skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025995acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Simple Nod of the Head: The Effect of Minimal Robot Movements on Children's Perception of a Low-Anthropomorphic Robot

Published: 02 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

In this note, we present minimal robot movements for robotic technology for children. Two types of minimal gaze movements were designed: social-gaze movements to communicate social engagement and deictic-gaze movements to communicate task-related referential information. In a two (social-gaze movements vs. none) by two (deictic-gaze movements vs. none) video-based study (n=72), we found that social-gaze movements significantly increased children's perception of animacy and likeability of the robot. Deictic-gaze and social-gaze movements significantly increased children's perception of helpfulness. Our findings show the compelling communicative power of social-gaze movements, and to a lesser extent deictic-gaze movements, and have implications for designers who want to achieve animacy, likeability and helpfulness with simple and easily implementable minimal robot movements. Our work contributes to human-robot interaction research and design by providing a first indication of the potential of minimal robot movements to communicate social engagement and helpful referential information to children.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p336-zaga.mp4)

References

[1]
Edith K Ackermann. 2005. Playthings that do things: a young kid's incredibles!. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Interaction design and children. ACM, 1--8.
[2]
Sean Andrist, Bilge Mutlu, and Adriana Tapus. 2015. Look Like Me: Matching Robot Personality via Gaze to Increase Motivation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3603--3612.
[3]
Sean Andrist, Tomislav Pejsa, Bilge Mutlu, and Michael Gleicher. 2012. Designing Effective Gaze Mechanisms for Virtual Agents. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 705--714.
[4]
Christoph Bartneck, Elizabeth Croft, and Dana Kulic. 2009. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 1 (2009), 71--81.
[5]
Tony Belpaeme, Paul Baxter, Joachim de Greeff, James Kennedy, Robin Read, Rosemarijn Looije, Mark Neerincx, Ilaria Baroni, and Mattia Coti Zelati. 2013. Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 452--459.
[6]
Allison Bruce, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Reid Simmons. 2002. The role of expressiveness and attention in human-robot interaction. In Robotics and Automation, 2002. Proceedings. ICRA'02. IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 4. IEEE, 4138--4142.
[7]
Álvaro Castro-González, Henny Admoni, and Brian Scassellati. 2016. Effects of form and motion on judgments of social robots's animacy, likability, trustworthiness and unpleasantness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 90 (2016), 27--38.
[8]
David Feil-Seifer and Maja Matarić. 2008. Robot-assisted Therapy for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--52.
[9]
Ylva Fernaeus, Maria Håkansson, Mattias Jacobsson, and Sara Ljungblad. 2010. How Do You Play with a Robotic Toy Animal?: A Long-term Study of Pleo. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39--48.
[10]
Julia Fink, Séverin Lemaignan, Pierre Dillenbourg, Philippe Rétornaz, Florian Vaussard, Alain Berthoud, Francesco Mondada, Florian Wille, and Karmen Franinović. 2014. Which Robot Behavior Can Motivate Children to Tidy Up Their Toys?: Design and Evaluation of "Ranger". In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 439--446.
[11]
Maia Garau, Mel Slater, Simon Bee, and Martina Angela Sasse. 2001. The Impact of Eye Gaze on Communication Using Humanoid Avatars. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 309--316.
[12]
Victor Girotto, Cecil Lozano, Kasia Muldner, Winslow Burleson, and Erin Walker. 2016. Lessons Learned from In-School Use of rTAG: A Robo-Tangible Learning Environment. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 919--930.
[13]
Guy Hoffman and Wendy Ju. 2014. Designing robots with movement in mind. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3, 1 (2014), 89--122.
[14]
Sooyeon Jeong, Kristopher Dos Santos, Suzanne Graca, Brianna O'Connell, Laurel Anderson, Nicole Stenquist, Katie Fitzpatrick, Honey Goodenough, Deirdre Logan, Peter Weinstock, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2015. Designing a Socially Assistive Robot for Pediatric Care. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 387--390.
[15]
Carey Jewitt. 2012. An introduction to using video for research. (2012).
[16]
Susan C Johnson. 2003. Detecting agents. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358, 1431 (2003), 549--559.
[17]
Peter H Kahn, Heather E Gary, and Solace Shen. 2013. Children's Social Relationships With Current and Near-Future Robots. Child Development Perspectives 7, 1 (2013), 32--37.
[18]
Heather Knight and Reid Simmons. 2014. Expressive motion with x, y and theta: Laban effort features for mobile robots. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 267--273.
[19]
Heather Knight, Ravenna Thielstrom, and Reid Simmons. 2016. Expressive path shape (swagger): Simple features that illustrate a robot's attitude toward its goal in real time. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 1475--1482.
[20]
Hagen Lehmann, Joan Saez-Pons, Dag Sverre Syrdal, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2015. In Good Company? Perception of Movement Synchrony of a Non-Anthropomorphic Robot. PloS one 10, 5 (2015), e0127747.
[21]
Daniel Leyzberg, Samuel Spaulding, Mariya Toneva, and Brian Scassellati. 2012. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. (2012).
[22]
Manja Lohse, Niels van Berkel, Elisabeth MAG van Dijk, Michiel P Joosse, Daphne E Karreman, and Vanessa Evers. 2013. The influence of approach speed and functional noise on users' perception of a robot. In 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 1670--1675.
[23]
Panos Markopoulos, Janet C Read, Stuart MacFarlane, and Johanna Hoysniemi. 2008. Evaluating children's interactive products: principles and practices for interaction designers. Morgan Kaufmann.
[24]
Masahiro Mori, Karl F MacDorman, and Norri Kageki. 2012. The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 19, 2 (2012), 98--100.
[25]
Bilge Mutlu, Toshiyuki Shiwa, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2009. Footing in Human-robot Conversations: How Robots Might Shape Participant Roles Using Gaze Cues. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61--68.
[26]
Sandra Y Okita and Daniel L Schwartz. 2006. Young children's understanding of animacy and entertainment robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 3, 03 (2006), 393--412.
[27]
David H Rakison and Diane Poulin-Dubois. 2001. Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychological bulletin 127, 2 (2001), 209.
[28]
Janet C. Read, SJ MacFarlane, and Chris Casey. 2002. Endurability, engagement and expectations: Measuring children's fun. In Interaction design and children, Vol. 2. Shaker Publishing Eindhoven, 1--23.
[29]
Martin Saerbeck, Tom Schut, Christoph Bartneck, and Maddy D. Janse. 2010. Expressive Robots in Education: Varying the Degree of Social Supportive Behavior of a Robotic Tutor. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1613--1622.
[30]
Leonhard Schilbach, Bert Timmermans, Vasudevi Reddy, Alan Costall, Gary Bente, Tobias Schlicht, and Kai Vogeley. 2013. Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36, 04 (2013), 393--414.
[31]
David Sirkin and Wendy Ju. 2014. Using embodied design improvisation as a design research tool. In Proceedings of the international conference on Human Behavior in Design (HBiD 2014), Ascona, Switzerland.
[32]
David Sirkin, Brian Mok, Stephen Yang, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Mechanical Ottoman: How Robotic Furniture Offers and Withdraws Support. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--18.
[33]
Vasant Srinivasan and Leila Takayama. 2016. Help Me Please: Robot Politeness Strategies for Soliciting Help From Humans. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4945--4955.
[34]
Megan Strait, Cody Canning, and Matthias Scheutz. 2014. Let Me Tell You! Investigating the Effects of Robot Communication Strategies in Advice-giving Situations Based on Robot Appearance, Interaction Modality and Distance. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 479--486.
[35]
Megan Strait, Lara Vujovic, Victoria Floerke, Matthias Scheutz, and Heather Urry. 2015. Too Much Humanness for Human-Robot Interaction: Exposure to Highly Humanlike Robots Elicits Aversive Responding in Observers. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3593--3602.
[36]
Leila Takayama, Doug Dooley, and Wendy Ju. 2011. Expressing Thought: Improving Robot Readability with Animation Principles. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 69--76.
[37]
Michael Tomasello. 1999. The cultural ecology of young children's interactions with objects and artifacts. Ecological approaches to cognition: Essays in honor of Ulric Neisser (1999), 153--170.
[38]
Ryan Wistort. 2010. Only Robots on the Inside. interactions 17, 2 (March 2010), 72--74.
[39]
Sarah Woods, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Joerg Schulz. 2004. The design space of robots: Investigating children's views. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2004. ROMAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on. IEEE, 47--52.
[40]
Sarah N Woods, Michael L Walters, Kheng Lee Koay, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2006. Methodological issues in HRI: A comparison of live and video-based methods in robot to human approach direction trials. In ROMAN 2006-The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 51--58.
[41]
Selma Yilmazyildiz, Robin Read, Tony Belpeame, and Werner Verhelst. 2016. Review of Semantic-Free Utterances in Social Human--Robot Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 32, 1 (2016), 63--85.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)TableBot: Getting a Handle on Hybrid Collaboration by Negotiating Control of a Tabletop Telepresence RobotProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685350(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)From Agent Autonomy to Casual Collaboration: A Design Investigation on Help-Seeking Urban RobotsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642389(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)The Power of Atmosphere: LLM-Based Social Task Generation of Robots2024 21st International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR)10.1109/UR61395.2024.10597450(532-538)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A Simple Nod of the Head: The Effect of Minimal Robot Movements on Children's Perception of a Low-Anthropomorphic Robot

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2017
    7138 pages
    ISBN:9781450346559
    DOI:10.1145/3025453
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. children
    2. human-robot interaction design
    3. non-anthropomorphic robot
    4. nonverbal communication
    5. robot behavior

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '17
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 600 of 2,400 submissions, 25%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)TableBot: Getting a Handle on Hybrid Collaboration by Negotiating Control of a Tabletop Telepresence RobotProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685350(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)From Agent Autonomy to Casual Collaboration: A Design Investigation on Help-Seeking Urban RobotsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642389(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)The Power of Atmosphere: LLM-Based Social Task Generation of Robots2024 21st International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR)10.1109/UR61395.2024.10597450(532-538)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Anthropomorphism and Affective Perception: Dimensions, Measurements, and Interdependencies in Aerial RoboticsIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing10.1109/TAFFC.2024.334985815:3(1463-1474)Online publication date: Jul-2024
    • (2024)Designing Conversational Human-Robot Collaborations in SilenceDesign, User Experience, and Usability10.1007/978-3-031-61353-1_7(97-113)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Towards a conceptualisation and critique of everyday life in HRIFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2023.121203410Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
    • (2022)The LMA12-O Framework for Emotional Robot Eye Gestures2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900752(442-449)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Preschool children’s social and playful interactions with a play-facilitating cardboard robotInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.10043531:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2022
    • (2021)Effects of Incomplete Utterance on Conversational Engagement in a Multiparty Conversation多人数会話を構成するロボットの言葉足らずな発話が人の会話への参加態度に及ぼす影響Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence10.1527/tjsai.36-2_B-K4436:2(B-K44_1-12)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
    • (2021)Learning from robotic artefacts: A quest for strong concepts in Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3461778.3462095(1356-1365)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media