Shirley Ou Yang
Abstract
Sociomateriality is a growing research stream in the field of IS. In response to an increasingly complex and interconnected world, sociomateriality researchers have proposed a view of relational ontological fusion. This view transcends the conventional framework of assuming a clear distinction between the social and the material. In this paper, we argue that the fundamental difference between sociomateriality and the conventional view lies on the ontological level, not on the epistemological or methodological levels. But without a return to its philosophical roots, sociomateriality remains obscure and confusing. To better inform researchers, we return to the original works of two Western philosophers, Heidegger and McLuhan, who both share the view of ontological fusion in proposing their arguments on how the entanglement of technology and the human agent precludes access to a primordial truth. In this paper, we reflect on these philosophical works, providing a solid foundation for this new approach. We argue that the sociomateriality approach can open the black box of the epistemological bias that stems from habitual systemic thinking. This study contributes to the less-researched area of unintentional consequences of technology. The paper also provides practical, alternative methods that can help in furthering this approach in future studies.
- Beck, U. (1999).World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ciborra, C. (2006). "Imbriction of Representations: Risk and Digital Technologies." Journal of Information Management Studies, Vol. 43, No.6: pp. 1339--1356.Google Scholar
- Ciborra, C. and Associates. (2001). From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. NY: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Descartes, R. {1641} (2008).Meditations on First Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
- Downes, L. (2009). The Laws of Disruption: Harnessing the New Forces That Govern Life and Business in the Digital Age. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Dreyfus, H.L. (1993). "Heidegger on Connection between Nihilism, Art, Technology, and Politics." The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, ed., Guignon, C., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 289--316. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elovaara, P. (2004).Angels in Unstable Sociomaterial Relations: Stories of Information Technology. Doctoral thesis in Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Ewenstein, B. and Whyte, J. (2007). "Beyond Words: Aesthetic Knowledge and Knowing in Organizations." Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No.5: pp. 689--708. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Giddens, A. (1984).The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (2011). Runaway World. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
- Hanseth, O. (2001). "The Economics of Standards," From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. Ed., Ciborra, C. and the Associates, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 64--66.Google Scholar
- Heidegger, M. {1954} (1977)."Question Concerning Technology," The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Heidegger, M. (1962).Being and Time. NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- ITU. (2015). "ICT Facts & Figures: The World in 2015." ICT Data and Statistics Division Telecommunication Development Bureau International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Mårtensson, P. and Lee, A. S. (2004). "Dialogical Action Research at Omega Corporation," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3: pp. 507--536. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Monteiro, E. H. and Hanseth, Ø. (1995). "Social Shaping of Information Infrastructure: On Being Specific About the Technology," Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, ed. Orlikowski, W. Walsham, G., Jones, M. R. and Gross, J. I, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 325--343.Google Scholar
- McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- McLuhan, M. and McLuhan, E. (1992). Laws of Media: The New Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995).The Knowledge-Creating Company. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Nonaka, I. and Toyama, R. (2003). "The Knowledge-Creating Theory Revisited: Knowledge Creation as a Synthesizing Process." Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Vol.1: pp. 2--10. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Orlikowski, W. (2007). "Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work." Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No.9: pp.1435--1448. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Orlikowski, W. (2000). "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations." Organization Science, Vol. 11, No.4: pp.404--428. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Orlikowski, W. (2002)."Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing." Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 3: pp. 249--273. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Orlikowski, W. and Scott, S. (2008). "Chapter 10: Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization." The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 2, No.1: pp. 433--474. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pind, J. (2013). Edgar Rubin and Psychology in Denmark: Figure and Ground (History and Philosophy of Psychology). NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Scott, S. and Orlikowski, W. (2009)."Getting the Truth: Exploring the Material Grounds of Institutional Dynamics in Social Media." Working Paper Series, 177, Department of Management, Information Systems Group, London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
- Schultze, U. and Orlikowski, W. (2004) "A Practice Perspective on Technology-mediated Network Relations: the Use of Internet-based Self-serve Technologies."Information System Research, Vol. 15, No. 1:pp.87--106. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shaprio, C. and Varian, H. (1999). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sass, H-M. (1982). Martin Heidegger: Bibliography and Glossary. Ohio: Mark A. Philosophy Document Center.Google Scholar
- Shields, M. (1997). "Reinventing Technology in Social Theory," Current Perspectives in Social Theory, ed. Lehmann, J., Vol.17, CT: JAI, Greenwich, pp.187--216.Google Scholar
- Schwanen, T. (2008). "Managing Uncertain Arrival TimesThrough Sociomaterial networks," Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 35: pp. 997--101 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Winner, L. (1977).Autonomous Technology: Technics-Out-of-Control as a Theme. Cambridge: Political Thought. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Zack, M. (1999)."Developing a Knowledge Strategy." California Management Review, Vol.41, No.3: pp. 125--143. Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Returning to the Philosophical Roots of Sociomateriality: How M. Heidegger and M. McLuhan Questioned Information Communication Technology
Recommendations
Doing Sociomateriality Research in Information Systems
This paper agrees with Mueller et al.'s (2016) view that researchers who want to adopt a sociomaterial approach often find themselves confused regarding research methods. However, it departs from Mueller's et al. suggestion to seek guidance from the ...
Critical Realism as a Sociomaterial Stream of Research
Niemimaa (2016) argues that agential realism (Barad 2003) represents a radical form of sociomateriality (Cecez-Kecmanovic et al. 2014a; Orlikowski and Scott 2008) and that critical realism (Bhaskar 1979; Bhaskar 1997) represents a conservative form of ...
Sociomateriality and Information Systems Research: Quantum Radicals and Cartesian Conservatives
This paper provides an elaboration and comparison of two main streams of "sociomateriality" research within Information Systems (IS) discipline. Through the rapid and controversial emergence of discussions around sociomateriality, IS research has become ...
Comments