skip to main content
10.1145/3019612.3019777acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On continuous deployment maturity in customer projects

Published:03 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The practice of making new software available to end users as soon as it gets implemented is becoming commonplace. This paper investigates a set of projects and their development practices in a mid-sized Finnish software company Solita Ltd. to understand how continuous deployment practices are applied in development teams. This was done by establishing a maturity scale and using it to survey the teams. In addition, we interviewed members of selected teams to understand why a particular level of maturity is desirable for a project, and to reveal the issues that impact team's ability to improve. We found that while the team, the customer, and the product all benefit from mature development practices associated with continuous deployment, some obstacles can be solved only by changing the organizational modus operandi.

References

  1. H. Beyer, K. Holtzblatt, and L. Baker. An agile customer-centered method: rapid contextual design. In Extreme Programming and Agile Methods-XP/Agile Universe 2004, pages 50--59. Springer, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. DZone Research CD Checklist, https://static.dzone.com/dzl/dz-flles/CD_Checklist_0.pdf. Accessed: 2015-10-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Devops guick guide. http://hub.eficode.fi/devops-quick-guide. Accessed: 2015-10-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Forrester Research, Inc. Continuous Delivery: A Maturity Assesment Model. http://info.thoughtworks.com/Continuous-Delivery-Maturity-Model.html, Mar. 2013. Accessed: 2015-10-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Fowler. ContinuousDelivery. http://martinfowler.com/bliki/ContinuousDelivery.html, Apr. 2013. Accessed: 2015-10-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. L. A. Guion, D. C. Diehl, and D. McDonald. Triangulation: Establishing the validity of qualitative studies. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Humble and D. Farley. Continuous delivery: reliable software releases through build, test, and deployment automation. Pearson Education, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. S. Humphrey. Characterizing the software process: a maturity framework. Software, IEEE, 5 (2): 73--79, March 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. B. Johnson and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7): 14--26, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. T. Karvonen, L. E. Lwakatare, T. Sauvola, J. Bosch, H. H. Olsson, P. Kuvaja, and M. Oivo. Hitting the target: Practices for moving toward innovation experiment systems. In Software Business, pages 117--131. Springer, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. L. Nolan. Managing the computer resource: A stage hypothesis. Commun. ACM, 16(7):399--405, July 1973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H. H. Olsson, H. Alahyari, and J. Bosch. Climbing the "stairway to heaven" - a mulitiple-case study exploring barriers in the transition from agile development towards continuous deployment of software. In V. Cortellessa, H. Muccini, and O. Demirörs, editors, EUROMICRO-SEAA, pages 392--399. IEEE Computer Society, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H. H. Olsson, J. Bosch, and H. Alahyari. Towards R&D as innovation experiment systems: A framework for moving beyond agile software development. In IASTED Multiconferences-Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering, SE 2013, pages 798--805, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Paulk. Capability maturity model for software. Wiley Online Library, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Rehn, T. Palmborg, and P. Boström. Continuous delivery maturity model, http://www.infoq.com/articles/Continuous-Delivery-Maturity-Model. Accessed: 2015-10-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Continuous delivery checklist. http://blog.xebialabs.com/continuous-delivery-maturity-checklist/. Accessed: 2015-10-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On continuous deployment maturity in customer projects

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '17: Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing
        April 2017
        2004 pages
        ISBN:9781450344869
        DOI:10.1145/3019612

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 April 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader