skip to main content
10.1145/3027063.3053195acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

SynKin: A Game for Intentionally Synchronizing Biosignals

Published:06 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Inter-individual synchronization of motor activity, such as gestures, posture and speech rhythm during face-to-face interaction is a well-established phenomenon. Recent investigations have revealed that similar synchronization during interaction also occurs in brain activity and autonomous physiology. However, it is not known to what extent this synchronization emerges during computer-mediated interaction and whether its absence contributes to the widely acknowledged problems of online communication. We suggest that measuring the synchronization of biosignals is meaningful for assessing emotional capacity of computer-mediated communication systems, and intentionally increasing synchronization could improve understanding between people. As a proof-of-concept an interactive real-time system to quantify and visualize the synchronization of facial expressions, ECG, EEG and EDA of two players was piloted and results are presented in this paper.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

lbw0544p.mp4

mp4

4.1 MB

References

  1. M. Balaam, G. Fitzpatrick, J. Good, and E. Harris. 2011. Enhancing Interactional Synchrony with an Ambient Display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 867--876. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L.M. Carrier, A. Spradlin, J.P. Bunce, and L.D. Rosen. 2015. Virtual empathy: Positive and negative impacts of going online upon empathy in young adults. Computers in Human Behavior (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. X. Cui, D.M. Bryant, and A.L. Reiss. 2012. NIRSbased hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. NeuroImage 59, 3 (2012), 2430--2437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G. Dumas, J. Nadel, R. Soussignan, J. Martinerie, and L. Garnero. 2010. Inter-Brain Synchronization during Social Interaction. PLoS ONE 5, 8 (aug 2010), e12166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. Ekman and H. Oster. 1979. Facial expressions of emotion. Annual review of psychology (1979).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Engel, A.W. Woolley, L.X. Jing, and C.F. Chabris. 2014. Reading the mind in the eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face. PloS ONE (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M.J. Hove and J.L. Risen. 2009. It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J.H. Janssen, J.N. Bailenson, W.A. IJsselsteijn, and J.H.D.M. Westerink. 2010. Intimate heartbeats: Opportunities for affective communication technology. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 1, 2 (2010), 72-- 80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Kawasaki, Y. Yamada, Y. Ushiku, E. Miyauchi, and Y. Yamaguchi. 2013. Inter-brain synchronization during coordination of speech rhythm in human-to-human social interaction. Scientific Reports 3 (apr 2013), 849--850. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. I. Konvalinka and A. Roepstorff. 2012. The two-brain approach: how can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 (2012), 215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S.D. Kreibig, G. Schaefer, and T. Brosch. 2010. Psychophysiological response patterning in emotion: Implications for affective computing. A blueprint for affective computing (2010), 105--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Z. Néda, E. Ravasz, Y. Brechet, T. Vicsek, and A.-L. Barabási. 2000. Self-organizing processes: The sound of many hands clapping. Nature 403, 6772 (feb 2000), 849--850. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M.J. Richardson and K.L. Marsh. 2005. Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Slovák, J. Janssen, and G. Fitzpatrick. 2012. Understanding heart rate sharing: towards unpacking physiosocial space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, 859--868. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G.J. Stephens, L.J. Silbert, and U. Hasson. 2010. Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107, 32 (aug 2010), 14425--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. P. Valdesolo, J. Ouyang, and D. DeSteno. 2010. The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, 4 (2010), 693--695. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. B. Vickhoff, H. Malmgren, R. Åström, G. Nyberg, S.R. Ekström, M. Engwall, J Snygg, M. Nilsson, and R. Jörnsten. 2013. Music structure determines heart rate variability of singers. Frontiers in Psychology 4 (2013), 334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. Zaki and K.N. Ochsner. 2012. The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature neuroscience (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. SynKin: A Game for Intentionally Synchronizing Biosignals

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450346566
      DOI:10.1145/3027063

      Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 May 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '17 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader