skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025887acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access
Best Paper

MakerWear: A Tangible Approach to Interactive Wearable Creation for Children

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wearable construction toolkits have shown promise in broadening participation in computing and empowering users to create personally meaningful computational designs. However, these kits present a high barrier of entry for some users, particularly young children (K-6). In this paper, we introduce MakerWear, a new wearable construction kit for children that uses a tangible, modular approach to wearable creation. We describe our participatory design process, the iterative development of MakerWear, and results from single- and multi-session workshops with 32 children (ages 5-12; M=8.3 years). Our findings reveal how children engage in wearable design, what they make (and want to make), and what challenges they face. As a secondary analysis, we also explore age-related differences.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn3295.mp4

mp4

89.3 MB

pn3295p.mp4

mp4

5.4 MB

p133-kazemitabaar.mp4

mp4

282.4 MB

References

  1. Edith Ackermann. 1996. Perspective-taking and object construction. In Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world, Yasmin B. Kafai and Mitchel Resnick (eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 107--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. LLC Adafruit Industries. FLORA: A wearable Arduinocompatible electronics platform. Retrieved March 14, 2015 from https://www.adafruit.com/products/659Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. LLC Adafruit Industries. 2012. Announcing the FLORA, Adafruit's wearable electronics platform and accessories. Retrieved July 1, 2015 from https://blog.adafruit.com/2012/01/20/announcing-theflora-adafruits-wearable-electronics-platform-andaccessories/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayah Bdeir and Ted Ullrich. 2011. Electronics as material: littleBits. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction - TEI '11, ACM Press, 341--344. Retrieved March 15, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1935701.1935781Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. U. Bers and Michael S. Horn. 2010. Tangible programming in early childhood: Revisiting developmental assumptions through new technologies. In High-tech tots: Childhood in a digital world. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, 49--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marina Umaschi Bers, Louise Flannery, Elizabeth R Kazakoff, and Amanda Sullivan. 2014. Computational Thinking and Tinkering: Exploration of an Early Childhood Robotics Curriculum. Comput. Educ. 72: 145-- 157. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Paulo Blikstein. 2013. Gears of Our Childhood: Constructionist Toolkits, Robotics, and Physical Computing, Past and Future. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 173--182. http://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485786 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101. http://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Karen Brennan and Mitchel Resnick. 2012. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Leah Buechley and Michael Eisenberg. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: Toward Wearable Engineering for Everyone. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 2: 12--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '08, ACM Press, 423--432. Retrieved March 15, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1357054.1357123Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Leah Buechley, Nwanua Elumeze, Camille Dodson, and Michael Eisenberg. 2005. Quilt Snaps: A Fabric Based Computational Construction Kit. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, IEEE Computer Society, 219-- 221. http://doi.org/10.1109/WMTE.2005.55 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Leah Buechley and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2010. LilyPad in the Wild: How Hardware's Long Tail is Supporting New Engineering and Design Communities. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems DIS '10, ACM Press, 199--207. Retrieved March 15, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1858171.1858206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Carol Copple and Sue Bredekamp (eds.). 2009. Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8. National Association for the Education of Young Children, Washington, DC, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. fabrickit. Fabrick Kit. Retrieved June 1, 2016 from http://www.fabrick.it/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Louise P Flannery, Brian Silverman, Elizabeth R Kazakoff, Marina Umaschi Bers, Paula Bontá, and Mitchel Resnick. 2013. Designing ScratchJr: Support for Early Childhood Learning Through Computer Programming. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 1-- 10. http://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485785 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational codesign. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1: 14--23. Retrieved February 4, 2015 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221286 8912000049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sibel Deren Guler and Michael Everett Rule. 2013. Invent-abling: Enabling Inventiveness Through Craft. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 368--371. http://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485801 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lynne Hall, Colette Hume, and Sarah Tazzyman. 2016. Five Degrees of Happiness: Effective Smiley Faced Likert Scales for Evaluating with Children. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Interaction Design and Children Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Michael S Horn, R Jordan Crouser, and Marina U Bers. 2012. Tangible Interaction and Learning: The Case for a Hybrid Approach. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 16, 4: 379--389. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0404--2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Michael S Horn and Robert J K Jacob. 2007. Designing Tangible Programming Languages for Classroom Use. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, ACM, 159--162. http://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1227003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Felix Hu, Ariel Zekelman, Michael Horn, and Frances Judd. 2015. Strawbies: Explorations in Tangible Programming. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 410--413. http://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771866 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jennifer Jacobs, Mitchel Resnick, and Leah Buechley. 2014. Dresscode: Supporting Youth in Computational Design and Making. Constructionism and Creativity. Retrieved from http://constructionism2014.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/papers/3.2_18520.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yasmin B. Kafai, Deborah A. Fields, and Kristin A. Searle. 2012. Making Technology Visible: Connecting the Learning of Crafts, Circuitry and Coding in Youth eTextile Designs. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), 188--195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yasmin B. Kafai, Eunkyoung Lee, Kristin Searle, Deborah Fields, Eliot Kaplan, and Debora Lui. 2014. A Crafts-Oriented Approach to Computing in High School. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 14, 1: 1--20. Retrieved January 31, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2600089.2576874Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yasmin B. Kafai and Kylie A. Peppler. 2014. Transparency Reconsidered: Creative, Critical, and Connected Making with E-textiles. In DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media, Matt Ratto, Megan Boler and Ronald Deibert (eds.). MIT Press, 179--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yasmin B. Kafai and Mitchel Resnick. 1996. Introduction. In Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World (1st Editio), Yasmin B. Kafai and Mitchel Resnick (eds.). Routledge, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yasmin Kafai, Deborah Fields, and Kristin Searle. 2014. Electronic Textiles as Disruptive Designs: Supporting and Challenging Maker Activities in Schools. Harvard Educational Review 84, 4: 532--556. Retrieved June 5, 2015 from http://hepgjournals.org/doi/abs/10.17763/haer.84.4.46m7372370214783?journalCode=haer Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Eva-Sophie Katterfeldt, Nadine Dittert, and Heidi Schelhowe. 2009. EduWear: Smart Textiles As Ways of Relating Computing Technology to Everyday Life. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 9--17. http://doi.org/10.1145/1551788.1551791 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Elizabeth R Kazakoff and Marina Umaschi Bers. 2014. Put Your Robot in, Put Your Robot out: Sequencing through Programming Robots in Early Childhood. Journal of Educational Computing Research 50, 4: 553--573. http://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.4.f Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Caitlin Kelleher and Randy Pausch. 2005. Lowering the Barriers to Programming: A Taxonomy of Programming Environments and Languages for Novice Programmers. ACM Comput. Surv. 37, 2: 83--137. http://doi.org/10.1145/1089733.1089734 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Winnie W Y Lau, Grace Ngai, Stephen C F Chan, and Joey C Y Cheung. 2009. Learning Programming Through Fashion and Design: A Pilot Summer Course in Wearable Computing for Middle School Students. Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM, 504--508. http://doi.org/10.1145/1508865.1509041 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. littleBits Electronics Inc. littleBits. Retrieved June 25, 2015 from http://littlebits.ccGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Modular Robotics. Cubelets. Retrieved July 1, 2015 from http://www.modrobotics.com/cubeletsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Grace Ngai, Stephen C.F. Chan, Joey C.Y. Cheung, and Winnie W.Y. Lau. 2009. The TeeBoard: an education friendly construction platform for e-textiles and wearable computing. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI 09, ACM Press, 249. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518742 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Grace Ngai, Stephen C.F. Chan, Hong Va Leong, and Vincent T.Y. Ng. 2013. Designing i*CATch: A multipurpose, education-friendly construction kit for physical and wearable computing. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 13, 2: 1--30. Retrieved February 17, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2483710.2483712Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Grace Ngai, Stephen C.F. Chan, Vincent T.Y. Ng, et al. 2010. i*CATch: a scalable plug-n-play wearable computing framework for novices and children. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '10, ACM Press, 443--452. Retrieved March 16, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1753326.1753393Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Seymour Papert. 1993. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, Inc., New York, New York.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Hannah Perner-Wilson, Leah Buechley, and Mika Satomi. 2011. Handcrafting textile interfaces from a kit-of-noparts. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction - TEI '11, ACM Press, 61. Retrieved March 16, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org.proxyum.researchport.umd.edu/citation.cfm?id=1935701.19357Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Jean Piaget. 1952. The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Dylan J Portelance and Marina Umaschi Bers. 2015. Code and Tell: Assessing Young Children's Learning of Computational Thinking Using Peer Video Interviews with ScratchJr. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 271--274. http://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771894 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Cyndi Rader, Cathy Brand, and Clayton Lewis. 1997. Degrees of Comprehension: Children's Understanding of a Visual Programming Environment. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 351--358. http://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258793 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Mitchel Resnick, Fred Martin, Robert Berg, et al. 1998. Digital manipulatives: new toys to think with. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '98, ACM Press, 281--287. Retrieved March 3, 2014 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=274644.274684Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Mitchel Resnick and Eric Rosenbaum. 2013. Designing for Tinkerability. In Design, Make, Play?: Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators, Margaret Honey and David E Kanter (eds.). Routledge, 182--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Mitchel Resnick, Brian Silverman, Yasmin Kafai, et al. 2009. Scratch: Programming for All. Communications of the ACM 52, 11: 60. http://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Mitchel Resnick and Brian Silverman. 2005. Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids. Proceeding of the 2005 conference on Interaction design and children - IDC '05, ACM Press, 117--122. Retrieved March 16, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1109540.1109556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Eric Schweikardt and Mark D Gross. 2006. roBlocks: A Robotic Construction Kit for Mathematics and Science Education. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ACM, 72--75. http://doi.org/10.1145/1180995.1181010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Kristin A. Searle, Deborah A. Fields, Debora A. Lui, and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2014. Diversifying high school students' views about computing with electronic textiles. Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research - ICER '14, ACM Press, 75--82. Retrieved June 5, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2632320.2632352Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Robert S. Siegler, Judy S. DeLoache, and Nancy Eisenberg. 2010. How Children Develop. Worth Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. David Canfield Smith, Allen Cypher, and Jim Spohrer. 1994. KidSim: Programming Agents Without a Programming Language. Commun. ACM 37, 7: 54--67. http://doi.org/10.1145/176789.176795 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Amanda Strawhacker and Marina U. Bers. 2014. "I want my robot to look for food": Comparing Kindergartner's programming comprehension using tangible, graphic, and hybrid user interfaces. International Journal of Technology and Design Education: 1--27. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014--9287--7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Amanda Strawhacker, Melissa Lee, Claire Caine, and Marina Bers. 2015. ScratchJr Demo: A Coding Language for Kindergarten. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 414--417. http://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771867 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Amanda Sullivan and Marina Umaschi Bers. 2016. Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in prekindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 26, 1: 3--20. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015--9304--5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Heather Biggar Tomlinson. 2009. Developmentally Appropriate Practice in the Kindergarten Year-Ages 5--6. In Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8 (Third Edit), Carol Copple and Sue Bredekamp (eds.). National Association for the Education of Young Children, Washington, DC, USA, 187--216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Shirin Vossoughi and Bronwyn Bevan. 2014. Making and Tinkering: A Review of the Literature. Retrieved from http://www.sesp.northwestern.edu/docs/publications/1926 024546baba2b73c7.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Peta Wyeth and Gordon F Wyeth. 2001. Electronic blocks: Tangible programming elements for preschoolers. IFIP TC. 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 496--503.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Peta Wyeth. 2008. How Young Children Learn to Program With Sensor, Action, and Logic Blocks. Journal of the Learning Sciences 17, 4: 517--550. http://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802395069 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Oren Zuckerman, Saeed Arida, and Mitchel Resnick. 2005. Extending Tangible Interfaces for Education: Digital Montessori-inspired Manipulatives. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '05, ACM Press, 859--868. http://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055093 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. MakerWear: A Tangible Approach to Interactive Wearable Creation for Children

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2017
        7138 pages
        ISBN:9781450346559
        DOI:10.1145/3025453

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader