns for object category recognition. In CVPR, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. B. Yu, W. Zhang, and Y. Cai. A lane departure warning system based on machine vision. In Computational Intelligence and Industrial Application, 2008. PACIIA'08. Pacific-Asia Workshop on, volume 1, pages 197--201. IEEE, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. H. Zhao, H. Zhou, C. Chen, and J. Chen. Join driving: A smart phone-based driving behavior evaluation system. In Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2013 IEEE, pages 48--53. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Q. Zhou, G. Wang, K. Jia, and Q. Zhao. Learning to share latent tasks for action recognition, pages 2264--2271, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multi-CNN and decision tree based driving behavior evaluation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '17: Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing
          April 2017
          2004 pages
          ISBN:9781450344869
          DOI:10.1145/3019612

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 April 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader