skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025741acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

WAVES: A Wearable Asymmetric Vibration Excitation System for Presenting Three-Dimensional Translation and Rotation Cues

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

WAVES, a Wearable Asymmetric Vibration Excitation System, is a novel wearable haptic device for presenting three dimensions of translation and rotation guidance cues. In contrast to traditional vibration feedback, which usually requires that users learn to interpret a binary cue, asymmetric vibrations have been shown to induce a pulling sensation in a desired direction. When attached to the fingers, a single voicecoil actuator presents a translation guidance cue and a pair of voicecoil actuators presents a rotation guidance cue. The directionality of mechanoreceptors in the skin led to our choice of the location and orientation of the actuators in order to elicit very strong sensations in certain directions. For example, users distinguished a "left" cue versus a "right" cue 94.5% of the time. When presented with one of six possible direction cues, users on average correctly identified the direction of translation cues 86.1% of the time and rotation cues 69.0% of the time.

References

  1. Tomohiro Amemiya, Hideyuki Ando, and Taro Maeda. 2005a. Phantom-DRAWN: direction guidance using rapid and asymmetric acceleration weighted by nonlinearity of perception. In Proc. ACM International Conference on Augmented Tele-Existence. 201--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tomohiro Amemiya, Hideyuki Ando, and Taro Maeda. 2005b. Virtual force display: Direction guidance using asymmetric acceleration via periodic translational motion. In Proc. IEEE World Haptics Conference. 619--622. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Tomohiro Amemiya and Hiroaki Gomi. 2014. Distinct pseudo-attraction force sensation by a thumb-sized vibrator that oscillates asymmetrically. In Haptics: Neuroscience, Devices, Modeling, and Applications. Springer, 88--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tomohiro Amemiya and Hiroaki Gomi. 2016. Active Manual Movement Improves Directional Perception of Illusory Force. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 9 (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Karlin Bark, Emily Hyman, Frank Tan, Elizabeth Cha, Steven A Jax, Laurel J Buxbaum, and Katherine J Kuchenbecker. 2015. Effects of vibrotactile feedback on human learning of arm motions. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 23, 1 (2015), 51--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jonathan Bell, Stanley Bolanowski, and Mark H. Holmes. 1994. The structure and function of Pacinian corpuscles: A review. Progress in Neurobiology 42, 1 (1994), 79--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. James Biggs and Mandayam Srinivasan. 2002. Tangential versus normal displacements of skin: Relative effectiveness for producing tactile sensations. In Proc. IEEE Haptics Symposium. 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ingvars Birznieks, Per Jenmalm, Antony W Goodwin, and Roland S Johansson. 2001. Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents. The Journal of Neuroscience 21, 20 (2001), 8222--8237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Stanley J Bolanowski, George A Gescheider, and Ronald T Verrillo. 1994. Hairy skin: psychophysical channels and their physiological substrates. Somatosensory & motor research 11, 3 (1994), 279--290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Roger W Cholewiak, Amy A Collins, and J Christopher Brill. 2001. Spatial factors in vibrotactile pattern perception. In Proc. Eurohaptics Conference. 41--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. David Collett. 2002. Modeling binary data (2 ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, Chapter 8, 269--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter Compton Collins. 1970. Tactile television-mechanical and electrical image projection. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems 11, 1 (1970), 65--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Heather Culbertson, Julie M Walker, and Allison M Okamura. 2016. Modeling and design of asymmetric vibrations to induce ungrounded pulling sensation through asymmetric skin displacement. In Proc. IEEE Haptics Symposium. 27--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sevgi Ertan, Clare Lee, Abigail Willets, Hong Tan, and Alex Pentland. 1998. A wearable haptic navigation guidance system. In Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 164--165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Brian T Gleeson, Scott K Horschel, and William R Provancher. 2010. Perception of direction for applied tangential skin displacement: Effects of speed, displacement, and repetition. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 3, 3 (2010), 177--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ashley L Guinan, Nicholas C Hornbaker, Markus N Montandon, Andrew J Doxon, and William R Provancher. 2013. Back-to-back skin stretch feedback for communicating five degree-of-freedom direction cues. In Proc. IEEE World Haptics Conference. 13--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. JF Hahn. 1966. Vibrotactile adaptation and recovery measured by two methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology 71, 5 (1966), 655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Liang He, Cheng Xu, Ding Xu, and Ryan Brill. 2015. PneuHaptic: delivering haptic cues with a pneumatic armband. In Proc. ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 47--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Akihiro Imaizumi, Shogo Okamoto, and Yoji Yamada. 2014. Friction sensation produced by laterally asymmetric vibrotactile stimulus. In Haptics: Neuroscience, Devices, Modeling, and Applications. Springer, 11--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ali Israr, Seungmoon Choi, and Hong Z Tan. 2006. Detection threshold and mechanical impedance of the hand in a pen-hold posture. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 472--477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Roland S Johansson and Å B Vallbo. 1979. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. The Journal of Physiology 286, 1 (1979), 283--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kenneth O Johnson. 2001. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11, 4 (2001), 455--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Anita Meier, Denys JC Matthies, Bodo Urban, and Reto Wettach. 2015. Exploring vibrotactile feedback on the body and foot for the purpose of pedestrian navigation. In Proc. International Workshop on Sensor-Based Activity Recognition and Interaction. ACM, 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Takuto Nakamura, Narihiro Nishimura, Michi Sato, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2014. Application of hanger reflex to wrist and waist. In Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality. 181--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jun Rekimoto. 2014. Traxion: a tactile interaction device with virtual force sensation. In ACM SIGGRAPH Emerging Technologies. 25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Simon Robinson, Matt Jones, Parisa Eslambolchilar, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Mads Lindborg. 2010. I did it my way: moving away from the tyranny of turn-by-turn pedestrian navigation. In Proc. International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 341--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Carlos Rossa, Jason Fong, Nawaid Usmani, Ronald Sloboda, and Mahdi Tavakoli. 2016. Multiactuator haptic feedback on the wrist for needle steering guidance in brachytherapy. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 1, 2 (2016), 852--859.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sonja Rümelin, Enrico Rukzio, and Robert Hardy. 2011. NaviRadar: a novel tactile information display for pedestrian navigation. In Proc. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 293--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Samuel B Schorr, Zhan Fan Quek, William R Provancher, and Allison M Okamura. 2015. Environment Perception in the Presence of Kinesthetic or Tactile Guidance Virtual Fixtures. In Proc. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 287--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Takuya Shima and Kenjiro Takemura. 2012. An ungrounded pulling force feedback device using periodical vibration-impact. In Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication. Springer, 481--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Roland Sigrist, Georg Rauter, Robert Riener, and Peter Wolf. 2013. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20, 1 (2013), 21--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Adam J Spiers and Aaron M Dollar. 2016. Outdoor pedestrian navigation assistance with a shape-changing haptic interface and comparison with a vibrotactile device. In Proc. IEEE Haptics Symposium. 34--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Takeshi Tanabe, Hiroaki Yano, and Hiroo Iwata. 2016. Properties of proprioceptive sensation with a vibration speaker-type non-grounded haptic interface. In Proc. IEEE Haptics Symposium. 21--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Hanns W Tappeiner, Roberta L Klatzky, Bert Unger, and Ralph Hollis. 2009. Good vibrations: Asymmetric vibrations for directional haptic cues. In Proc. IEEE World Haptics Conference. 285--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Beverly von Haller Gilmer. 1935. The measurement of the sensitivity of the skin to mechanical vibration. The Journal of General Psychology 13, 1 (1935), 42--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Bernhard Weber, Simon Schätzle, Thomas Hulin, Carsten Preusche, and Barbara Deml. 2011. Evaluation of a vibrotactile feedback device for spatial guidance. In Proc. IEEE World Haptics Conference. 349--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. WAVES: A Wearable Asymmetric Vibration Excitation System for Presenting Three-Dimensional Translation and Rotation Cues

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader