Amany R. Elbanna
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
This paper agrees with Mueller et al.'s (2016) view that researchers who want to adopt a sociomaterial approach often find themselves confused regarding research methods. However, it departs from Mueller's et al. suggestion to seek guidance from the structural-functionalist approach of Parsons' and Shils' (1951) General Theory of Action. The paper argues that finding a methodological framework for research following a sociomaterial approach has to be consistent with the philosophy, ontology and roots of this approach and that it is limiting to read the post-human approach of sociomateriality through a structural-functionalist lens. The paper briefly reviews the roots of the sociomaterial approach in sociology and information systems and offers a methodological guidance based on Actor Network Theory (ANT) and post ANT/Feminist lenses.
- Aanestad, M., and Hanseth, O. (2000). "Implementing Open Network Technologies in Complex Work Practices: A Case from Telemedicine," IFIP 8.2, Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 355--369.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Akrich, M. (1992). "The De-Scription of Technical Objects," in Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, W.E. Bijker and J. Law (eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, pp. 205--224.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, C. J. (2000). "The 'Soft Information Systems and Technologies Methodology' (Sistem): An Actor Network Contingency Approach to Integrated Development," European Journal of Information Systems Vol. 9,, pp. pp.104--123. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bailey, K. D. (1990). Social Entropy Theory. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. duke university Press. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baskerville, R. L., and Myers, M. D. (2002). "Information Systems as a Reference Discipline," MIS Quarterly, pp. 1--14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bloomfield, B. P., Coombs, R., Knights, D., and Littler, D. (eds.). (1997). Information Technology and Organizations: Strategies, Networks, and Integration. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bloomfield, B. P., and Vurdubakis, T. (1997). "Paper Traces: Inscribing Organizations and Information Technology," in Information Technology and Organizations: Strategies, Networks, and Integration, B.P. Bloomfield, R. Coombs, D. Knights and D. Littler (eds.). Oxford University Press, pp. 85--11 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bloor, D. (1999). "Anti-Latour," Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 81--112. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cadili, S., and Whitley, E. A. (2005). "On the Interpretive Flexibility of Hosted ERP Systems," 131, Department of Information Systems, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London.Google Scholar
- Callon, M. (1987). "Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis," in The Social Construction of Technological Systems, W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds.). The MIT Press, pp. 83--103.Google Scholar
- Callon, M., and Latour, B. (1992). "Don't Throw the Baby out with the Bath School! A Reply to Collins and Yearley," Science as practice and culture Vol. 343, p. 368.Google Scholar
- Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Kautz, K., and Abrahall, R. (2014). "Reframing Success and Failure of Information Systems: A Performative Perspective," MIS Quarterly Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 561--588. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Collins, H. M., and Yearley, S. (1992a). "Epistemological Chicken," in Science as Practice and Culture, A. Pickering (ed.). Chicago: The Universty of Chicago Press, pp. 301--326.Google Scholar
- Collins, H. M., and Yearley, S. (1992b). "Journey into Space," in Science as Practice and Culture, A. Pickering (ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 369--389.Google Scholar
- Cooper, R., and Foster, M. (1971). "Sociotechnical Systems," American Psychologist Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 467- 474. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elbanna, A. (2009a). "Actor Network Theory and Is Research," Handbook of research on contemporary theoretical models in information systems, pp. 403--419. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elbanna, A. (2010). "Rethinking IS Project Boundaries in Practice: A Multiple-Projects Perspective," Journal of Strategic Information Systems Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 39--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elbanna, A. (2013). "Top Management Support in Multiple-Project Environments: An in Practice View," European Journal of Information Systems Vol. 22, pp. 278--294. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elbanna, A. R. (2009b). "Rigid Technology and Improvised Implementation: The Case of ERP Systems," in Bricolage, Care and Information Systems : Claudio Ciborra's Legacy in Information Systems Research C. Avgerou, G.F. Lanzara and L.P. Willcocks (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan pp. Chapter 15, 547--574. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Faulkner, P., and Runde, J. (2012). On Sociomateriality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hanseth, O., and Braa, K. (1998). "Technology as Traitor: Emergent Sap Infrastructure in a Global Organization," Nineteenth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), R. Hirschheim, M. Newman and J.I. DeGross (eds.), Helsinki, Finland, pp. 188--196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hanseth, O., and Monteiro, E. (1997). "Inscribing Behaviour in Information Infrastructure Standards," Accounting, Management and Information Technology Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 183--211. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hirschheim, R. A. (1992). "Information Systems Epistemology: An Historical Perspective," in Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practice Guidelines, R. Galliers (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
- Jones, M. (2014). "A Matter of Life and Death: Exploring Conceptualizations of Sociomateriality in the Context of Critical Care," MIS Quarterly Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 895--925. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kautz, K., and Jensen, T. B. (2013). "Sociomateriality at the Royal Court of Is: A Jester's Monologue," Information and Organization Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 15--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klischewski, R. (2000). "Systems Development as Networking," Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Long Beach, CA, pp. 1638--1644.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the Love of Technology. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Law, J. (1992). "Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity," Systems Practice Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 379--393. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Law, J., and Callon, M. (1988). "Engineering and Sociology in a Military Aircraft Project: A Network Analysis of Technological Change," Social Problems Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 284--297. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee, N., and Brown, S. (1994). "Otherness and the Actor Network," American Behavioral Scientists Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 772--790. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leonardi, P. M. (2013). "Theoretical Foundations for the Study of Sociomateriality," Information and Organization Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 59--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A., and Kallinikos, J. (2012). Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford University Press on Demand. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lilley, S. (1998). "Regarding Screens for Surveillance of the System," Accounting, Management and Information Technology Vol. 8, pp. 63--105. Google ScholarCross Ref
- McGrath, K. (2001). "The Golden Circle: A Case Study of Organizational Change at the London Ambulance Service (Case Study)," The 9 th European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia, pp. 1137--1148.Google Scholar
- Mol, A. (1999). "Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions," The Sociological Review Vol. 47, No. S1, pp. 74--89. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mol, A., and Berg, M. (1998). "Differences in Medicine: An Introduction," Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies, pp. 1--12.Google Scholar
- Mumford, E. (1966). "Computer Technology; Dilemmas of a New Role," Journal of Management Studies Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 244--255. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mumford, E. (1976). "Towards the Democratic Design of Work System," Personnel Management Vol. 8, No. 9.Google Scholar
- Mumford, E., and Banks, O. (1967). The Computer and the Clerk. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Mutch, A. (2013). "Sociomateriality--Taking the Wrong Turning?," Information and Organization Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 28--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). "Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work," Organization studies Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 1435--1448. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Orlikowski, W. J., and Scott, S. V. (2008). "10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization," The academy of management annals Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 433--474. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Orlikowski, W. J., and Scott, S. V. (2013). "What Happens When Evaluation Goes Online? Exploring Apparatuses of Valuation in the Travel Sector," Organization Science Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 868--891. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parsons, T., Bales, R. F., and Shils, E. A. (1953). Working Papers in the Theory of Action. Glencoe, Ill., Free P.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T., and Shils, E. (1951a). Toward a General Theory of Social Action.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T. E., and Shils, E. A. (eds.). (1951b). Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T. E., and Shils, E. A. (eds.). (1951c). Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Schaffer, S. (1991). "The Eighteenth Brumaire of Bruno Latour," Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 174--192. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott, S. V., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2009). "'Getting the Truth': Exploring the Material Grounds of Institutional Dynamics in Social Media," Department of Management, Information Systems Group, London School of Economics and Political Science Vol. Working Papers Series, No. 177.Google Scholar
- Scott, S. V., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2012). "Reconfiguring Relations of Accountability: Materialization of Social Media in the Travel Sector," Accounting, organizations and society Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 26--40. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott, S. V., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2014). "Entanglements in Practice: Performing Anonymity through Social Media," MIS Quarterly Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 873--893. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smelser, N. J. (2001). "Introduction to the Transction Edition," in Towards a General Theory of Action: Theoritical Foundation for the Social Sciences. New Brunswick: Tranaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. (2002). "Located Accountabilities in Technology Production," Scandinavian journal of information systems Vol. 14, No. 2, p. 7. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suchman, L. (2003). Figuring 'Service' in Discourses of Ict: The Case of Software Agents. Springer.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. (2006). "Reconfiguring Human-Robot Relations," Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. The 15th IEEE International Symposium on: IEEE, pp. 652--654. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suchman, L., Trigg, R., and Blomberg, J. (2002). "Working Artefacts: Ethnomethods of the Prototype," The British journal of sociology Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 163--179. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Swanson, G. E. (1953). "The Approch to a General Theory of Action by Parsons and Shils," American Sociological Review, pp. 125--134. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Swatos Jr, W. H. (2010). "Book Review: Toward a General Theory of Action: Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences, by Talcott Parsons and Edward Shils, 3rd Edn. Edison, Nj: Transaction Publishers, 2007 {2001}." Implicit Religion Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 361--366.Google Scholar
- Trist, E. L., and Bamforth, K. W. (1951). "Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting: An Examination of the Psychological Situation and Defences of a Work Group in Relation to the Social Structure and Technological Content of the Work System," Human relations Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 3--38. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vidgen, R., and McMaster, T. (1996). "Black Boxes, Non-Human Stakeholders and the Translation of It through Mediation," in Information Technology and Change in Organizational Work, W.J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M.R. Jones and J.I. De Gross (eds.). London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 250--271.Google Scholar
- Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weick, K. E. (1984). "Theoritical Assumptions and Research Methodology Selection," in The Information Systems Research Challenge, F.W. McFarlan (ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Haravard Business School Press, pp. 111--132.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Doing Sociomateriality Research in Information Systems
Recommendations
Returning to the Philosophical Roots of Sociomateriality: How M. Heidegger and M. McLuhan Questioned Information Communication Technology
Sociomateriality is a growing research stream in the field of IS. In response to an increasingly complex and interconnected world, sociomateriality researchers have proposed a view of relational ontological fusion. This view transcends the conventional ...
Sociomateriality and Information Systems Research: Quantum Radicals and Cartesian Conservatives
This paper provides an elaboration and comparison of two main streams of "sociomateriality" research within Information Systems (IS) discipline. Through the rapid and controversial emergence of discussions around sociomateriality, IS research has become ...
Strong versus Weak Sociomateriality: Neither Subordinate nor Privileged- A rejoinder to "New Technology and the Post-human self: Rethinking Appropriation and Resistance"
This rejoinder discusses the essay by Ramiller (2016) entitled "New Technology and the Post-human self: Rethinking Appropriation and Resistance" which aims at exploring the implications of a sociomaterial perspective for people's practical encounters ...
Comments