skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025723acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ambiotherm: Enhancing Sense of Presence in Virtual Reality by Simulating Real-World Environmental Conditions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present and evaluate Ambiotherm, a wearable accessory for Head Mounted Displays (HMD) that provides thermal and wind stimuli to simulate real-world environmental conditions, such as ambient temperatures and wind conditions, to enhance the sense of presence in Virtual Reality (VR). Ambiotherm consists of a Ambient Temperature Module that is attached to the user's neck, a Wind Simulation Module focused towards the user's face, and a Control Module utilizing Bluetooth communication. We demonstrate Ambiotherm with two VR environments, a hot desert, and a snowy mountain, to showcase the different types of simulated environmental conditions. We conduct several studies to 1) address design factors of the system and 2) evaluate Ambiotherm's effect on factors related to a user's sense of presence. Our findings show that the addition of wind and thermal stimuli significantly improves sensory and realism factors, contributing towards an enhanced sense of presence when compared to traditional VR experiences.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn2355.mp4

mp4

51.8 MB

pn2355p.mp4

mp4

3.4 MB

References

  1. Duzgun Agdas, Gregory D Webster, and Forrest J Masters. 2012. Wind speed perception and risk. PloS one 7, 11 (2012), e49944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Khandaker Shabbir Ahmed. 2003. Comfort in urban spaces: defining the boundaries of outdoor thermal comfort for the tropical urban environments. Energy and Buildings 35, 1 (2003), 103--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Henrique Andrade, Maria-João Alcoforado, and Sandra Oliveira. 2011. Perception of temperature and wind by users of public outdoor spaces: relationships with weather parameters and personal characteristics. International journal of biometeorology 55, 5 (2011), 665--680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Edward Arens, Hui Zhang, and Charlie Huizenga. 2006. Partial-and whole-body thermal sensation and comfort-Part I: Uniform environmental conditions. Journal of thermal Biology 31, 1 (2006), 53--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bettina A Babbitt and Charles O Nystrom. 1989. Questionnaire construction manual. Technical Report. DTIC Document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sylvain Cardin, Daniel Thalmann, and Frederic Vexo. 2007. Head mounted wind. In proceeding of the 20th annual conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents (CASA2007). 101--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ian Darian-Smith and Kenneth O Johnson. 1977. Thermal sensibility and thermoreceptors. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 69, 1 (1977), 146--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Leonidas Deligiannidis and Robert JK Jacob. 2006. The vr scooter: Wind and tactile feedback improve user performance. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI'06). IEEE, 143--150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Huong Q Dinh, Neff Walker, Larry F Hodges, Chang Song, and Akira Kobayashi. 1999. Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. In Virtual Reality, 1999. Proceedings., IEEE. IEEE, 222--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. José Dionisio. 1997. Virtual hell: A trip through the fiames. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 17, 3 (1997), 11--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gary Fontaine. 1992. The experience of a sense of presence in intercultural and international encounters. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1, 4 (1992), 482--490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chauncey Frend and Michael Boyles. 2015. Programmable immersive peripheral environmental system (PIPES): a prototype control system for environmental feedback devices. In SPIE/IS&T Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 939209--939209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D Gooch. 2009. An Investigation into Communicating Social Presence With Thermal Devices. Ph.D. Dissertation. MSc Dissertation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Barry G Green and Barbara Gelhard. 1987. Perception of temperature on oral and facial skin. Somatosensory research 4, 3 (1987), 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. HT Hammel, DC Jackson, JAJ Stolwijk, JD Hardy, and SB Stromme. 1963. Temperature regulation by hypothalamic proportional control with an adjustable set point. Journal of Applied Physiology 18, 6 (1963), 1146--1154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. David Hannah, Martin Halvey, Graham Wilson, and Stephen A Brewster. 2011. Using multimodal interactions for 3D television and multimedia browsing. In Proceddings of the 9th international interactive conference on Interactive television. ACM, 181--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Richard M Held and Nathaniel I Durlach. 1992. Telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1, 1 (1992), 109--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Felix Hülsmann, Julia Fröhlich, Nikita Mattar, and Ipke Wachsmuth. 2014. Wind and warmth in virtual reality: implementation and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Virtual Reality International Conference. ACM, 24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. JCR Hunt, EC Poulton, and JC Mumford. 1976. The effects of wind on people; new criteria based on wind tunnel experiments. Building and Environment 11, 1 (1976), 15--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ken Iwasaki, Takashi Miyaki, and Jun Rekimoto. 2010. AffectPhone: A Handset Device to Present User's Emotional State with Warmth/Coolness. In B-Interface. 83--88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Claus Jessen. 2012. Temperature regulation in humans and other mammals. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynette A Jones and Michal Berris. 2002. The psychophysics of temperature perception and thermal-interface design. In Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2002. HAPTICS 2002. Proceedings. 10th Symposium on. IEEE, 137--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Igor Knez and Sofia Thorsson. 2006. Influences of culture and environmental attitude on thermal, emotional and perceptual evaluations of a public square. International journal of biometeorology 50, 5 (2006), 258--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Wonjun Lee and Youn-kyung Lim. 2010. Thermo-message: exploring the potential of heat as a modality of peripheral expression. In CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4231--4236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Michael W McGreevy. 1992. The presence of field geologists in Mars-like terrain. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1, 4 (1992), 375--403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. W. H. Melbourne. 1978. Criteria for environmental wind conditions. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 3, 2--3 (1978), 241--249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mitsuru Minakuchi and Satoshi Nakamura. 2007. Collaborative ambient systems by blow displays. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. ACM, 105--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Taeyong Moon and Gerard J Kim. 2004. Design and evaluation of a wind display for virtual reality. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology. ACM, 122--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Heilig Morton. 1962. Sensorama simulator. (Aug. 28 1962). US Patent 3,050,870.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayumi Nakamura, Tamae Yoda, Larry I Crawshaw, Momoko Kasuga, Yuki Uchida, Ken Tokizawa, Kei Nagashima, and Kazuyuki Kanosue. 2013. Relative importance of different surface regions for thermal comfort in humans. European journal of applied physiology 113, 1 (2013), 63--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Mutsuhiro Nakashige, Minoru Kobayashi, Yuriko Suzuki, Hidekazu Tamaki, and Suguru Higashino. 2009. Hiya-Atsu media: augmenting digital media with temperature. In CHI'09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3181--3186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Joost P Pluijms, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland, Wouter M Bergmann Tiest, Fabian A Mulder, and Geert JP Savelsbergh. 2015. Expertise effects in cutaneous wind perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77, 6 (2015), 2121--2133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Katri Salminen, Veikko Surakka, Jukka Raisamo, Jani Lylykangas, Johannes Pystynen, Roope Raisamo, Kalle Mäkelä, and Teemu Ahmaniemi. 2011. Emotional responses to thermal stimuli. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces. ACM, 193--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Thomas B Sheridan. 1992. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1, 1 (1992), 120--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Sunghyun Song, Geeyoung Noh, Junwoo Yoo, Ian Oakley, Jundong Cho, and Andrea Bianchi. 2015. Hot & tight: exploring thermo and squeeze cues recognition on wrist wearables. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 39--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Theodore Stathopoulos, Hanqing Wu, and John Zacharias. 2004. Outdoor human comfort in an urban climate. Building and Environment 39, 3 (2004), 297--305. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Jonathan Steuer. 1992. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication 42, 4 (1992), 73--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Jouke C Verlinden, Fabian A Mulder, Joris S Vergeest, Anna de Jonge, Darina Krutiy, Zsuzsa Nagy, Bob J Logeman, and Paul Schouten. 2013. Enhancement of presence in a virtual sailing environment through localized wind simulation. Procedia Engineering 60 (2013), 435--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Graham Wilson, Martin Halvey, Stephen A Brewster, and Stephen A Hughes. 2011. Some like it hot: thermal feedback for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2555--2564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Bob G Witmer and Michael J Singer. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments 7, 3 (1998), 225--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ambiotherm: Enhancing Sense of Presence in Virtual Reality by Simulating Real-World Environmental Conditions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader