skip to main content
10.1145/3024906.3024911acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Gender Equity in Computing: International Faculty Perceptions and Current Practices

Published: 09 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In many countries serious effort has been put into developing and running programs that encourage girls to enjoy learning programming. At school level, many girls have done very well in these experiences, but despite their confidence and enthusiasm for programming at the time of the intervention, few have continued on to enroll in tertiary computing programs. In higher education institutions, numerous equity initiatives have attempted to improve both recruitment and retention, yet the pipeline continues to shrink.
The running of interventions takes effort on the part of the academics to develop and much time, often in vacation periods, to deliver. As the success of these programs frequently relies on the goodwill of faculty, the authors formed an international multi-disciplinary working group to explore faculty attitudes and perceptions of these gender equity programs, and identify key features of enduring programs.
In this paper, we gather and critically review existing literature resources with the aim of developing evaluation guidelines for the running of intervention programs from primary school to university education in order to encourage girls of all ages to seriously consider the prospect of undertaking a computing degree and to better support them during this time. Additionally, we explore the perceptions of faculty towards gender equity and gender equity programs, and discuss how faculty perceptions align with research findings.
Our findings identify a clear need for gender equity programs, more consistent evaluation of the effectiveness of such programs including gathering, analysing and storing longitudinal data and more widespread dissemination of gender equity information to faculty.

References

[1]
C. Alvarado and Z. Dodds. Women in CS: An evaluation of three promising practices. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '10, pages 57--61, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[2]
C. Alvarado, Z. Dodds, and R. Libeskind-Hadas. Increasing women's participation in computing at Harvey Mudd College. ACM Inroads, 3(4):55, 2012.
[3]
C. Alvarado and E. Judson. Using targeted conferences to recruit women into computer science. Communications of the ACM, 57(3):70--77, 2014.
[4]
Australian Government, The. National innovation and science agenda. Inspiring all Australians in digital literacy and STEM. Retrieved December 1, 2016, from: https://www.education.gov.au/inspiring-all-australians-digital-literacy-and-stem, 2016.
[5]
L. Bailyn. Academic careers and gender equity: Lessons learned from mit1. Gender, Work & Organization, 10(2):137--153, 2003.
[6]
A. Balanskat and K. Engelhardt. Computing our future. computer programming and coding - priorities, school curricula and initiatives across europe. Technical report, European Schoolnet, 2014.
[7]
L. J. Barker, J. M. Cohoon, and L. Sanders. Strategy trumps money: Recruiting undergraduate women into computing. IEEE Computer, 43(6):82--85, 2010.
[8]
L. J. Barker, C. McDowell, and K. Kalahar. Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '09, pages 153--157, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[9]
P. Bazeley and K. Jackson. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications Limited, 2013.
[10]
T. Bell, P. Andreae, and A. Robins. A case study of the introduction of computer science in NZ schools. Trans. Comput. Educ., 14(2):10:1--10:31, 2014.
[11]
M. Biggers, A. Brauer, and T. Yilmaz. Student perceptions of computer science: A retention study comparing graduating seniors with CS leavers. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '08, pages 402--406, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
[12]
N. C. C. Brown, S. Sentance, T. Crick, and S. Humphreys. Restart: The resurgence of computer science in UK schools. Trans. Comput. Educ., 14(2):9:1--9:22, June 2014.
[13]
T. Camp. The incredible shrinking pipeline. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(3):129--134, 1997.
[14]
S. Cheryan, A. Master, and A. N. Meltzoff. Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls' interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in psychology, 6:49, 2015.
[15]
S. Cheryan, V. C. Plaut, P. G. Davies, and C. M. Steele. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of personality and social psychology, 97(6):1045, 2009.
[16]
Code.org. Updated CS "counts" list. Retrieved September 10, 2016, from: http://bit.ly/1dThUxl, 2016.
[17]
J. P. Cohoon. An introductory course format for promoting diversity and retention. SIGCSE Bull., 39(1):395--399, Mar. 2007.
[18]
S. J. Correll. Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American journal of Sociology, 106(6):1691--1730, 2001.
[19]
A. Craig. Theorising about gender and computing interventions through an evaluation framework. Information Systems Journal, 1, 2015.
[20]
A. Craig, J. Fisher, H. Forgasz, and C. Lang. Evaluation framework underpinning the digital divas programme. ITiCSE '11, Darmstadt, Germany, pages 313--317, 2011.
[21]
Q. Cutts, E. Cutts, S. Draper, P. O'Donnell, and P. Saffrey. Manipulating mindset to positively influence introductory programming performance. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 431--435. ACM, 2010.
[22]
B. J. Drury, J. O. Siy, and S. Cheryan. When do female role models benefit women? the importance of differentiating recruitment from retention in stem. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4):265--269, 2011.
[23]
W. DuBow, I. Vakalis, M. Perez-Quinones, and J. T. Black. Growing female undergraduate enrollments in computer science: What is the secret? In Proceedings of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 377--378. ACM, 2013.
[24]
C. Dweck. Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House, 2006.
[25]
Eduteka. http://eduteka.icesi.edu.co/modulos/9.
[26]
R. Eglash, J. E. Gilbert, and E. Foster. Toward culturally responsive computing education. Commun. ACM, 56(7):33--36, July 2013.
[27]
K. Falkner. CSER digital technologies education. page http://csermoocs.adelaide.edu.au, 2016.
[28]
C. Frieze and J. Quesenberry. Kicking Butt in Computer Science: Women in Computing at Carnegie Mellon University. Dog Ear Publishing, LLC, Nov 2015.
[29]
J. Gal-Ezer and C. Stephenson. A tale of two countries: Successes and challenges in K-12 computer science education in Israel and the United States. Trans. Comput. Educ., 14(2):8:1--8:18, 2014.
[30]
Google. Women who choose computer science---what really matters: The critical role of encouragement and exposure. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from: https://goo.gl/rLX6ax, May 2014.
[31]
P. C. Gorski. Stages of multicultural curriculum transformation. Retrieved July 12, 2016, from: http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/curriculum/steps.html.
[32]
Y. Gradskova. Regional ombudsmen, human rights and women --- gender aspects of the social and legal transformation in north-west Russia (based on ombudsman reports). The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 39(1):84--109, 2012.
[33]
B. Harvey. The beauty and joy of computing: Computer science for everyone. In Proceedings of Constructionism: Theory, Practice and Impact 2012, pages 33--39. Constructionism, 2012.
[34]
G. Hofstede. Dimensionalizing cultures: The hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1):8, 2011.
[35]
H. H. Hu, C. Heiner, and J. McCarthy. Deploying exploring computer science statewide. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, SIGCSE '16, pages 72--77, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM.
[36]
Y. Kafai, K. Searle, C. Martinez, and B. Brayboy. Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: Culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in american indian youth and communities. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '14, pages 241--246, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[37]
C. Lang, A. Craig, and M. Egan. The importance of outreach programs to unblock the pipeline and broaden diversity in ICT education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 12:38--49, 2016.
[38]
C. Lang, J. Fisher, A. Craig, and H. Forgasz. Outreach programmes to attract girls into computing: How the best laid plans can sometimes fail. Computer Science Education, 25:257--275, 2015.
[39]
S.-J. Leslie, A. Cimpian, M. Meyer, and E. Freeland. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219):262--265, 2015.
[40]
A. Luxton-Reilly. Learning to program is easy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '16, pages 284--289, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM.
[41]
C. Magno and I. Silova. Teaching in transition: Examining school-based gender inequities in central/southeastern europe and the former soviet union. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(6):647--660, 2007.
[42]
J. Margolis, J. Goode, G. Chapman, and J. J. Ryoo. That classroom 'magic'. Commun. ACM, 57(7):31--33, July 2014.
[43]
M. R. Meelissen and M. Drent. Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3):969--985, 2008.
[44]
S. Mladenović, Ž. Žanko, and M. Mladenović. Elementary students' motivation towards informatics course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174:3780--3787, 2015.
[45]
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Full-time and part-time faculty and instructional staff in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity, sex, and program area: Fall 1998 and fall 2003. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_315.80.asp, 2003.
[46]
National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT). http://www.ncwit.org/.
[47]
National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT). Stereotypes and stereotype threat affect computing students. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from: http://www.ncwit.org/stereotypethreatslides, 2013.
[48]
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Science and engineering degrees: 1966--2012. detailed statistical tables NSF 15-326. Technical Report NSF 15--326, June 2015.
[49]
M. Noland, T. Moran, and B. R. Kotschwar. Is gender diversity profitable? Evidence from a global survey. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper, (16-3), 2016.
[50]
OECD. Education at a Glance 2014. OECD Publishing, 2014.
[51]
Program.AR. http://program.ar/.
[52]
P. Pruet, C. S. Ang, and D. Farzin. Understanding tablet computer usage among primary school students in underdeveloped areas: Students' technology experience, learning styles and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, Part B:1131--1144, 2016.
[53]
E. S. Roberts, M. Kassianidou, and L. Irani. Encouraging women in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2):84, 2002.
[54]
C. Ryan and C. Hepler. CISters: A support network for women in computer information systems. In Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education, 2015.
[55]
D. W. Salter and A. Persaud. Women's views of the factors that encourage and discourage classroom participation. Journal of College Student Development, 44(6):831--844, 2003.
[56]
C. Seron, S. S. Silbey, E. Cech, and B. Rubineau. Persistence is cultural professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 43(2):178--214, 2016.
[57]
S. Sillessi, C. Varol, and H. Varol. Non-computer science majored women students perspective on a pictorial programming environment. 7(2), 2013.
[58]
I. Silova. Varieties of Educational Transformation: The Post-Socialist States of Central/Southeastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, pages 295--320. Springer Netherlands, 2009.
[59]
A. Smolentseva. Science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Issues of educational policy in Russia. Retrieved December 1, 2016, from: http://www.acola.org.au/index.php/stem-consultants-reports, 2013.
[60]
E. Tezci. Turkish primary school teachers' perceptions of school culture regarding ict integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(3):429--443, 2011.
[61]
L. Thompson, C. Eney, R. David, and T. Grady. Recruit and retain women in undergraduate computing: Success stories using research-based practices. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 541--542. ACM, 2014.
[62]
E. M. Trauth, J. L. Quesenberry, and A. J. Morgan. Understanding the under representation of women in it: Toward a theory of individual differences. In Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Careers, culture, and ethics in a networked environment, pages 114--119. ACM, 2004.
[63]
UNESCO. Enfoque estratégico sobre tics en educación en américa latina y el caribe. Enfoque Estratégico Sobre Tics En Educación En América Latina Y El Caribe, page 62, 2013.
[64]
US Department of Labor. Gender shares of employment in computer and information technology occupations 2014 annual averages. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from: https://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/gender_shares_emp_comp_it_2014.htm, 2014.
[65]
R. Varma and D. Kapur. Decoding femininity in computer science in india. Commun. ACM, 58(5):56--62, Apr. 2015.
[66]
T. Vassallo, E. Levy, M. Madansky, H. Mickell, B. Porter, M. Leas, and J. Oberweis. Elephant in the valley. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from: http://www.elephantinthevalley.com/.
[67]
I. Vekiri. Boys and girls ICT beliefs: Do teachers matter? Computers & Education, 55(1):16--23, 2010.
[68]
J. Wolfe and B. A. Powell. Not all curves are the same: Left-of-center grading and student motivation. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, number 10.18260/p.24527, Seattle, Washington, June 2015. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/24527.
[69]
Women in Science & Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI). http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
[70]
Y. Yang, L. Zhang, J. Zeng, X. Pang, F. Lai, and S. Rozelle. Computers and the academic performance of elementary school-aged girls in China's poor communities. Computers and Education, 60(1):335--346, 2013.
[71]
G. Zaharija, S. Mladenović, and I. Boljat. Use of robots and tangible programming for informal computer science introduction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174:3878--3884, 2015.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Analysis of Strategies to Attract Female Talent in the Software Development IndustrySustainability10.3390/su1616676116:16(6761)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2022)A Decade of Demographics in Computing Education Research: A Critical Review of Trends in Collection, Reporting, and UseProceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3501385.3543967(323-343)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Gender Equity in Computing: International Faculty Perceptions and Current Practices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ITiCSE '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ITiCSE Working Group Reports
    July 2016
    138 pages
    ISBN:9781450348829
    DOI:10.1145/3024906
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 09 July 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Computer Science
    2. Diversity
    3. Equity
    4. Female
    5. Female Enrolments
    6. Gender
    7. Gender Equity
    8. Gender Equity Programs
    9. Information Systems
    10. Information Technology
    11. Software Engineering
    12. Women
    13. Women in Computing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ITiCSE '16
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ITiCSE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 7 of 11 submissions, 64%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

    Upcoming Conference

    ITiCSE '25
    Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
    June 27 - July 2, 2025
    Nijmegen , Netherlands

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Analysis of Strategies to Attract Female Talent in the Software Development IndustrySustainability10.3390/su1616676116:16(6761)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
    • (2022)A Decade of Demographics in Computing Education Research: A Critical Review of Trends in Collection, Reporting, and UseProceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3501385.3543967(323-343)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Latin American Women and Computer Science: A Systematic Literature MappingIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2021.311546065:3(356-372)Online publication date: Aug-2022
    • (2020)Is the Gender Gap Narrowing in Higher Education Computing Studies? The Case of Norway, Spain, and TunisiaIEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje10.1109/RITA.2020.303321115:4(336-343)Online publication date: Nov-2020
    • (2019)Gender diversity among computing studentsProceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1145/3362789.3362796(196-200)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2019
    • (2019)"I Impressed Myself With How Confident I Felt"Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3287324.3287478(1081-1087)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2019
    • (2019)Identifying Pathways to Computer ScienceACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/328307019:3(1-30)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2019
    • (2019)Secure Coding and Ethical Hacking Workshops with NAO for Engaging K-12 Female Students in CS2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)10.1109/RESPECT46404.2019.8985682(1-2)Online publication date: Feb-2019
    • (2019)A Global Perspective on Women in Information TechnologyCracking the Digital Ceiling10.1017/9781108609081.003(46-60)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2019

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media