skip to main content
10.1145/3019612.3019653acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

ICE: self-configuration of information processing in heterogeneous agent teams

Published:03 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Teams of agents, solving complex tasks in dynamic environments, require high-quality information about the current situation. One way of achieving high-quality information is reliable information processing, that is suitable for the application domain. However, the characteristics of some domains such as disaster scenarios are partially unknown at design-time. Therefore, specifying information processing at design-time becomes nearly impossible and leads to unreliable information. We tackle this problem with the ICE middleware which supports adaptive information processing for teams of autonomous agents. It provides a decentralized self-configuration and dynamic integration of information sources. A configuration is created with respect to required information, available sources, and resource constraints. Our evaluation shows that ICE is sufficiently efficient to be operated in highly dynamic domains.

References

  1. A. Bennaceur, C. Chilton, M. Isberner, and B. Jonsson. Automated mediator synthesis: Combining behavioural and ontological reasoning. In SEFM, volume 8137 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Blair, N. Bencomo, and R. B. France. [email protected]. Computer, 42(10), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Eiter, G. Ianni, and T. Krennwallner. Reasoning web. semantic technologies for information systems. chapter Answer Set Programming: A Primer. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Floch, C. Fra, R. Fricke, K. Geihs, M. Wagner, J. Lorenzo, E. Soladana, S. Mehlhase, N. Paspallis, H. Rahnama, P. Ruiz, and U. Scholz. Playing MUSIC - building context-aware and self-adaptive mobile applications. In Software: Practice and Experience, volume 43. Wiley, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Gardner-Stephen and S. Palaniswamy. Serval mesh software-wifi multi model management. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Wireless Technologies for Humanitarian Relief, ACWR '11. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Gebser, R. Kaminski, B. Kaufmann, and T. Schaub. Clingo = ASP + Control: Preliminary Report. In Proc. of Technical Communications of the Twenty-ninth International Conference on Logic Programming, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Gebser, B. Kaufmann, A. Neumann, and T. Schaub. clasp: A Conflict-Driven Answer Set Solver. In Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, volume 4483 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. K. Geihs, P. Barone, F. Eliassen, J. Floch, R. Fricke, E. Gjørven, S. Hallsteinsen, G. Horn, M. U. Khan, A. Mamelli, G. A. Papadopoulos, N. Paspallis, R. Reichle, and E. Stav. A comprehensive solution for application-level adaptation. Softw. Pract. Exper., 39(4), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. F. Heintz. DyKnow: A Stream-Based Knowledge Processing Middleware Framework. PhD thesis, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. F. Heintz and P. Doherty. DyKnow: A Framework for Processing Dynamic Knowledge and Object Structures in Autonomous Systems. In Monitoring, Security, and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems, volume 28 of Advances in Soft Computing. Springer, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. V. Issarny and Consortium Connect. CONNECT: Emergent Connectors for Eternal Software Intensive Networked Systems. In The European Future Technologies Conference and Exhibition, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. J. Li. Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Reasoning with Answer Set Programming. In 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, volume 1, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Niemczyk and K. Geihs. Adaptive Run-Time Models for Groups of Autonomous Robots. In IEEE, editor, 10th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS). 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Quigley, K. Conley, B. P. Gerkey, J. Faust, T. Foote, J. Leibs, R. Wheeler, and A. Y. Ng, editors. ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Reichle, M. Wagner, M. U. Khan, K. Geihs, J. Lorenzo, M. Valla, C. Fra, N. Paspallis, and G. A. Papadopoulos. A comprehensive context modeling framework for pervasive computing systems. In Proceedings of the 8th IFIP WG 6.1 international conference on Distributed applications and interoperable systems. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Y. Zhang and L. Parker. IQ-ASyMTRe: Forming Executable Coalitions for Tightly Coupled Multirobot Tasks. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 29(2), 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ICE: self-configuration of information processing in heterogeneous agent teams

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '17: Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing
          April 2017
          2004 pages
          ISBN:9781450344869
          DOI:10.1145/3019612

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 April 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader