Dana McKay
Shanton Chang
ABSTRACT
Library shelf browsing is a much-loved but little-understood form of information seeking. Attempts have been made to replicate or replace it online, however they have not typically been based on a principled understanding of the goals and behaviours of readers. This paper addresses the behaviour of readers, presenting an empirical examination of the mechanics of library shelf browsing. We note some previously undescribed behaviours, such as placemarking, and some hitherto unknown details such as the large number of books browsers consider. We situate our findings in the literature, and use them to drive design recommendations.
- Adams, A., Lunt, P., and Cairns, P., 2008. A Qualitative Approach to HCI Research. In Research Methods for Human Computer Interaction, P. Cairns and A.L. Cox Eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 138--157.Google Scholar
- Bates, M.J., 2007. What is browsing--really? A model drawing from behavioural science research. Inform Res 12.Google Scholar
- Berg, S.A., Hoffmann, K., and Dawson, D., 2010. Not on the Same Page: Undergraduates' Information Retrieval in Electronic and Print Books. J Acad Libr 36, 6, 518--525.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Blandford, A., Rimmer, J., and Warwick, C., 2006. Experiences of the Library in the Digital Age. In Proc CCCDT 06 (Tavros, Greece), FOHW.Google Scholar
- Borgman, C.L., 1996. Why are online catalogs still hard to use? JASIS 47, 7, 493--503. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Borgman, C.L., Hirsh, S.G., Walter, V.A., and Gallagher, A.L., 1995. Children's searching behavior on browsing and keyword online catalogs: The Science Library Catalog project. JASIS 46, 9, 663--684. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bowker, G.C. and Star, S.L., 2000. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. MIT Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buchanan, G. and Mckay, D., 2011. In the Bookshop: Examining Popular Search Strategies. In Proc JCDL 11 (Ottawa, Canada), ACM, 269--278. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cooksey, E.B., 2004. Too Important to Be Left to Chance--Serendipity and the Digital Library. Sci & Tech Lib 25, 1--2, 23--32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Crabtree, A., Twidale, M.B., O'brien, J., and Nichols, D.M., 1997. Talking in the Library: Implications for the Design of Digital Libraries. In Proc DL97 (Philadelphia, PA), ACM, 221--228. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cummings, I., 2011. Kansas libraries lead way in e-book access. In Kansan.com http://www.kansan.com/news/2011/nov/01/kansas-libraries-lead-way-e-book-access/?newsGoogle Scholar
- Cunningham, S.J., 2011. How children find books for leisure reading: implications for the digital library. In Proc JCDL 11 (Ottawa, Canada), ACM, 431--432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fast, K.V. and Campbell, D.G., 2004. "I still like Google" University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web. ASIST Proceedings 41, 1, 138--146.Google Scholar
- Foster, A. and Ford, N., 2003. Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study. J Doc 59, 3, 321--340.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gorman, M., 1981. The Longer the Number the Smaller the Spine. Amer Libr 12, 8, 498.Google Scholar
- Hamblen, 2011. Amazon: E-books now outsell print books. In Computerworld. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9216869/Amazon_E_books_now_outsell_print_booksGoogle Scholar
- Hancock-Beaulieu, M., 1993. Evaluating the impact of an online library catalogue on subject searching at the catalogue and at the shelves. J Doc 46, 4, 318--338. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hardy, G. and Davies, T., 2007. Letting the patrons choose: using EBL as a method for unmediated acquisition of ebook materials. In Proc Info Online (Sydney, Australia), ALIA.Google Scholar
- Hinze, A., Mckay, D., Vanderschantz, N., Timpany, C., and Cunningham, S.J., 2012. Book selection behavior in the physical library: implications for ebook collections. In Proc JCDL '12 (Washington, DC), ACM, 305--314. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jervis, M. and Masoodian, M., 2013. Visualization of physical library shelves to facilitate collection management and retrieval. In Proc EICS 13 (London, UK), ACM, 133--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khoo, M. and Hall, C., 2012. What would 'Google' Do? Users' Mental Models of a Digital Library Search Engine. In Proc TPDL 12 (Paphos, Cyprus), Springer, 1--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kleiner, E., Rädle, R., and Reiterer, H., 2013. Blended shelf: reality-based presentation and exploration of library collections. In Proc CHI 13 (Paris, France), ACM, 577--582. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kuhlthau, C.C., 1991. Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. JASIST 42, 5, 361--371.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lau, E.P. and Goh, D.H.-L., 2006. In search of query patterns: A case study of a university OPAC. Inform Process Manag 42, 5, 1316--1329. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Loizides, F. and Buchanan, G., 2013. Towards a Framework for Human (Manual) Information Retrieval. In Proc IRFC 13 (Limassol, Cyprus), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 87--98.Google Scholar
- Losee, R.M., 1993. The relative shelf location of circulated books: A study of classification, users, and browsing. Libr Resour Tech Serv 37, 2, 197--209.Google Scholar
- Lown, C., Sierra, T., and Boyer, J., 2012. How Users Search the Library from a Single Search Box. Coll Res Libr (Jan 9).Google Scholar
- Macfayden, H., 2011. The Reader's Devices: The affordances of ebook readers. Dalhousie J Interdisc Manag 7, 1.Google Scholar
- Makri, S. and Blandford, A., 2012. Coming across information serendipitously: Part 1 -- A process model. J Doc 68, 5, 685--704.Google Scholar
- Makri, S., Blandford, A., Gow, J., Rimmer, J., Warwick, C., and Buchanan, G., 2007. A library or just another information resource? A case study of users' mental models of traditional and digital libraries. JASIST 58, 3, 433--445. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Makri, S., Blandford, A., Woods, M., Sharples, S., and Maxwell, D., 2014. "Making my own luck": Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments. JASIST 65, 11, 2179--2194.Google Scholar
- Malama, C., Landoni, M., and Wilson, R., 2004. Fiction Electronic Books: A Usability Study. In Proc ECDL 04 (Bath, UK), Springer, 69--79.Google Scholar
- Marchionini, G., 1997. Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marshall, C.C., 2010. Reading and Writing the Electronic Book. Morgan & Claypool, Chapel Hill, NC. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mckay, D., Buchanan, G., and Chang, S., 2015. Tyranny of Distance: Understanding Academic Library Browsing by Refining the Neighbour Effect. In Proc TPDL 15 (Poznan, Poland), Springer, 280--294.Google Scholar
- Mckay, D., Buchanan, G., Vanderschantz, N., Timpany, C., Cunningham, S.J., and Hinze, A., 2012. Judging a book by its cover: interface elements that affect reader selection of ebooks. In Proc OzCHI 12 (Melbourne, Australia), ACM, 381--390. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mckay, D. and Conyers, B., 2010. Where the streets have no name: how library users get lost in the stacks. In Proc CHINZ 10 (Auckland, New Zealand), ACM, 77--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mckay, D. and Cunningham, S.J., 2003. Browsing a Digital Library: A New Approach for the New Zealand Digital Library. In Proc ICADL 03 (Kuala Lumpur), Springer, 329--339.Google Scholar
- Mckay, D., Smith, W., and Chang, S., 2014. Lend me some sugar: Borrowing rates of neighbouring books as evidence for browsing. In Proc DL 2014 (London, UK), 145--154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mckay, D., Smith, W., and Chang, S., 2015. Down the Superhighway in a Single Tome: Examining the Impact of Book Format on Borrowing Interactions. In Proc OZCHI 16 (Melbourne, Australia), ACM, 517--525. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mckenzie, P.J., 2003. A model of information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking. J Doc 59, 1, 19--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Megarrity, L., 2010. Books Matter: The Place of Traditional Books in Tomorrow's Library. ALJ 59, 1/2, 6--11.Google Scholar
- Moore, P., 1995. Information Problem Solving: A Wider View of Library Skills. Contemp Educ Psych 20, 1, 1--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Neuman, W.L., 2006. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson, New York.Google Scholar
- Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., and Jamali, H.R., 2010. E-textbook use, information seeking behaviour and its impact: Case study business and management. J Inf Sci 36, 2, 263--280. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nordlie, R., 1999. "User Revealment"? A Comparison of Initial Queries and Ensuing Question Development in Online Searching and in Human Reference Interactions. In Proc SIGIR '99 (Berkeley, CA), ACM, 11--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pearce, J. and Chang, S., 2014. Exploration without Keywords: The Bookfish Case. In Proc OzCHI 2014 (Sydney, Australia), ACM, 76--79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pearson, J., Buchanan, G., and Thimbleby, H., 2010. HCI design principles for ereaders. In Proc Booksonline 10 (Toronto, Canada), ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reutzel, D.R. and Gali, K., 1998. The Art of Children's Book Selection: A Labyrinth Unexplored. Reading Psychology 19, 1, 3--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rowlands, I. and Nicholas, D., 2008. Understanding Information Behaviour: How Do Students and Faculty Find Books? J Acad Libr 34, 1, 3--15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H.R., and Huntington, P., 2007. What do faculty and students really think about e-books? Aslib Proceedings 59, 6, 489--511.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saarinen, K. and Vakkari, P., 2013. A sign of a good book: readers' methods of accessing fiction in the public library. J Doc. 69, 5, 736--754.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saarti, J., 1997. Feeding with the spoon, or the effects of shelf classification of fiction on the loaning of fiction. Inform Serv Use 17, 2/3, 159. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sadeh, T., 2007. User Experience in the Library. New Library World 109, 1/2, 7--24.Google Scholar
- Stelmaszewska, H. and Blandford, A., 2004. From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists' behaviour in physical libraries. IJDL 4, 2, 82--92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stieve, T. and Schoen, D., 2006. Undergraduate Students' Book Selection: A Study of Factors in the Decision-Making Process. J Acad Libr 32, 6, 599--608.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Svenonius, E., 2000. The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. MIT Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Swanson, T.A. and Green, J., 2011. Why We Are Not Google: Lessons from a Library Web site Usability Study. J Acad Libr 37, 3, 222--229.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thudt, A., Hinrichs, U., and Carpendale, S., 2012. The bohemian bookshelf: supporting serendipitous book discoveries through information visualization. In Proc CHI 12 (Austin, TX), ACM, 1461--1470. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Manoeuvres in the Dark: Design Implications of the Physical Mechanics of Library Shelf Browsing
Recommendations
Down the Superhighway in a Single Tome: Examining the Impact of Book Format on Borrowing Interactions
OzCHI '15: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human InteractionMany readers claim that the uptake of ebooks by libraries hampers their information seeking by not affording them the opportunity to browse. Conversely, readers value the convenience of anywhere-anytime access offered by ebooks. This paper aims to ...
Visualization of physical library shelves to facilitate collection management and retrieval
EICS '13: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systemsElectronic cataloguing systems are used by libraries to provide search mechanisms for finding books in their collections. These systems provide limited, if any, tools for browsing content electronically in a manner similar to browsing books on physical ...
Lend me some sugar: borrowing rates of neighbouring books as evidence for browsing
JCDL '14: Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital LibrariesThere is more to choosing a book than simply keyword searching. Browsing is a fundamental part of the information seeking process, and one that information seekers profess to value, though it has attracted little study. This dearth of research is ...
Comments