skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025871acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Pokémon GO Experience: A Location-Based Augmented Reality Mobile Game Goes Mainstream

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Pokémon GO is a location-based augmented reality mobile game based on the Pokémon franchise. After the game was launched globally in July 2016, it quickly became the most successful mobile game in both popularity and revenue generation at the time, and the first location-based augmented reality game to reach a mainstream status. We explore the game experiences through a qualitative survey (n=1000) in Finland focusing on the positive and the negative aspects of Pokémon GO as told by the players. The positive experiences are related to movement, sociability, game mechanics, and brand while the negative experiences emerge from technical problems, unequal gaming opportunities, bad behavior of other players and non-players, and unpolished game design. Interestingly, the augmented reality features, safety issues or the free-to-play revenue model did not receive considerable feedback. The findings are useful for academics and industry practitioners for studying and designing location-based augmented reality game experiences.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn3156p.mp4

mp4

2.2 MB

References

  1. Kati Alha, Elina Koskinen, Janne Paavilainen, Juho Hamari, and Jani Kinnunen. 2014. Free-to-Play Games: Professionals' Perspective. In Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Rafael Ballagas and Steffen P. Walz. 2009. REXplorer. In Pervasive Games: Theory and Design, Markus Montola, Jaakko Stenros, and Annika Waern (eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Keith Bassett. 2004. Walking as an aesthetic practice and a critical tool: Some psychogeographic experiments. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 28, 3: 397--410. doi:10.1080/0309826042000286965. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Marek Bell, Matthew Chalmers, Louise Barkhuus, Malcolm Hall, Scott Sherwood, Paul Tennent, Barry Brown, Duncan Rowland, Steve Benford, Mauricio Capra, and Alastair Hampshire. 2006. Interweaving mobile games with everyday life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI´06), 417--426. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1124772.1124835Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. John-Paul Bichard and Annika Waern. 2008. Pervasive play, immersion and story: Designing interference. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts (DIMEA'08), 10--17. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1413634.1413642Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Martin Bjerver. 2006. Player Behaviour in Pervasive Games -- using the City as Game Board in Botfighters. Master's Thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chris Carter. 2016. Pokémon Go advanced strategies: Turn off AR. Polygon. Retrieved September 21, 2016 from http://www.polygon.com/pokemongo/2016/7/19/12229694/turn-off-arGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Guy Debord. 2012. Theory of the dérive. (Orig. 1958.) Situationist International Anthology. Bureau of Public Secrets, Berkeley, CA, 50--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Christy Dena. 2009. Transmedia Practice: Theorizing the Practice of Expressing a Fictional World across Distinct Media and Environments. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Sydney, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Inger Ekman, Laura Ermi, Jussi Lahti, Jani Nummela, Petri Lankoski, and Frans Mäyrä. 2005. Designing sound for a pervasive mobile game. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (ACE'05),,110--16. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1178477.1178492Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Greg Guest, Kathleen M. MacQueen, and Emily E. Namey. 2012. Applied Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Juho Hamari. 2011. Perspectives from behavioral economics to analyzing game design patterns: Loss aversion in social games. Presentation in Social Games Workshop, CHI'11,,Vancouver, Canada, May 7--12, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nash Jenkins. 2016. Pokémon Go May Have Just Shown Us What the End of the World Looks Like. Time, Retrieved August 22, 2016 from http://time.com/4460911/pokemon-go-taipei-stampedesnorlax-mob-xinbeitou-taiwan/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hannu Korhonen, Hannamari Saarenpää, and Janne Paavilainen. 2008. Pervasive mobile games - a new mindset for players and developers. In Fun and Games: Second International Conference, Panos Markopoulos et al. (eds.). Eindhoven, The Netherlands, October 2021, 2008. Springer: Berlin / Heidelberg, 21--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jussi Kuittinen, Annakaisa Kultima, Johannes Niemelä, and Janne Paavilainen. 2007. Casual games discussion. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play, 105--112. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1328202.1328221Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Annakaisa Kultima. 2009. Casual game design values. In Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era, 5865. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1621841.1621854Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Petri Lankoski, Satu Heliö, Jani Nummela, Jussi Lahti, Frans Mäyrä, and Laura Ermi. 2004. A case study in pervasive game design: The Songs of North. In Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '04), 413416. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1028014.1028083Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Irma Lindt, Jan Ohlenburg, Uta Pankoke-Babatz, and Sabiha Ghellal. 2007. A report on the crossmedia game epidemic menace. Computers in Entertainment, 5, 1. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1236224.1236237 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Adam Martin, Brooke Thompson, and Tom Chatfield (eds.) 2006. 2006 alternate reality games white paper. International Game Developers Association IGDA. Retrieved September 21, 2016 from http://igda.org/arg/resources/IGDA-AlternateRealityGames-Whitepaper-2006.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Markus Montola. 2010. A ludological view on the pervasive mixed-reality game research paradigm. In Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 15, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Markus Montola, Jaakko Stenros, and Annika Waern. 2009. Pervasive Games: Theory and Design. Morgan Kaufman, Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kenton O'Hara. 2008. Understanding geocaching practices and motivations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08), 1177--1186. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1357054.1357239Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Janne Paavilainen, Juho Hamari, Jaakko Stenros, and Jani Kinnunen. 2013. Social Network Games: Players' Perspective. Simulation & Gaming. 44 ,6, 794--820. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Janne Paavilainen, Hannu Korhonen, Hannamari Saarenpää, and Jussi Holopainen. 2009. Player Perception of Context Information Utilization in Pervasive Mobile Games. In Proceedings of the 2009 DiGRA Conference, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Johan Peitz, Hannamari Saarenpää, and Staffan Björk. Insectopia: exploring pervasive games through technology already pervasively available. 2007. In Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (ACE'07), 107--114. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1255047.1255069Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Maeve Serino, Kyla Cordrey, Laura McLaughlin, and Ruth L. Milanaik. 2016. Pokémon Go and augmented virtual reality games: a cautionary commentary for parents and pediatricians. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 28, 5, 673--677. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000409 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Olli Sotamaa. 2002. All the world's a botfighter stage: Notes on location-based multi-user gaming. In Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference, Frans Mäyrä (ed.). Tampere University Press, Tampere, Finland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Clare Southerton. 2014. 'Zombies, Run!': Rethinking immersion in light of nontraditional gaming contexts. In Transmedia Practice: A Collective Approach, Debra Polson, Ann-Marie Cooke, J.T. Velikovsky, J.T., and Adam Brackin (eds.). Inter-Disciplinary Press, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jaakko Stenros. 2016. Playfulness, Play, and Games: A Constructionist Ludology Approach. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Tampere, Finland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Swrve. 2016. Monetization Report 2016. Lifting the Lid on Player Spend Patterns in Mobile. Retrieved September 21, 2016 from https://www.swrve.com/images/uploads/resources/swr ve-monetization-report-2016.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Pokémon GO Experience: A Location-Based Augmented Reality Mobile Game Goes Mainstream

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader