skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025850acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Building with Data: Architectural Models as Inspiration for Data Physicalization

Published: 02 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the role of physical scale models in the architectural design process and apply insights from architecture for the creation and use of data physicalizations. Based on a survey of the architecture literature on model making and ten interviews with practicing architects, we describe the role of physical models as a tool for exploration and communication. From these observations, we identify trends in the use of physical models in architecture, which have the potential to inform the design of data physicalizations. We identify four functions of architectural modeling that can be directly adapted for use in the process of building rich data models. Finally, we discuss how the visualization community can apply observations from architecture to the design of new data physicalizations.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (pn2972-file4.zip)
suppl.mov (pn2972p.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Emily Abruzzo and Eric Ellingsen (eds.). 2008. Models. Princeton Architectural Press.
[2]
Scott Bateman, Regan L Mandryk, Carl Gutwin, Aaron Genest, David Mcdine, and Christopher Brooks. 2010. Useful Junk? The Effects of Visual Embellishment on Comprehension and Memorability of Charts. Human Factors: 2573-- 2582. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753716
[3]
Stuart Card and Jock Mackinlay. 1997. The Structure of the Information Visualization Design Space. Information Visualization, 1997: 92--99. http://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.1997.636792
[4]
Tom Chandler, Maxime Cordeil, Tobias Czauderna, et al. 2015. Immersive Analytics. 2015 Big Data Visual Analytics (BDVA), IEEE, 1--8. http://doi.org/10.1109/BDVA.2015.7314296
[5]
John James. Coulton. 1977. Ancient Greek Architects at Work?: Problems of Structure and Design. Cornell University Press.
[6]
Pierre Dragicevic and Yvonne Jansen. List of Physical Visualizations. Retrieved September 15, 2016 from http://dataphys.org/list/
[7]
Nick Dunn. 2010. Architectural Modelmaking. Laurence King.
[8]
Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation. UIST '13 Proceedings: 417--426. http://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502032
[9]
Marco Frascari, Jonathan Hale, and Bradley Starkey (eds.). 2007. From Models to Drawings: Imagination and representation in architecture. Routledge.
[10]
Nancy Frishberg. 2006. Prototyping with junk. Interactions 13, 1: 21--23. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1109069.11 09086
[11]
Cemre Gungor. Blip: A Year of Travel. 2011. Retrieved September 12, 2016 from http://dataphys.org/list/blip-a-year-of-travel/
[12]
Jeffrey Heer, Jock D Mackinlay, Chris Stolte, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2008. Graphical Histories for Visualization?: Supporting Analysis, Communication, and Evaluation. 14, 6: 1189-- 1196.
[13]
Trevor Hogan and Eva Hornecker. 2012. How Does Representation Modality Affect User-Experience of Data Artifacts? Proceedings of Haptic and Audio Interaction Design 7468: 141--151. http://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--32796--4_15
[14]
Seth Hunter, Pattie Maes, Stacey Scott, and Henry Kaufman. 2011. MemTable?: An Integrated System for Capture and Recall of Shared Histories in Group Workspaces. Social Work: 3305--3314. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979432
[15]
Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale, Alice Thudt, Anthony Tang, and Michael Mauerer. 2014. Constructive visualization. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, ACM Press, 433--442. http://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598566
[16]
Petra Isenberg and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2007. Interactive tree comparison for Co-located collaborative information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6: 1232--1239. http://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70568
[17]
Yvonne Jansen and Pierre Dragicevic. 2013. An interaction model for visualizations beyond the desktop. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12: 2396--2405. http://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.134
[18]
Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2013. Evaluating the efficiency of physical visualizations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 2593. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481359
[19]
Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra Isenberg, et al. 2015. Opportunities and Challenges for Data Physicalization. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 3227--3236. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702180
[20]
Yvonne Jansen and Kasper Hornbaek. 2016. A Psychophysical Investigation of Size as a Physical Variable. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1: 479--488. http://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467951
[21]
Criss Mills. 2000. Designing with Models?: a Studio Guide to Making and Using Architectural Design Models. John Wiley.
[22]
Andrew Vande Moere and Stephanie Patel. 2010. The Physical Visualization of Information: Designing Data Sculptures in an Educational Context. Visual Information Communication, 1: 1--23. http://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4419-0312--9_1
[23]
Andrew Vande Moere, Martin Tomitsch, Christoph Wimmer, Boesch Christoph, and Thomas Grechenig. 2012. Evaluating the effect of style in information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 12: 2739--2748. http://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.221
[24]
Mark Morris. 2006. Models?: Architecture and the Miniature. Wiley-Academy.
[25]
Nicholas Negroponte. 1971. Aspects of Living in an Architecture Machine. Design Research Society Conference Proceedings: 63--67.
[26]
Dietmar Offenhuber and Orkan Telhan. 2015. Indexical visualization-the data-less information display. In Ubiquitous Computing, Complexity and Culture, Jay David Bolter, Lily Diaz, Morten Søndergaard and Maria Engberg (eds.). Routledge, 288--303.
[27]
Ansgar Oswald. 2008. Architectural Models. DOM Publishers.
[28]
Juhani Pallasmaa. 2013. Hapticity and Time. In Encounters 1 - Architectural Essays. Rakennustieto Publishing.
[29]
Ben Piper, Carlo Ratti, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2002. Illuminating Clay?: A Tangible Interface with potential GRASS applications. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 355--362. http://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503439
[30]
Donald A. Schön. 1985. The design studio?: an exploration of its traditions and potentials. RIBA Publications for RIBA Building Industry Trust.
[31]
Milena Stavric, Predrag Sidanin, and Bojan Tepavcevic. 2013. Architectural Scale Models in the Digital Age: Design, Representation and Manufacturing. Springer.
[32]
Simon Stusak, Jeannette Schwarz, and Andreas Butz. 2015. Evaluating the Memorability of Physical Visualizations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 3247--3250. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702248
[33]
Simon Stusak, Aurelien Tabard, Franziska Sauka, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Andreas Butz. 2014. Activity sculptures: Exploring the impact of physical visualizations on running activity. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12: 2201--2210. http://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2352953
[34]
Faisal Taher, John Hardy, Abhijit Karnik, et al. 2015. Exploring Interactions with Physically Dynamic Bar Charts. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 3237--3246. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702604
[35]
Edward Tufte. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press.
[36]
Brygg Ullmer and Hiroshi Ishii. 1997. The metaDESK: models and prototypes for tangible user interfaces. UIST '97 Proceedings: 223--232. http://doi.org/10.1145/263407.263551
[37]
John Underkoffler and Hiroshi Ishii. 1999. Urp: A luminous-tangible workbench for urban planning and design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 386-- 393. http://doi.org/http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/302979.30
[38]
Jagoda Walny, Samuel Huron, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2015. An Exploratory Study of Data Sketching for Visual Representation. Computer Graphics Forum 34, 3: 231--240. http://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12635
[39]
Megan Werner. 2011. Model Making. Princeton Architectural Press.
[40]
Sean White and Steven Feiner. 2009. SiteLens: Situated Visualization Techniques for Urban Site Visits. Proceedings of the 2009 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 1117--1120. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518871
[41]
Wesley Willett, Yvonne Jansen, and Pierre Dragicevic. 2017. Embedded Data Representations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1: 461--470. http://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598608
[42]
William Wright, David Schroh, Pascale Proulx, Alex Skaburskis, and Brian Cort. 2006. The Sandbox for analysis: concepts and methods. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 801--810. http://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124890
[43]
Albena Yaneva. 2005. Scaling Up and Down: Extraction Trials in Architectural Design. Social Studies of Science 35, 6: 867--894. http://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705053053
[44]
Longyu Zhang, Haiwei Dong, and Abdulmotaleb El Saddik. 2016. From 3D Sensing to Printing: A Survey. Acm Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications 12, 2. http://doi.org/10.1145/2818710
[45]
Jack Zhao and Andrew Vande Moere. 2008. Embodiment in data sculpture. DIMEA '08 Proceedings, ACM Press, 343. http://doi.org/10.1145/1413634.1413696
[46]
Amit Zoran and Ja Paradiso. 2013. Freed: a freehand digital sculpting tool. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 2613--2616. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481361

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Spatial Awareness and User Preferences During Group Locomotion in Virtual Reality: A Study with Four-User Groups2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00078(403-409)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
  • (2023)VoxelHap: A Toolkit for Constructing Proxies Providing Tactile and Kinesthetic Haptic Feedback in Virtual RealityProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3586183.3606722(1-13)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Thinking Spatially About Data: A Developing Framework to Understand Children's Spatial Reasoning in Data PhysicalizationProceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3585088.3593891(537-542)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Building with Data: Architectural Models as Inspiration for Data Physicalization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2017
    7138 pages
    ISBN:9781450346559
    DOI:10.1145/3025453
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. architectural models
    2. data physicalization
    3. data visualization
    4. design process
    5. embodied interaction

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '17
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 600 of 2,400 submissions, 25%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)124
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Spatial Awareness and User Preferences During Group Locomotion in Virtual Reality: A Study with Four-User Groups2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00078(403-409)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
    • (2023)VoxelHap: A Toolkit for Constructing Proxies Providing Tactile and Kinesthetic Haptic Feedback in Virtual RealityProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3586183.3606722(1-13)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Thinking Spatially About Data: A Developing Framework to Understand Children's Spatial Reasoning in Data PhysicalizationProceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3585088.3593891(537-542)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
    • (2023)ProxSituated VisualizationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580952(1-20)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)DataVisage: A Card-Based Design Workshop to Support Design Ideation on Data PhysicalizationEntertainment Computing – ICEC 202310.1007/978-981-99-8248-6_45(471-483)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
    • (2022)Live Feedback for Training Through Real-Time Data Visualizations: A Study with League of LegendsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35495066:CHI PLAY(1-23)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Co-gnito: a Participatory Physicalization Game for Urban Mental MappingProceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3527927.3532803(284-297)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Making Data Tangible: A Cross-disciplinary Design Space for Data PhysicalizationProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501939(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Interactive Robotic Plastering: Augmented Interactive Design and Fabrication for On-site Robotic PlasteringProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501842(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Augmented Scale Models: Presenting Multivariate Data Around Physical Scale Models in Augmented Reality2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR55827.2022.00019(54-63)Online publication date: Oct-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media