skip to main content
10.1145/3027063.3053225acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Was I There?: Impact of Platform and Headphones on 360 Video Immersion

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtual reality industries claim that 360 videos are a powerful tool for creating empathy because they are an immersive medium, and wearing headphones is encouraged for the full immersive experience. To investigate these claims, we carried out a 2x2 between subjects lab study (n=40) to explore whether 360 viewing platform (magic window / google cardboard) and headphone use (with / without) have an effect on Film-Immersion for the 360 video Fire Rescue. Our results reveal a significant interaction effect: headphones increased immersion for google cardboard, but decreased immersion for magic window. However, not all dimensions of the immersive experience were affected. This suggests that head-mounted displays increase presence, but do not necessarily lead to more empathy and greater interest in the 360 video. Thematic analysis of interview data suggests contributing factors such as fear of missing out (FOMO). These findings have implications for film makers and researchers of 360 videos.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

lbw0636p.mp4

mp4

845.9 KB

References

  1. Ai Wei Wei 360. 2016. BBC Taster, Inside Story. Retrieved Feb 19, 2017 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/taster/projects/ai-weiwei-Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BBC Taster. Retrieved Feb 19, 2017 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/taster/categories/virtualreality/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lizzy Bleumers, Wendy Van den Broeck, Bram Lievens and Jo Pierson. 2012. Seeing the bigger picture: A user perspective on 360o TV. Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive TV and Video (EuroiTV'12), 115--124. doi>10.1145/2325616.2325640 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Calais 360. 2015. BBC Taster, Inside Story. Retrieved Feb 19, 2017 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/taster/projects/calaismigrants-vrGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheryl Campanella Bracken, Gary Pettey, Trupti Guha, and Bridget E. Rubenking. 2010. Sounding out small screens and telepresence. Journal of Media Psychology 22, 3: 125--137. http://doi.org/10.1027/1864--1105/a000017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fire Rescue 360. 2016. BBC Taster, Inside Story. Retrieved Feb 19, 2017 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/taster/projects/fire-rescue-Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Diana Fonseca and Martin Kraus. 2016. A comparison of head-mounted and hand-held displays for 360o videos with focus on attitude and behavior change. Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (AcademicMindtrek'16), 287--296. doi>10.1145/2994310.2994334 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jan Gugenheimer, Dennis Wolf, Gabriel Haas, Sebastien Krebs, and Enrico Rukzio. 2016. SwiVRChair: A motorized swivel chair to nudge users' orientation for 360 degree storytelling in virtual reality. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'16), 1996--2000. doi>10.1145/2858036.2858040 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jim Habig, 2016. Is 360 video worth it? Retrieved Feb 19, 2017 from https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/articles/360video-advertising.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Charlene Jennett, Anna L. Cox, Paul Cairns, Samira Dhoparee, Andrew Epps, Tim Tijs, and Alison Walton. 2008. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 9: 641661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sarah Jones. 2016. VRUK festival 2016 - A big talk from Sarah Jones, 360 Immersive Lab. Video. (Feb 29, 2016.) Retrieved Feb 19, 2017 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a17SmSG9XxkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kari Kallinen and Niklas Ravaja. 2007. Comparing speakers versus headphones in listening to news from a computer -- Individual differences and psychophysiological responses. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 1: 303--317. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.014 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Aaron Luber. 2016. What virtual reality will mean for advertising. Retrieved Feb 19, 2017 from https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/articles/virtualreality-advertising.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Luís A. R. Neng and Teresa Chambel. 2010. Get around 360° hypervideo. Proceedings of the 14th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek '10), 119--122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1930488.1930512 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. NYT VR. Retrieved Feb 19, 2017 from http://www.nytimes.com/marketing/nytvr/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Peter J. Passmore, Maxine Glancy, Adam Philpot, Amelia Roscoe, Andrew Wood, and Bob Fields. 2016. Effects of viewing condition on user experience of panoramic video. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence and Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments, 9--16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/egve.20161428Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nonny de la Peña. 2015. The future of news? Virtual reality. Video (May 2015). Retrieved Feb 19, 2017 from https://www.ted.com/talks/nonny_de_la_pena_the _future_of_news_virtual_reality?language=en#t-Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nonny De La Peña, Peggy Weil, Joan Llobera, Elias Giannopoulos, Ausias Pomes, Bernhard Spanlang, Doron Friedman, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives, and Mel Slater. 2010. Immersive journalism: Immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19, 4: 291--301. http://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jacob Rigby, Duncan Brumby, Anna Cox, and Sandy Gould. Under review. Development of the Immersive Experience Questionnaire for Film and Television.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alia Sheikh, Andy Brown, Zillah Watson, and Michael Evans. 2016. Directing attention in 360degree video. Proceedings of IBC 2016, 29. doi>10.1049/ibc.2016.0029 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Was I There?: Impact of Platform and Headphones on 360 Video Immersion

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450346566
      DOI:10.1145/3027063

      Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 May 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '17 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader