skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025642acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What Makes Live Events Engaging on Facebook Live, Periscope, and Snapchat

Published: 02 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Live streaming platforms bring events from all around the world to people's computing devices. We conducted a mixed methods study including interviews (N = 42) and a survey (N = 223) to understand how people currently experience events using Facebook Live, Periscope, and Snapchat Live Stories. We identified four dimensions that make remote event viewing engaging: immersion, immediacy, interaction, and sociality. We find that both live streams and the more curated event content found on Snapchat are immersive and immediate, yet Snapchat Live Stories enable quickly switching among different views of the event. Live streams, on the other hand, offer real time interaction and sociality in a way that Snapchat Live Stories do not. However, the interaction's impact depends on comment volume, comment content, and relationship between viewer and broadcaster. We describe how people experience events remotely using these social media, and identify design opportunities around detecting exciting content, leveraging multiple viewpoints, and enabling interactivity to create engaging user experiences for remotely participating in events.

References

[1]
KariAndén-Papadopoulos.2013.Citizencamera- witnessing: Embodied political dissent in the age of "mediated mass self-communication." New Media & Society: 1461444813489863. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813489863
[2]
Kari Andén-Papadopoulos. 201 Media witnessing and the "crowd-sourced video revolution." Visual Communication 12, 3: 341--357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357213483055
[3]
Salman Aslam. 2015. Periscope by the Numbers: Stats, Demographics & Fun Facts. http://www.omnicoreagency.com/periscope-statistics/
[4]
Tom Bartindale, Guy Schofield, and Peter Wright. 2016. Scaffolding Community Documentary Film Making Using Commissioning Templates. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 2705--2716. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858102
[5]
Joseph B. Bayer, Nicole B. Ellison, Sarita Y. Schoenebeck, and Emily B. Falk. 201 Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society 19, 7: 956--977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084349
[6]
Jed R. Brubaker, Gina Venolia, and John C. Tang. 2012. Focusing on Shared Experiences: Moving Beyond the Camera in Video Communication. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12), 96--105. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317973
[7]
caret. Recursive Feature Elimination. http://topepo.github.io/caret/rfe.html
[8]
Yung-Ju Chang and John C. Tang. 2015. Investigating Mobile Users' Ringer Mode Usage and Attentiveness and Responsiveness to Communication. 6--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785852
[9]
Josh Constine. 2016. Facebook Takes On Periscope By Giving Live Streaming To All U.S. iPhoners. https://techcrunch.com/2016/01/28/comfortable- ephemerality-vs-reach/
[10]
Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
[11]
Jordan Crook. 2014. Snapchat Launches Collaborative Timelines Based On Events. https://techcrunch.com/2014/06/17/snapchat-launches- collaborative-timelines-based-on-events/
[12]
Niloofar Dezuli, Jochen Huber, Elizabeth F. Churchill, and Max Muühlhäuser. 20 CoStream: Co-construction of Shared Experiences Through Mobile Live Video Sharing. In Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (BCS-HCI '13), 6:1--6:10. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2578048.2578057
[13]
Audubon Dougherty. 2011. Live-streaming Mobile Video: Production As Civic Engagement. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11), 425--434. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037437
[14]
Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students? Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 4: 1143--1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083--6101.2007.00367.x
[15]
Mattias Esbjörnsson, Barry Brown, Oskar Juhlin, Daniel Normark, Mattias Östergren, and Eric Laurier. 2006. Watching the cars go round and round: designing for active spectating. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, 1221--1224. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1124955
[16]
Facebook. 2016. Facebook Live Map. https://www.facebook.com/livemap
[17]
Elodie Fichet, John Robinson, Dharma Dailey, and Kate Starbird. 2016. Eyes on the Ground: Emerging Practices in Periscope Use during Crisis Events. In Proceedings of ISCRAM 2016. http://faculty.washington.edu/kstarbi/ISCRAM2016_Per iscope_FINAL.pdf
[18]
Robert S. Fish, Robert E. Kraut, and Barbara L. Chalfonte. 1990. The VideoWindow System in Informal Communication. In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '90), 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/99332.99335
[19]
Sarah Frier. Snapchat Passes Twitter in Daily Usage. Bloomberg.com. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06- 02/snapchat-passes-twitter-in-daily-usage
[20]
Sam Gregory. 2015. Ubiquitous witnesses: who creates the evidence and the live(d) experience of human rights violations? Information, Communication & Society 18, 11: 1378--1392. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1070891
[21]
William A. Hamilton, Oliver Garretson, and Andruid Kerne. 2014. Streaming on Twitch: Fostering Participatory Communities of Play Within Live Mixed Media. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1315--1324. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557048
[22]
William A. Hamilton, John Tang, Gina Venolia, Kori Inkpen, Jakob Zillner, and Derek Huang. 2016. Rivulet: Exploring Participation in Live Events Through Multi- Stream Experiences. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (TVX '16), 31--42. https://doi.org/10.1145/2932206.2932211
[23]
Gunnar Harboe, Crysta J. Metcalf, Frank Bentley, Joe Tullio, Noel Massey, and Guy Romano. 2008. Ambient social tv: drawing people into a shared experience. In Proceedings of CHI, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357056
[24]
Alex Heath. Here are all the times Facebook copied Snapchat in 2016. Business Insider. http://www.businessinsider.com/all-the-times-facebook- copied-snapchat-in-2016--2016--12
[25]
Jim Hollan and Scott Stornetta. 1992. Beyond Being There. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92), 119-- 125. https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142769
[26]
Y. Linlin Huang, Kate Starbird, Mania Orand, Stephanie A. Stanek, and Heather T. Pedersen. 2015. Connected Through Crisis: Emotional Proximity and the Spread of Misinformation Online. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 969--980. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675202
[27]
Gerald Iorio. 2016. #TrumpClimber. Periscope. https://www.periscope.tv/w/1vOxwpkOjYLKB
[28]
Giulio Jacucci, Antti Oulasvirta, Tommi Ilmonen, John Evans, and Antti Salovaara. 2007. Comedia: Mobile Group Media for Active Spectatorship. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), 1273--1282. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240817
[29]
Giulio Jacucci, Antti Oulasvirta, and Antti Salovaara. 2006. Active construction of experience through mobile media: a field study with implications for recording and sharing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 4: 215--234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0084--5
[30]
Oskar Juhlin, Arvid Engström, and Erika Reponen. 2010. Mobile broadcasting: the whats and hows of live video as a social medium. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, 35--44. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1851610
[31]
Hope King. 2016. Teens say Snapchat is "most important social network." CNNMoney. http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/13/technology/snapchat- instagram-facebook/index.html
[32]
Cliff Lampe, Nicole Ellison, and Charles Steinfield. 2006. A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '06), 167--170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180901
[33]
Ben Lenzner. 2014. The emergence of Occupy Wall Street and digital video practices: Tim Pool, live streaming and experimentations in citizen journalism. Studies in Documentary Film 8, 3: 251--266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2014.961634
[34]
Jessa Lingel and Mor Naaman. 2012. You should have been there, man: Live music, DIY content and online communities. New Media & Society 14, 2: 332--349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811417284
[35]
Matthew K. Miller, John C. Tang, Gina Venolia, Gerard Wilkinson, and Kori Inkpen. 2017. Conversational Chat Circles: Being All Here Without Having to Hear It All. In Proceedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[36]
Ahmed E. Mostafa, Kori Inkpen, John C. Tang, Gina Venolia, and William A. Hamilton. 2016. SocialStreamViewer: Guiding the Viewer Experience of Multiple Streams of an Event. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '16), 287--291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957286
[37]
David Nield. 2014. Our Story event streams go live for all Snapchat users. Digital Trends. http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/story-event- streams-go-live-snapchat-users/
[38]
Andreas Nilsson, Urban Nulden, and Daniel Olsson. 2004. Spectator Information Support: Exploring the Context of Distributed Events. In The Interaction Society: Practice, Theories and Supportive Technologies: Practice, Theories and Supportive Technologies. Idea Group Inc (IGI).
[39]
Heather L. O'Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2008. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 6: 938--955. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801
[40]
Heather L. O'Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2010. Is there a universal instrument for measuring interactive information retrieval?: the case of the user engagement scale. In Proceedings of Information Interaction in Context, 335. https://doi.org/10.1145/1840784.1840835
[41]
Heather L. O'Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2010. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 1: 50--69. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21229
[42]
Heather Lynn O'Brien. 2010. The influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on user engagement: The case of online shopping experiences. Interacting with Computers 22, 5: 344--352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.001
[43]
Gary M. Olson and Judith S. Olson. 2000. Distance Matters. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 15, 2: 139--178. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4
[44]
Lukasz Piwek and Adam Joinson. 2016. "What do they snapchat about"? Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior 54: 358--367.
[45]
Stuart Reeves, Steve Benford, Claire O'Malley, and Mike Fraser. 2005. Designing the Spectator Experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05), 741--750. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055074
[46]
Stuart Reeves, Christian Greiffenhagen, Martin Flintham, Steve Benford, Matt Adams, Ju Row Farr, and Nicholas Tandavantij. 2015. I'D Hide You: Performing Live Broadcasting in Public. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2573--2582. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702257
[47]
Franziska Roesner, Brian T. Gill, and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2014. Sex, Lies, or Kittens? Investigating the Use of Snapchat's Self-Destructing Messages. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Nicolas Christin and Reihaneh Safavi-Naini (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 64--76. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978--3--662- 45472--5_5
[48]
Adam Rugg and Benjamin Burroughs. 2015. Periscope, Live-Streaming and Mobile Video Culture. In Geoblocking and Global Video Culture. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam.
[49]
Marco Sá, David Shamma, and Elizabeth Churchill. 2014. Live mobile collaboration for video production: design, guidelines, and requirements. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing 18, 3: 693--707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0700-0
[50]
Guy Schofield, Tom Bartindale, and Peter Wright. 2015. Bootlegger: Turning Fans into Film Crew. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 767-- 776. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702229
[51]
David A. Shamma, Elizabeth F. Churchill, Nikhil Bobb, and Matt Fukuda. 2009. Spinning Online: A Case Study of Internet Broadcasting by DJs. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '09), 175--184. https://doi.org/10.1145/1556460.1556486
[52]
David A. Shamma, Lyndon Kennedy, and Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2009. Tweet the Debates: Understanding Community Annotation of Uncollected Sources. In Proceedings of the First SIGMM Workshop on Social Media (WSM '09), 3--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1631144.1631148
[53]
Catherine E. Shoichet. 2016. Facebook Live video offers new perspective on police shootings. CNN. http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/07/us/facebook-live- video-minnesota-police-shooting/index.html
[54]
Matti Siekkinen, Enrico Masala, and Teemu Kämäräinen. 2016. A First Look at Quality of Mobile Live Streaming Experience: the Case of Periscope. In Proceedings of Internet Measurement Conference. http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04270
[55]
John C. Tang, Gina Venolia, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2016. Meerkat and Periscope: I Stream, You Stream, Apps Stream for Live Streams. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 4770--4780. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858374
[56]
Sonja Utz, Nicole Muscanell, and Cameran Khalid. 2015. Snapchat Elicits More Jealousy than Facebook: A Comparison of Snapchat and Facebook Use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18, 3: 141--146. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0479
[57]
J. Mitchell Vaterlaus, Kathryn Barnett, Cesia Roche, and Jimmy A. Young. 2016. "Snapchat is more personal": An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships. Computers in Human Behavior 62: 594--601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.029
[58]
Jon M. Wargo. 2015. Spatial Stories with Nomadic Narrators: Affect, Snapchat, and Feeling Embodiment in Youth Mobile Composing. Journal of Language & Literacy Education 11, 1. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061110.pdf
[59]
Andrew M. Webb, Chen Wang, Andruid Kerne, and Pablo Cesar. 2016. Distributed Liveness: Understanding How New Technologies Transform Performance Experiences. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 432--437. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819974
[60]
Eric N. Wiebe, Allison Lamb, Megan Hardy, and David Sharek. 2014. Measuring engagement in video game- based environments: Investigation of the User Engagement Scale. Computers in Human Behavior 32: 123--132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.001
[61]
Nicky Woolf. 2016. Democrats stream gun control sit-in on Periscope after Republicans turn TV cameras off | US news | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jun/22/d emocrats-sit-in-periscope-facebook-live-gun-control
[62]
Bin Xu, Pamara Chang, Christopher L. Welker, Natalya N. Bazarova, and Dan Cosley. 2016. Automatic Archiving Versus Default Deletion: What Snapchat Tells Us About Ephemerality in Design. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 1662--1675. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819948

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Livestreaming Science: How Awe-Inspiring Media Events May Foster Science Interest Through Meta-Emotional Gratification and Eudaimonic AppreciationScience Communication10.1177/10755470251315951Online publication date: 8-Feb-2025
  • (2024)The Influence of Interactivity in E-commerce Live Streaming on Consumers' Online Purchase IntentionFrontiers in Business, Economics and Management10.54097/mzekmr0216:2(34-37)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Get Ready to Buy With Me: The Effect of Social Presence Interaction and Social Commerce Intention on S-commerce Live StreamingSage Open10.1177/2158244024123275114:1Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. What Makes Live Events Engaging on Facebook Live, Periscope, and Snapchat

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2017
    7138 pages
    ISBN:9781450346559
    DOI:10.1145/3025453
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. events
    2. facebook live
    3. live streams
    4. periscope
    5. snapchat
    6. social media
    7. user engagement
    8. video

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '17
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 600 of 2,400 submissions, 25%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)256
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Livestreaming Science: How Awe-Inspiring Media Events May Foster Science Interest Through Meta-Emotional Gratification and Eudaimonic AppreciationScience Communication10.1177/10755470251315951Online publication date: 8-Feb-2025
    • (2024)The Influence of Interactivity in E-commerce Live Streaming on Consumers' Online Purchase IntentionFrontiers in Business, Economics and Management10.54097/mzekmr0216:2(34-37)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Get Ready to Buy With Me: The Effect of Social Presence Interaction and Social Commerce Intention on S-commerce Live StreamingSage Open10.1177/2158244024123275114:1Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Be there or share: Emplacement and embodied protest in Facebook Live videosNew Media & Society10.1177/14614448241278709Online publication date: 17-Sep-2024
    • (2024)"Like I was There:" A User Evaluation of an Interpersonal Telepresence System Developed through Value Sensitive DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870158:CSCW2(1-18)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Modeling Health Video Consumption Behaviors on Social Media: Activities, Challenges, and CharacteristicsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36536998:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Investigating VTubing as a Reconstruction of Streamer Self-Presentation: Identity, Performance, and GenderProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373578:CSCW1(1-22)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)"I Felt Everyone Was a Streamer": An Empirical Study on What Makes Avatar Collective Streaming EngagingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373448:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)CrossFit Games: A Case Study of Consumer Engagement on Social Live-Streaming Service PlatformsInternational Journal of Sport Communication10.1123/ijsc.2024-010217:4(461-475)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Factors Affecting the Intention to Buy Customers in Live Streaming Shopping2024 28th International Conference on Information Technology (IT)10.1109/IT61232.2024.10475762(1-5)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media