skip to main content
10.1145/3027063.3027120acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Designing for Ambivalence: Mothers, Transitional Objects and Smartphones

Published:06 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

For many women, the first few years of motherhood demand complex negotiations of maternal and work related roles. The versatility of smartphones, functioning for both work and play, can add complexity to the blurring of boundaries in this period: the phone is often used for work while doing childcare, and at other times to keep children quiet or entertained. Transforming from tool into toy, it becomes an object of competition for parental attention, but equally turns the mother into a rival since its use is often shared. My research investigates how design can explore the relationship between mother, child and the smartphone, using proposals to expose the tensions brought by this device in family life.

References

  1. James Auger. 2013. Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity, Vol 24, issue Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Lisa Baraitser. 2009. Maternal encounters: the ethics of interruption. London: RoutledgeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. CHI 2010, April 10--15, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Spectacles and Tropes: Speculative Design and Contemporary Food Cultures. Fibre culture: Special Issue on Networked Utopias and Speculative Futures, Issue 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bill Gaver, Anthonny Dunne, Elena Pacenti. 1998. Design: Cultural Probes. Interactions, Vol 6 Issue 1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bill Gaver and Heather Martin. 2000. Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. In Proceedings CHI 2000, ACM Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. William Gaver, Andy Boucher, Andy Law, Sarah Pennington, John Bowers, Jacob Beaver, Jan Humble, Tobie Kerridge, Nicholas Villar, Alex Wilkie. 2008. Threshold devices: looking out from the home. Proc. CHI 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. William Gaver, Mike Michael, Tobie Kerridge, Alex Wilkie, Andy Boucher, Liliana Ovalle, Matthew Plummer-Fernandez. 2015. Energy Babble: Mixing Environmentally-Oriented Internet Content to Engage Community Groups. Proc. CHI 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Alexis Hiniker, Kiley Sobel, Hyewon Suh, Yi-Chen Sung, Charlotte P. Lee, Julie A. Kientz. 2015.Texting while Parenting: How Adults Use Mobile Phones while Caring for Children at the Playground. Human Centered Design and Engineering University of Washington . CHI 2015, April 18 - 23, Seoul.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. David S. Kirk, David Chatting, Paulina Yurman, Jo-Anne Bichard. 2016. Ritual Machines I & II: Making Technology at Home. Proc. CHI 2016 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Daniel Miller. 2010. Stuff. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Carman Neustaedler and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Autobiographical Design in HCI Research: Designing and Learning through Use-It-Yourself. DIS 2012, June 11--15 Newcastle, UKGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Christena Nippert-Eng. 1996. Home and work: negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago,IL; London: University of Chicago Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Rozsika Parker. 2005. Torn in two: the experience of maternal ambivalence. London: Virago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sara Routarinne and Johan Redström. 2007. Domestication as Design Intervention. University of Art and Design, Helsinki, Finland?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanna Segal. 1973. Introduction to the Work of Melanie Klein. Karnac Books, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sandra L. Triebenbacher. 1998. Pets as Transitional Objects: Their Role in Children's Emotional Development. Psychological Reports, 1998, 82, 191--200 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ron Wakkary, William Odom, Sabrina Hauser, Garnet Hertz , Henry Lin. 2015. Material speculation: actual artifacts for critical inquiry. 5th Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives August 17 -- 21, 2015, Aarhus DenmarkGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Donald Winnicott. 1949. Hate in the Countertransference. The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. Hogarth Press, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Donald Winnicott. 1953. Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena- A study of the First Not- Me Possession. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34:89--97Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. www.familyrituals2-0.org.ukGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. www.designledexplorations.wordpress.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. www.conversationpiecesweb.wordpress.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing for Ambivalence: Mothers, Transitional Objects and Smartphones

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450346566
      DOI:10.1145/3027063

      Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 May 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '17 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader