skip to main content
10.1145/3019612.3019805acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Semantic similarity based web services composition framework

Published:03 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computing similarities between Web services is a main concern in Service Oriented Architecture as it allows to decide which services are likely to be matched into a composite workflow, or in other cases, which services can be substituted in order to ensure continuous service availability. With the high maturity achieved by the standards, tools and frameworks in the Semantic Web domain, measuring Web services similarities relies more than ever on semantic descriptions of services as well as on semantic relationships these descriptions may hold. In this paper we present a Framework for Web services composition based on computing semantic similarity between Web services. We particularly focus on Services Matching engine which uses the considered similarity measure first to classify Web services into classes of functionally similar Web services and then to propose a composite sequence of services that matches a requested goal. In both tasks, the presented framework appeals for best known techniques of similarity computing and data and knowledge extraction, respectively.

References

  1. A. Abid, N. Messai, M. Rouached, T. Devogele, and M. Abid. A semantic similarity measure for conceptual web services classification. In WETICE, IEEE 24th International Conference on, pages 128--133. IEEE, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. L. Blum and M. L. Furst. Fast planning through planning graph analysis. Artificial intelligence, 90(1):281--300, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. G. Da Silva, L. F. Pires, and M. Van Sinderen. Towards runtime discovery, selection and composition of semantic services. Computer communications, 34(2):159--168, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. X. Dong, A. Halevy, J. Madhavan, E. Nemes, and J. Zhang. Similarity search for web services. In the Thirtieth international conference on Very large data bases-Volume 30, pages 372--383, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. Elgazzar, A. E. Hassan, and P. Martin. Clustering WSDL documents to bootstrap the discovery of web services. In Web Services (ICWS), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, pages 147--154. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Ganter and R. Wille. Formal concept analysis: mathematical foundations. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. O. Hatzi, M. Nikolaidou, D. Vrakas, N. Bassiliades, D. Anagnostopoulos, and I. Vlahavas. Semantically aware web service composition through AI planning. IJAIT, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. F. Lécué and A. Léger. A formal model for semantic web service composition. In The Semantic Web-ISWC 2006, pages 385--398. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. F. Lécué, E. Silva, and L. F. Pires. A framework for dynamic web services composition. In Emerging Web Services Technology. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. F. Liu, Y. Shi, J. Yu, T. Wang, and J. Wu. Measuring similarity of web services based on WSDL. In IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Paolucci, T. Kawamura, T. R. Payne, and K. Sycara. Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In The Semantic Web ISWC 2002. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Plebani and B. Pernici. URBE: Web service retrieval based on similarity evaluation. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Rodriguez Mier, C. Pedrinaci, M. Lama, and M. Mucientes. An integrated semantic web service discovery and composition framework. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Sánchez, M. Batet, D. Isern, and A. Valls. Ontology-based semantic similarity: A new feature-based approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. E. Wilkins. Practical planning. Elsevier Science, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Y. Yan, B. Xu, and Z. Gu. Automatic service composition using and/or graph. In 2008 10th IEEE Conference E-Commerce Technology, pages 335--338, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Semantic similarity based web services composition framework

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '17: Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing
          April 2017
          2004 pages
          ISBN:9781450344869
          DOI:10.1145/3019612

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 April 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader