skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025761acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

It wasn't really about the Pokémon: Parents' Perspectives on a Location-Based Mobile Game

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Though prior work shows parents worry about screen media experiences displacing physical activity and time outdoors, this research does not account for location-based mobile games like Pokémon GO, which specifically facilitate outdoor activity. To fill this gap in the research, we surveyed and interviewed parents to understand (1) their values and perceptions of this type of gameplay and (2) how they co-play Pokémon GO with their children. Our findings provide empirical evidence that, in addition to appreciating the increased exercise and time outdoors, parents valued how play led to family bonding experiences. Furthermore, some traditional concerns about screen time persisted in this context, and new concerns about safety in real-world environments emerged. Parents mitigated these concerns with rules and gameplay choices, such as maintaining control of the mobile device, to ensure children were safe. This work contributes an empirical understanding of families as co-users of technology and offers a generative lens to study and design for joint media engagement among family members where gameplay differs from normative notions of screen time.

References

  1. Pål André Aarsand. 2007. Computer and Video Games in Family Life: The digital divide as a resource in intergenerational interactions. Childhood 14, 2 (May 2007), 235--256. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0907568207078330 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Rafael Ballagas, Thérèse E. Dugan, Glenda Revelle, Koichi Mori, Maria Sandberg, Janet Go, Emily Reardon, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2013. Electric agents: fostering sibling joint media engagement through interactive television and augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 225--236. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441803 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Shari Barkin, Edward Ip, Irma Richardson, Sara Klinepeter, Stacia Finch, and Marina Krcmar. 2006. Parental media mediation styles for children aged 2 to 11 years. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 160, 4 (April 2006), 395--401. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.4.395 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brigid Barron, Caitlin Kennedy Martin, Lori Takeuchi, and Rachel Fithian. 2009. Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media 1, 2 (May 2009), 55--77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ijlm.2009.0021 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mindy Brooks, Ashley Fenwick-Naditch, and Erica Branch-Ridley. 2011. Electric Racer: An intergenerational gaming experience designed to promote literacy. In The New Coviewing: Designing for Learning through Joint Media, 30--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ari Brown, Donald L. Shifrin, and David L. Hill. 2015. Beyond 'turn it off': How to advise families on media use. AAP News 36, 10 (October 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Adrian David Cheok, Kok Hwee Goh, Wei Liu, Farzam Farbiz, Siew Wan Fong, Sze Lee Teo, Yu Li, and Xubo Yang. 2004. Human Pacman: A mobile, widearea entertainment system based on physical, social, and ubiquitous computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8, 2 (May 2004), 71--81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004-0267-x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Luca Chittaro and Riccardo Sioni. 2012. Turning the classic snake mobile game into a location-based exergame that encourages walking. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 43--54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/9783-642-31037-9_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dimitri A. Christakis. 2010. Internet addiction: A 21st century epidemic? BMC Medicine 8, 1 (2010). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-61 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lynn Schofield Clark. 2011. Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory 21, 4 (October 2011): 323--343. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research (4th ed.) SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Entertainment Software Association. 2015. Essential Facts about the Computer and Video Game Industry. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http://www.theesa.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/04/ESA-Essential-Facts2015.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Federal Trade Commission. Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule ("COPPA"). Retrieved on September 16, 2016 from https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rules/rulemaking-regulatory-reform-proceedings/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sean Follmer, Hayes Raffle, Janet Go, Rafael Ballagas, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2010. Video play: playful interactions in video conferencing for long-distance families with young children. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1810543.1810550 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Michelle M. Garrison, Kimberly Liekweg, and Dimitri A. Christakis. 2011. Media use and child sleep: The impact of content, timing, and environment. Pediatrics 128, 1 (June 2011), 29--35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3304 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Douglas A. Gentile, Amy I. Nathanson, Eric E. Rasmussen, Rachel A. Reimer, and David A. Walsh. 2012. Do you see what I see Parent and child reports of parental monitoring of media. Family Relations 61, 3 (June 2012): 470--487. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00709.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Janet Go, Rafael Ballagas, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2012. Brothers and sisters at play: exploring game play with siblings. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 739--748. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145316 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mark Hachman. 2016. Pokémon Go is coming to Apple Watch to get you outside and on the go. Macworld. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http://www.macworld.com/article/3117338/iosapps/pokmon-go-is-coming-to-apple-watch-to-get-you-outside-and-on-the-go.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Megan K. Halpern, Max Evjen, Dan Cosley, Michael Lin, Stephen Tseou, Erica Horowitz, Tejaswi Peesapati, and Geri Gay. 2011. SunDial: embodied informal science education using GPS. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 27, 50 (June 2011), 48--65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v27i50.3341 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Alexis Hiniker, Kiley Sobel, Hyewon Suh, Yi-Chen Sung, Charlotte P. Lee, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. Texting while Parenting: How Adults Use Mobile Phones while Caring for Children at the Playground. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 727--736. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702199 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Alexis Hiniker, Hyewon Suh, Sabina Cao, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Screen Time Tantrums: How Families Manage Screen Media Experiences for Toddlers and Preschoolers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 648--660. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858278 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Tom Hope, Yoshiyuki Nakamura, Toru Takahashi, Atsushi Nobayashi, Shota Fukuoka, Masahiro Hamasaki, and Takuichi Nishimura. 2009. Familial collaborations in a museum. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19631972. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519000 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17--24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/642611.642616 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sara Isola and Jerry Alan Fails. 2012. Family and design in the IDC and CHI communities. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 40--49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307102 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mizuko Ito, Sonja Baumer, Matteo Bittanti, danah boyd, Rachel Cody, Becky Herr, Heather A. Horst, Patricia G. Lange, Dilan Mahendran, Katynka Martinez, C. J. Pascoe, Dan Perkel, Laura Robinson, Christo Sims, and Lisa Tripp. 2010. Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hilda K. Kabali, Matilde M. Irigoyen, Rosemary Nunez-Davis, Jennifer G. Budacki, Sweta H. Mohanty, Kristin P. Leister, Robert L. Bonner Jr. 2015. Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics 136, 6 (November 2015), 10441050. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2151 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jofish Kaye, Matti Nelimarkka, Riitta Kauppinen, Sini Vartiainen, and Pekka Isosomppi. 2011. Mobile family interaction: how to use mobile technology to bring trust, safety and wellbeing into families. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 721--724. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037497 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Konstantinos Kazakos, Elizabeth Bales, Carman Neustaedter, Svetlana Yarosh, Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye, and David Kirk. 2013. Exploring the diversity of families: designing technologies for the contemporary family life. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3255--3258. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479660 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. John Keilman. 2016. 'Pokemon Go' can bring families together. The Chicago Tribune. Retrieved on August 20, 2016 from http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ct-pokemon-go-keilman-column-hf-0720--20160714-column.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Brian Koerber. 2016. 'Pokémon GO' is actually bringing families together. Mashable. Retrieved on August 20, 2016 from http://mashable.com/2016/07/11/pokemon-go-family-bonding-dad/#sDU4uQJMIZqz.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kevin M. Leander, Nathan C. Phillips, and Katherine Headrick Taylor. 2010. The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of research in Education 34, 1 (March 2010), 329--394. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732x09358129 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Jin Ha Lee, Rachel Ivy Clarke, and Yea-Seul Kim. 2015. Video game information needs and game organization: differences by sex and age. Information Research 20, 3 (September 2015), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Amanda Lenhart. 2015. A Majority of American Teens Report Access to a Computer, Game Console, Smartphone and a Tablet. Pew Research Center. Retrieved September 6, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/a-majority-of-american-teens-report-access-to-a-computer-game-console-smartphone-and-a-tablet/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sonia Livingstone and Ellen J. Helsper. 2008. Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52, 4 (November 2008): 581--599. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Kate Lund, Paul Coulton, and Andrew Wilson. 2011. Free All Monsters! a context-aware location based game. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 675--678. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037482 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Leilah Lyons, David Becker, and Jessica Roberts. 2010. Analyzing the affordances of mobile technologies for informal science learning. Museums & Social Issues 5, 1 (April 2010), 87--102. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/msi.2010.5.1.87 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Frank N. Magid Associates, Inc. 2015. Family Gaming Study. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http://v.magid.com/video/mmf/Magid_Family_Gaming_Study_October_2015.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Joe Marshall and Paul Tennent. 2013. Mobile interaction does not exist. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2069--2078. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468725 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Carman Neustaedter, Tejinder K. Judge, Steve Harrison, Abigail Sellen, Xiang Cao, David Kirk, and Joseph Kaye. 2010. Connecting families: new technologies, family communication, and the impact on domestic space. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 363--366. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1880071.1880152 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Carman Neustaedter, Anthony Tang, and Tejinder K. Judge. 2013. Creating scalable location-based games: lessons from Geocaching. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 2 (February 2013), 335--349. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0497-7 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Niantic, Inc. 2016. Heads up! Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://pokemongo.nianticlabs.com/en/post/headsup/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Niantic, Inc. 2016. Pokémon GO Plus. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://www.pokemongo.com/en-us/pokemon-go-plus/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Niantic, Inc. 2016. Pokémon GO Support. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from https://support.pokemongo.nianticlabs.com/hc/en-us.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Niantic, Inc. 2016. Pokémon GO Safety FAQs. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from https://support.pokemongo.nianticlabs.com/hc/enus/articles/226389207-Safety-FAQs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Peter Nikken and Jeroen Jansz. 2006. Parental mediation of children's videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, media and technology 31, 2 (June 2006): 181--202. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439880600756803 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Peter Nikken and Jeroen Jansz. 2013. Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children's internet use. Learning, Media and Technology 39, 2 (March 2013), 250--266. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Peter Nikken, Jeroen Jansz, and Sanneke Schouwstra. 2007. Parents' interest in videogame ratings and content descriptors in relation to game mediation. European Journal of Communication 22, 3 (September 2007), 315--336. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323107079684 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Peter Nikken and Marjon Schols. 2015. How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of child and family studies 24, 11 (February 2015), 3423--3435. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10826015-0144-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Mary Emily O'Hara. 2016. Meet the Pokémoms: Obsession with playing Pokémon Go has brought families closer together. Retrieved August 20, 2016 from http://www.salon.com/2016/08/14/meet-the-pokemoms-ob_partner/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Pew Research Center. Device Ownership Over Time. Retrieved September 6, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/mobile/device-ownership/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Andy Robertson. 2016. The best way to enjoy Pokemon Go? Keep it in the family. The Telegraph. Retrieved August 20, 2016 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/gaming/what-to-play/the-best-way-to-enjoy-pokemon-go-keep-it-in-the-family/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Barbara Rogoff. 1990. Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Herman Saksono, Ashwini Ranade, Geeta Kamarthi, Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa, Jessica A. Hoffman, Cathy Wirth, and Andrea G. Parker. 2015. Spaceship Launch: Designing a collaborative exergame for families. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1776--1787. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675159 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Alexandra Samuel. 2015. Parents: Reject Technology Shame. The Atlantic. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/1 1/why-parents-shouldnt-feel-technology-shame/414163/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Alexandra Samuel. 2015. What kind of digital parent are you? @AlexandraSamuel. Retrieved on September 15, 2016 from http://alexandrasamuel.com/parenting/what-kind-of-digital-parent-are-you.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Jeremy Sarachan. 2011. Limiting Screen Time Is Not the Key to Parenting in the Digital Age. International Journal of Learning and Media 3, 4 (September 2011), 1--5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ijlm_a_00082 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Kelly L. Schmitt. 2000. Public policy, family rules and children's media use in the home. Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Donald Shifrin, Ari Brown, David Hill, Laura Jana, and Susan K. Flinn. 2015. Growing up digital: Media research symposium. American Academy of Pediatrics (October 2015), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Aric Sigman. 2012. Time for a view on screen time. Archives of disease in childhood 97, 11 (October 2012), 935--942. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2012-302196 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Aaron Smith. 2015. U.S. Smartphone Use in 2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved September 6, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Nathalie Sonck, Peter Nikken, and Jos de Haan. 2013. Determinants of internet mediation: A comparison of the reports by Dutch parents and children. Journal of Children and Media 7, 1 (February 2013), 96--113. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.739806 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Kevin G. Stanley, Ian Livingston, Alan Bandurka, Robert Kapiszka, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2010. PiNiZoRo: a GPS-based exercise game for families. In Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology (Futureplay '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 243--246. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1920778.1920817 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Reed Stevens and William R. Penuel. 2010. Studying and fostering learning through joint media engagement. In Principal Investigators Meeting of the National Science Foundation's Science of Learning Centers, 1--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Reed Stevens, T. Satwicz, and L. McCarthy, L. 2008. In-game, in-room, in-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids' lives. The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning, 41--66. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Victor C. Strasburger. 2010. Media education. Pediatrics 126, 5 (September 2010), 1012--1017. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1636 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Victor C. Strasburger, Barbara J. Wilson, and Amy B. Jordan. 2009. Children, adolescents, and the media. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Lori Takeuchi. 2011. Families Matter: Designing Media for a Digital Age. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Lori Takeuchi and Reed Stevens. 2011. The New Coviewing: Designing for Learning through Joint Media Engagement. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Katie Headrick Taylor and Rogers Hall. 2013. Countermapping the neighborhood on bicycles: Mobilizing youth to reimagine the city. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 18, 1-2 (April 2013), 65--93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10758-013-9201-5 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Michael Tscholl and Robb Lindgren. 2016. Designing for learning conversations: How parents support children's science Learning within an immersive simulation. Science Education 100, 5 (April 2016), 877--902. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.21228 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Sherry Turkle. 2011. Life on the Screen. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Patti M. Valkenburg, Marina Krcmar, Allerd L. Peeters, and Nies M. Marseille. 1999. Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: "Instructive mediation," "restrictive mediation," and "social coviewing." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43, 1 (January 1999): 52--66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364474 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Amy Voida and Saul Greenberg. 2009. Wii all play: the console game as a computational meeting place. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1559--1568. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518940 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Lev S. Vygotsky. 1980. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Lev S. Vygotsky. 1987. Thinking and speech. In L. S. Vygotsky, R. W. Rieber (Series Eds.), and A. S. Carton (Vol. Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1: Problems in general psychology (N. Minick, Trans.). New York: Plenum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Ellen A. Wartella and Nancy Jennings. 2000. Children and computers: New technology. Old concerns. The future of children 10, 2 (2000), 31--43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1602688 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Barbara J. Wilson. 2008. Media and children's aggression, fear, and altruism. Future of Children 18, 1 (2008), 87--118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Frederick J. Zimmerman and Dimitri A. Christakis. 2007. Associations between content types of early media exposure and subsequent attentional problems. Pediatrics 120, 5 (November 2007), 986--992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3322 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. It wasn't really about the Pokémon: Parents' Perspectives on a Location-Based Mobile Game

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader