skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025468acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Structured Input Improves Usability and Precision for Solving Geometry-based Algebraic Problems

Published: 02 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Previous research has shown that sketch-based input is efficient and preferable in the context of algebraic equation solving. However, research has not been conducted to evaluate whether this holds true when involving geometry input to facilitate quantitative problem-solving. We developed a bimodal (graphing geometric shapes and writing algebraic expressions) user interface, in order to conduct a within-subject, controlled experiment with 24 college students and varied two types of geometry input: 1) sketch-based input and 2) structured input. The sketch-based input was significantly faster than the structured input, but there were no significant differences based on perception and cognition. However, after a post-hoc analysis, we found a significant interaction effect on perception between prior knowledge and geometry input. Novice students preferred the sketch-based input, but advanced students preferred the structured input. Our study implies that natural sketch-based input may be less preferable than structured input for geometry-based interfaces toward math problem-solving.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (pn1048-file4.zip)
suppl.mov (pn1048p.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Christine Alvarado and Randall Davis. 2004. SketchREAD: a multi-domain sketch recognition engine. In Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 23--32.
[2]
Lisa Anthony and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2010. A lightweight multistroke recognizer for user interface prototypes. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010. Canadian Information Processing Society, 245--252.
[3]
Lisa Anthony, Jie Yang, and Kenneth R Koedinger. 2012. A paradigm for handwriting-based intelligent tutors. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, 11 (2012), 866--887.
[4]
Caroline Appert and Shumin Zhai. 2009. Using Strokes As Command Shortcuts: Cognitive Benefits and Toolkit Support. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2289--2298.
[5]
Seok-Hyung Bae, Ravin Balakrishnan, and Karan Singh. 2008. ILoveSketch: As-natural-as-possible Sketching System for Creating 3D Curve Models. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 151--160.
[6]
Olivier Bau and Wendy E. Mackay. 2008. OctoPocus: A Dynamic Guide for Learning Gesture-based Command Sets. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 37--46.
[7]
Eveline J. Bellegarda, Jerome R. Bellegarda, David Nahamoo, and Krishna S Nathan. 1994. A fast statistical mixture algorithm for on-line handwriting recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 16, 12 (1994), 1227--1233.
[8]
Eric P Bettinger and Bridget Terry Long. 2009. Addressing the Needs of Underprepared Students in Higher Education Does College Remediation Work? Journal of Human resources 44, 3 (2009), 736--771.
[9]
Christopher M Bishop, Markus Svensen, and Goeffrey E Hinton. 2004. Distinguishing text from graphics in on-line handwritten ink. In IWFHR, Vol. 4. 142--147.
[10]
Harry N Boone and Deborah A Boone. 2012. Analyzing likert data. Journal of extension 50, 2 (2012), 1--5.
[11]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[12]
James Dean Brown. 2011. Likert items and scales of measurement. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter 1 (2011), 10--14.
[13]
Peter Brusilovsky and Christoph Peylo. 2003. Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED) 13 (2003), 159--172.
[14]
James Carifio and Rocco J Perla. 2007. Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences 3, 3 (2007), 106--116.
[15]
Salman Cheema, Sumit Gulwani, and Joseph LaViola. 2012. QuickDraw: improving drawing experience for geometric diagrams. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1037--1064.
[16]
Salman Cheema and Joseph LaViola. 2012. PhysicsBook: a sketch-based interface for animating physics diagrams. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 51--60.
[17]
Matthias Ehmann, M Gerhauser, Carsten Miller, and Alfred Wassermann. 2013. Sketchometry and jsxgraph-dynamic geometry for mobile devices. South Bohemia Mathematical Letters 21, 1 (2013), 1--7.
[18]
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, and Axel Buchner. 2007. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods 39, 2 (2007), 175--191.
[19]
Kenneth D Forbus, Ronald W Ferguson, and Jeffery M Usher. 2001. Towards a computational model of sketching. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 77--83.
[20]
Jennifer French, Martin A Segado, and Phillip Z Ai. Sketching Graphs in a Calculus MOOC: Preliminary Results. (????).
[21]
Gene V Glass, Percy D Peckham, and James R Sanders. 1972. Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of educational research 42, 3 (1972), 237--288.
[22]
Tracy Hammond and Randall Davis. 2007. LADDER, a Sketching Language for User Interface Developers. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Courses (SIGGRAPH '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 35.
[23]
Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology 52 (1988), 139--183.
[24]
Mary Ann Huntley, Robin Marcus, Jeremy Kahan, and Jane Lincoln Miller. 2007. Investigating high-school studentsÕ reasoning strategies when they solve linear equations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 26, 2 (2007), 115--139.
[25]
Takeo Igarashi, Satoshi Matsuoka, Sachiko Kawachiya, and Hidehiko Tanaka. 1997. Interactive Beautification: A Technique for Rapid Geometric Design. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '97). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 105--114.
[26]
Takeo Igarashi, Satoshi Matsuoka, and Hidehiko Tanaka. 1999. Teddy: A Sketching Interface for 3D Freeform Design. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '99). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., NY, NY, USA, 409--416.
[27]
Susan Jamieson and others. 2004. Likert scales: how to (ab) use them. Medical education 38, 12 (2004), 1217--1218.
[28]
Yingying Jiang, Feng Tian, Hongan Wang, Xiaolong Zhang, Xugang Wang, and Guozhong Dai. 2010. Intelligent understanding of handwritten geometry theorem proving. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 119--128.
[29]
Shaun K. Kane, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2011. Usable Gestures for Blind People: Understanding Preference and Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 413--422.
[30]
Kenneth R Koedinger, John R Anderson, William H Hadley, and Mary A Mark. 1997. Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. (1997).
[31]
Per Ola Kristensson and Shumin Zhai. 2007. Command Strokes with and Without Preview: Using Pen Gestures on Keyboard for Command Selection. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1137--1146.
[32]
James A Landay and Brad A Myers. 1995. Interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 43--50.
[33]
Yang Li. 2010. Protractor: a fast and accurate gesture recognizer. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2169--2172.
[34]
Rensis Likert. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology (1932).
[35]
Arnold M Lund. 2001. Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability interface 8, 2 (2001), 3--6.
[36]
I Scott MacKenzie. 1992. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-computer interaction 7, 1 (1992), 91--139.
[37]
Erica Melis, Eric Andres, Jochen Budenbender, Adrian Frischauf, George Goduadze, Paul Libbrecht, Martin Pollet, and Carsten Ullrich. 2001. ActiveMath: A generic and adaptive web-based learning environment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED) 12 (2001), 385--407.
[38]
Pam A Mueller and Daniel M Oppenheimer. 2014. The pen is mightier than the keyboard advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological science (2014), 0956797614524581.
[39]
Tom Y. Ouyang and Randall Davis. 2011. ChemInk: A Natural Real-time Recognition System for Chemical Drawings. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 267--276.
[40]
Sharon Oviatt. 2013. Interfaces for Thinkers: Computer Input Capabilities That Support Inferential Reasoning. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 221--228.
[41]
Sharon Oviatt, Alex Arthur, and Julia Cohen. 2006. Quiet interfaces that help students think. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 191--200.
[42]
Sharon Oviatt, Kevin Hang, Jianlong Zhou, and Fang Chen. 2015. Spoken Interruptions Signal Productive Problem Solving and Domain Expertise in Mathematics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, 311--318.
[43]
Fred Paas, Juhani E Tuovinen, Huib Tabbers, and Pascal WM Van Gerven. 2003. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational psychologist 38, 1 (2003), 63--71.
[44]
Brandon Paulson and Tracy Hammond. 2008. Paleosketch: accurate primitive sketch recognition and beautification. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 1--10.
[45]
Elvira Popescu, Costin Badica, and Lucian Moraret. 2010. Accommodating learning styles in an adaptive educational system. Informatica 34, 4 (2010).
[46]
Peter D. Frisk R. David Gustafson. 1991. Elementary Geometry, 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[47]
Dean Harris Rubine. 1991. The automatic recognition of gestures. Ph.D. Dissertation. Citeseer.
[48]
J Reynaldo A Santos. 1999. CronbachÕs alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of extension 37, 2 (1999), 1--5.
[49]
Jeremy Scott and Randall Davis. 2013. Physink: sketching physical behavior. In Proceedings of the adjunct publication of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 9--10.
[50]
Jacob O. Wobbrock, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2009. User-defined Gestures for Surface Computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1083--1092.
[51]
Jacob O. Wobbrock, Andrew D. Wilson, and Yang Li. 2007. Gestures Without Libraries, Toolkits or Training: A $1 Recognizer for User Interface Prototypes. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 159--168.
[52]
Richard Zanibbi and Dorothea Blostein. 2012. Recognition and retrieval of mathematical expressions. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR) 15, 4 (2012), 331--357.
[53]
Robert C Zeleznik, Andrew Bragdon, Chu-Chi Liu, and Andrew Forsberg. 2008. Lineogrammer: creating diagrams by drawing. In Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 161--170.
[54]
Jianlong Zhou, Kevin Hang, Sharon Oviatt, Kun Yu, and Fang Chen. 2014. Combining empirical and machine learning techniques to predict math expertise using pen signal features. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics Workshop and Grand Challenge. ACM, 29--36.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Examining Interaction Modality Effects Toward Engagement in an Interactive Learning EnvironmentData Driven Approaches in Digital Education10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_8(97-110)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2017

Index Terms

  1. Structured Input Improves Usability and Precision for Solving Geometry-based Algebraic Problems

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 02 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. geometry editing
      2. gesture input
      3. math learning environment
      4. sketch input

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CHI '17
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 600 of 2,400 submissions, 25%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI 2025
      ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 26 - May 1, 2025
      Yokohama , Japan

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2017)Examining Interaction Modality Effects Toward Engagement in an Interactive Learning EnvironmentData Driven Approaches in Digital Education10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_8(97-110)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2017

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media