skip to main content
research-article

Critical Realism as a Sociomaterial Stream of Research

Published:13 December 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Niemimaa (2016) argues that agential realism (Barad 2003) represents a radical form of sociomateriality (Cecez-Kecmanovic et al. 2014a; Orlikowski and Scott 2008) and that critical realism (Bhaskar 1979; Bhaskar 1997) represents a conservative form of sociomateriality and attempts to bring to the foreground the differences in the approaches so as to avoid inappropriate "theoretical mélanges." This response argues that critical realism is not properly part of the sociomaterial stream of research as it violates the five basic notions of sociomateriality (Jones 2014). It further suggests that given the criticisms of Mutch (2013) and Leonardi (2013) as confirmed by Scott and Orlikowski (2013) of Agential Realism represent significant issues that compromise the usefulness of agential realism for IS research. Nevertheless, it is important that whatever paradigm is chosen, it is important to use it faithfully to its meta-theoretical commitments.

References

  1. Archer, M. S. 1982. "Morphogenesis Versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action," The British Journal of Sociology (33:4), pp. 455--483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Archer, M. S. 1988. Culture and Agency, the Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, M. S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer, M. S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Barad, K. 2003. "Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.," Signs (28:3), pp. 801--83Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism, (1st ed.). Brighton, Sussex: The Harvester Press Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhaskar, R. 1997. A Realist Theory of Science, (2nd ed.). London: Verso.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhaskar, R. 1998. "Critical Realism and Dialectic," in Critical Realism: Essential Readings, M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, C. Lawon and A. Norrie (eds.). London: Routledge, pp. 589--640.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, R. D., Henfrisson, O., Newell, S., and Vidgen, R. 2014a. "The Sociomateriality of Information Systems: Current Status, Future Directions," MIS Quarterly (38:3), pp. 809--830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Kautz, K., and Abrahall, R. 2014b. "Reframing Success and Failure of Information Systems: A Performative Perspective," Mis Quarterly (38:2), pp. 561--588. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Collier, A. 1994. "Critical Realism: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Roy Bhaskar." London: Verso.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanseth, O. 2005. "Beyond Metaphysics and Theory Consumerism," Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (17:1), pp. 159--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, M. 2014. "A Matter of Life and Death: Exploring Conceptualizations of Sociomateriality in the Context of Critical Care," MIS Quarterly (38:3), pp. 895--925. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kuhn, T. S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lawson, C. 2008. "An Ontology of Technology: Artefacts, Relations and Functions," in: Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Technological University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Leonardi, P. M. 2011. "When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies," MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 147--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Leonardi, P. M. 2012. "Materiality, Sociomateriality, and Socio-Technical Systems: What Do These Terms Mean? How Are They Related? Do We Need Them?," in Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi and J. Kallinkos (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Leonardi, P. M. 2013. "Theoretical Foundations for the Study of Sociomateriality," Information and Organization (23), pp. 59--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Leonardi, P. M., and Barley, S. R. 2008. "Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory About Technology and Organizing," Information and Organization (18), pp. 159--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mingers, J. 2004. "Real-Izing Information Systems: Critical Realism as an Underpinning Philosophy for Information Systems," Information and Organization (14), pp. 87--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mingers, J. 2006. "A Critique of Statistical Modelling in Management Science from a Critical Realist Perspective: Its Role within Multimethodology," Journal of the Operational Research Society (57:2), pp. 202--219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mingers, J., Mutch, A., and Willcocks, L. 2013. "Critical Realism in Information Systems Research," MIS Quarterly (37:3), pp. 795--802. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mingers, J., and Willcocks, L. 2014. "An Integrative Semiotic Framework for Information Systems: The Social, Personal and Material Worlds," Information and Organization (24:1), pp. 48--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mutch, A. 2013. "Sociomateriality - Taking the Wrong Turning?," Information and Organization (23), pp. 28--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Niemimaa, M. 2016. "Sociomateriality and Information Systems Research: Quantum Radicals and Cartesian Conservatives," The Data Base for the Advances in Information Systems (47:4). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Scott, S. V., and Orlikowski, W. J. 2013. "Sociomateriality -- Taking the Wrong Turning? A Response to Mutch," Information and Organization (23), pp. 77--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Truex, D., Holmstrom, J., and Keil, M. 2006. "Theorizing in Information Systems Research: A Reflexive Analysis of the Adaptation of Theory in Information," Journal of the Association for Information Systems (7:12), pp. 797--821.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Zachariadis, M., Scott, S., and Barrett, M. 2013. "Methodological Implications of Critical Realism for Mixed-Methods Research," MIS Quarterly (37:3). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Critical Realism as a Sociomaterial Stream of Research

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
      ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 47, Issue 4
      November 2016
      101 pages
      ISSN:0095-0033
      EISSN:1532-0936
      DOI:10.1145/3025099
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 December 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader