skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025837acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Design Perspective on Data

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Empirical studies invariably show that data generation is situationally contingent and interpretively flexible, even when data is collected automatically. This essay situates data generation within a design perspective, demonstrating how data creation can be understood as a multilayered set of interlocking design activities. By showing how data is infused with design, this paper argues that any "use" of data represents a continuation of its design. We are always designers of data, never its mere appropriators.

References

  1. A. Telier. (Thomas Binder, Giorgio De Michelis, Pelle Ehn, Giulio Jacucci, Per Linde and Ina Wagner.) 2011. Design Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kirsten Boehner and Carl DiSalvo. 2016. Data, Design and civics: an exploratory study of civic tech. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16)., 2970--2981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858326 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Geoffrey Bowker. 2000. Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science 30, 5: 643--683. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Allyson Carlyle. 2015. The policeman's beard was what? Representation and reality in knowledge organization and description. Proceedings of the iConference 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/73642Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Andy Crabtree and Richard Mortier. 2015. Human data interaction: historical lessons from social studies and CSCW In: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chris Elsden, Bettina Nissen, Andrew Garbett, David Chatting, David Kirk, and John Vines. 2016. Metadating: exploring the romance and future of personal data. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 685--698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858173 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Melanie Feinberg. 2015. Genres without writers: information systems and distributed authorship. In Genre Theory in Information Studies, edited by J. Andersen. London: Emerald. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Joel E. Fischer, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, James A. Colley, Enrico Costanza, Michael O. Jewell, and Sarvapali D. Ramchurn. 2016. "Just whack it on until it gets hot": working with IoT data in the home. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 5933--5944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858518 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jonathan Furner. 2010. Philosophy and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44: 161--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. William Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), 233--240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/642611.642653 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. William Gaver, Andy Boucher, Nadine Jarvis, David Cameron, Mark Hauenstein, Sarah Pennington, John Bowers, James Pike, Robin Beitra, and Liliana Ovalle. 2016. The Datacatcher: batch deployment and documentation of 130 location-aware, mobile devices that put sociopolitically-relevant big data in people's hands: polyphonic interpretation at scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 1597--1607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858472 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Charles Goodwin. 1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3): 606--633. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jane Greenberg. 2009. Metadata and digital information. In Bates, Marcia, and Mary Niles Maack (eds). Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 3rd ed. CRC Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Steven Houben, Connie Golsteijn, Sarah Gallacher, Rose Johnson, Saskia Bakker, Nicolai Marquardt, Licia Capra, and Yvonne Rogers. 2016. Physikit: data engagement through physical ambient visualizations in the home. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16)., 1608--1619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858059 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA). 1998. Functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR). http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2 008.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Steven J. Jackson and Sarah Barbrow. 2015. Standards and/as innovation: protocols, creativity, and interactive systems development in ecology. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 1769--1778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702564 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Eric Kansa, Sarah Kansa, and Benjamin Arbuckle. 2014. Publishing and pushing: mixing models for communicating research data in archeology. International Journal of Digital Curation 9,1: 57--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Bruno Latour. 1999. Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jin Ha Lee, Hyerim Cho, Violet Fox, and Andrew Perti. 2013. User-centered approach in creating a metadata schema for video games and interactive media. Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), 229--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jin Ha Lee, Rachel Clarke, and Andrew Perti. 2015. Empirical evaluation of metadata for video games and interactive media. Journal for the Association of Information Science and Technology (JASIST).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Donald McMillan, Arvid Engström, Airi Lampinen, and Barry Brown. 2016. Data and the city. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 2933--2944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858434 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Johan Redström. 2008. RE: definitions of use. Design Studies 29:4, 410--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '14), 1163--1172. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems (DIS '06), 99--108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142422 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Susan Leigh Star and James Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--1939. Social Studies of Science 19, 3: 387--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Alex S. Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan, David Sweeney, Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Lillie Grainger, and Jessica Lingel. 2015. Data-in-place: thinking through the relations between data and community. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2863--2872. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702558 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Peter Tolmie, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, James Colley, and Ewa Luger. 2016. "This has to be the cats": personal data legibility in networked sensing systems. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 491--502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819992 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Cesar Torres, Jasper O'Leary, and Eric Paulos. 2016. LiveObjects: leveraging theatricality for an expressive Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16 Companion), 5--8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2908805.2908807 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ron Wakkary, Audrey Desjardins, and Sabrina Hauser. 2016. Unselfconscious interaction: a conceptual construct. Interacting With Computers 28, 4: 501--520. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Patrick Wilson. 1968. Two kinds of power: an essay on bibliographic control. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of CA Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Peter Worthy, Ben Matthews, and Stephen Viller. 2016. Trust me: doubts and concerns living with the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16), 427--434. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901890Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Marcia Zeng and Lois Mai Chan. 2009. Semantic interoperability. In Bates, Marcia, and Mary Niles Maack (eds). Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 3rd ed. CRC Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Design Perspective on Data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader