skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3026051acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Reworking the Gaps between Design and Ethnography

Published: 02 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Since Dourish's critique of 'implications for design' [15], researchers have asked how design and ethnography should or could relate in HCI. Here we reflect on two experiences with cross-informing ongoing ethnographic investigation with the early stages of research through design. One uses speculative design to reflect on and inform ethnographic fieldwork on busyness in middle-class familes; the other uses speculative design to complement late-stage analysis of a historical ethnography of rural technological infrastructure. Rather than trying to do away with the gap between ethnography and design by seamlessly integrating the two processes, we reworked the relationship between ethnography and design by closing the gap in the temporal workflows while simultaneously maintaining a distinction in the performance of the two roles. We found that this new gap resulted in a series of misunderstandings; but by putting the two roles in active dialogue, we were able leverage misunderstandings into mutual benefit.

References

[1]
Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2015. Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2093--2102.
[2]
Bardzell, S. et al., 201 Critical Design and Critical Theory: The Challenge of Designing for Provocation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. DIS '12. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 288--297. Available at:
[3]
Barry, Andrew, Georgina Born, and Gisa Weszkalnys. "Logics of interdisciplinarity." Economy and Society 37.1 (2008): 20--49.
[4]
Ditte Amund Basballe and Kim Halskov. 2012. Dynamics of research through design. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 58--67.
[5]
Richard L. Baskerville and Michael D. Myers. "Design ethnography in information systems." Information Systems Journal 21 (2015): 23--46.
[6]
Jacob Buur, Euan Fraser, Soila Oinonen, and Max Rolfstam. 2010. Ethnographic video as design specs. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--5
[7]
Genevieve Bell, Mark Blythe, and Phoebe Sengers. 2005. Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 2 (June 2005), 149--173.
[8]
Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, Boriana Koleva, Stefan Rennick Egglestone, Gabriella Giannachi, Matt Adams, Nick Tandavanitj, and Ju Row Farr. 2013. Performance-Led Research in the Wild. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 3, Article 14 (July 2013), 22 pages.
[9]
Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, and Paul Dourish. 2007. How HCI interprets the probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1077--1086.
[10]
John Bowers. 2012. The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of 'research through design'. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 68--77.
[11]
1Andy Crabtree, Terry Hemmings, Tom Rodden, Keith Cheverst, Karen Clarke, Guy Dewsbury, John Hughes, and Mark Rouncefield. "Designing with care: Adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings." In Proceedings of the 2004 Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI2004), pp. 4--13. 2003.
[12]
Andrew Crabtree, Tom Rodden, Peter Tolmie, and Graham Button. 2009. Ethnography considered harmful. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 879--888.
[13]
Damsholt, Tine, and M. Krogh Pedersen. "Everyday life as always already problematized and (at times) problematizing: towards a new division of labour between ethnography and design." In Research Network for Design Anthropology, seminar, vol. 2
[14]
Carl DiSalvo."Design and the Construction of Publics." Design issues 25, no. 1 (2009): 48--63.
[15]
Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), Rebecca Grinter, Thomas Rodden, Paul Aoki, Ed Cutrell, Robin Jeffries, and Gary Olson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 541--550.
[16]
Paul Dourish. 2007. Responsibilities and implications: further thoughts on ethnography and design. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing for User eXperiences (DUX '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 25, 15 pages.
[17]
Paul Dourish, Janet Finlay, Phoebe Sengers, and Peter Wright. "Reflective HCI: Towards a critical technical practice." In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1727--1728. ACM, 2004.
[18]
Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, 2013.
[19]
Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. Springer Science & Business Media, 2001.
[20]
Christopher Frayling. "Research in Art and Design (Royal College of Art Research Papers, Vol 1, No 1, 1993/4)." (1994).
[21]
2Fitton, D, Chevherst, K., Rouncefield, M., Dix, A. and Crabtree, A. (2004) Probing Technology with Technology Probes. Paper presented at the Equator Workshop on Record and Replay Technologies.
[22]
2Anne Galloway (2013). Emergent media technologies, speculation, expectation, and human/nonhuman relations. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 53--65.
[23]
William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 937--946.
[24]
William Gaver. 2011. Making spaces: how design workbooks work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1551--1560.
[25]
William W. Gaver, Andrew Boucher, Sarah Pennington, and Brendan Walker. 2004. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. interactions 11, 5 (September 2004), 53--56.
[26]
Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural probes. interactions 6, 1 (January 1999), 21--29.
[27]
Bill Gaver and Heather Martin. 2000. Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 209--216.
[28]
William Gaver, Phoebe Sengers, Tobie Kerridge, Joseph Kaye, and John Bowers. 2007. Enhancing ubiquitous computing with user interpretation: field testing the home health horoscope. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 537--546.
[29]
Wendy Gunn, Ton Otto, and Rachel Charlotte Smith, eds. Design anthropology: theory and practice. A&C Black, 2013.
[30]
Wendy Gunn and Løgstrup, L.B., 2014. Participant observation, anthropology methodology and design anthropology research inquiry. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, p.1474022214543874
[31]
3Akhil Gupta, and James Ferguson. "Discipline and practice: "The field" as site, method, and location in anthropology." Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science 100 (1997): 1--47.
[32]
3Megan K. Halpern, Ingrid Erickson, Laura Forlano, and Geri K. Gay. 2013. Designing collaboration: comparing cases exploring cultural probes as boundary-negotiating objects. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1093--1102.
[33]
3Joachim Halse "Ethnographies of the Possible." Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice (2013): London: Bloomsbury Academic, 180--196.
[34]
Donna J. Haraway, (1997). Modest? Witness@ Second? Millennium. FemaleMan? Meets? OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. Psychology Press.
[35]
Steve Harrison, Phoebe Sengers, and Deborah Tatar. "Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science." Interacting with Computers 23.5 (2011): 385--392.
[36]
Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Phoebe Sengers. "The three paradigms of HCI." Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems San Jose, California, USA. 2007.
[37]
3Terry Hemmings, Karen Clarke, Mark Rouncefield, Andy Crabtree, and Tom Rodden. "Probing the probes." Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Participatory Design 2002-06--23 p.42--50
[38]
3Jamer Hunt. "Prototyping the social: temporality and speculative futures at the intersection of design and culture." Design Anthropology. Springer Vienna, 2011. 33--44.
[39]
3Lilly Irani, Paul Dourish, and Melissa Mazmanian. "Shopping for sharpies in Seattle: mundane infrastructures of transnational design." In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Intercultural collaboration, pp. 39--48. ACM, 2010
[40]
Matthias Korn, and Amy Voida. "Creating friction: infrastructuring civic engagement in everyday life." In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives, pp. 145--156. Aarhus University Press, 2015. .
[41]
4Leslie Lamport, Robert Shostak, and Marshall Pease. "The Byzantine generals problem." ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) 4, no. 3 (1982): 382--401...
[42]
4James A. Landay, and Brad A. Myers. "Interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design." Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1995.
[43]
4Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford, eds. Inventive methods: The happening of the social. Routledge, 2012
[44]
4Keith M. Murphy and George E. Marcus. "Epilogue: Ethnography and design, ethnography in design... ethnography by design." Design anthropology: Theory and practice (2013): 251--268.
[45]
4Noortje Marres Material participation: technology, the environment and everyday publics. Springer, 2016
[46]
4Melissa Mazmanian, Ingrid Erickson, and Ellie Harmon. "Circumscribed time and porous time: Logics as a way of studying temporality." In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1453--1464. ACM, 2015.
[47]
4Mike Michael. "'What are we busy doing'? Engaging the idiot". Science, Technology & Human Values 37.5 (2012): 528--554.
[48]
4Keith M. Murphy. (2015). Swedish Design: An Ethnography. Cornell University Press.
[49]
4Olander, Sissel. "Some aspects and characteristics of design anthropology as a post-critical practise." (2014).
[50]
James Pierce (2015). Working by Not Quite Working: Designing Resistant Interactive Proposals, Prototypes, and Products (Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University).
[51]
5Paul Rabinow, George E. Marcus, James D. Faubion, and Tobias Rees. Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary. Duke University Press, 2008.
[52]
5Daniela K. Rosner, Margaret E. Morris, Ariel Duncan, Sarah E. Fox, Kathi R. Kitner, Ankur Agrawal, and Mei J. Chen. 2016. Designing for Movement in Public Life with Itinerant Probes. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1072--1082.
[53]
5Fabian Segelström, and Stefan Holmlid. "Ethnography by design: On goals and mediating artefacts." Arts and Humanities in Higher Education (2014): 1474022214560159.
[54]
5Phoebe Sengers. "Must Design Become Scientific"? DIS 2006 Workshop on Exploring Design as a Re-search Activity, June 2006.
[55]
5Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (CC '05), Olav W. Bertelsen, Niels Olof Bouvin, Peter G. Krogh, and Morten Kyng (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--58.
[56]
5Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems (DIS '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 99--108.
[57]
5Sherry Turkle. (2008). Falling for science: Objects in mind. MIT Press.
[58]
5Ron Wakkary, William Odom, Sabrina Hauser, Garnet Hertz, and Henry Lin. 2015. Material speculation: actual artifacts for critical inquiry. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (AA '15). Aarhus University Press 97--108.
[59]
5Tracee Vetting Wolf, Jennifer A. Rode, Jeremy Sussman, and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2006. Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), Rebecca Grinter, Thomas Rodden, Paul Aoki, Ed Cutrell, Robin Jeffries, and Gary Olson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 521--530.
[60]
Susan Wyche, Phoebe Sengers, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2006. Historical analysis: using the past to design the future. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'06), Paul Dourish and Adrian Friday (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 35--51.
[61]
6Susan P. Wyche and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2012. Using sketching to support design research in new ways: a case study investigating design and charismatic pentecostalism in São Paulo, Brazil. In Proceedings of the 2012 iConference (iConference '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 63--71.
[62]
6John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493--502.
[63]
6John Zimmerman, Erik Stolterman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 310--319.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)'Better than Google': Information Activism for LGBTQ+ Young Adults in a Rural CommunityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869918:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)A Culturally-Aware AI Tool for Crowdworkers: Leveraging Chronemics to Support Diverse Work StylesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36868998:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Taking the bizarre seriously: dreams as a material for interaction designProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661562(699-713)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Reworking the Gaps between Design and Ethnography

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2017
    7138 pages
    ISBN:9781450346559
    DOI:10.1145/3025453
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ethnography
    2. inventive methods
    3. speculative design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CHI '17
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 600 of 2,400 submissions, 25%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)311
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)41
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)'Better than Google': Information Activism for LGBTQ+ Young Adults in a Rural CommunityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869918:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)A Culturally-Aware AI Tool for Crowdworkers: Leveraging Chronemics to Support Diverse Work StylesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36868998:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Taking the bizarre seriously: dreams as a material for interaction designProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661562(699-713)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Amazon Z to A: Speculative Design to Understand the Future of Labor-Intensive WorkplacesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661561(314-327)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)A Turn to Assets in Community-Based Computing Research: Tradeoffs, Deficits, and Neoliberalism in Technological DevelopmentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36372918:CSCW1(1-20)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Who is “I”?: Subjectivity and Ethnography in HCIProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642727(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)(Re)Connecting History to the Theory and Praxis of HCIACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/358980430:2(1-7)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Another Rant About TechnologyTorn Many Ways10.1007/978-3-031-31642-5_5(55-71)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Noticing the Environment – A Design Ethnography of Urban FarmingNordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3546155.3546659(1-13)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Stories from the Frontline: Recuperating Essential Worker Accounts of AI IntegrationProceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3532106.3533564(58-70)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media