skip to main content
10.1145/3027385.3029424acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

LA policy: developing an institutional policy for learning analytics using the RAPID outcome mapping approach

Published:13 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This workshop aims to promote strategic planning for learning analytics in higher education through developing institutional policies. While adoption of learning analytics is predominantly seen in small-scale and bottom-up patterns, it is believed that a systemic implementation can bring the widest impact to the education system and lasting benefits to learners. However, the success of it highly depends on the adopted strategy that meets the needs of various stakeholders and systematically pushes the institution towards achieving its targets. It is imperative to develop a learning analytics policy that ensures a practice that is valid, effective and ethical.

The workshop involves two components. The first component includes a set of presentations about the state of learning analytics in higher education, drawing on results from an Australian and a European project examining institutional learning analytics policy and adoption processes. The second component is an interactive session where participants are encouraged to share their motivations for adopting learning analytics and the diversity of challenges they perceive impede analytics adoption in their institution. Using the RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach (ROMA), participants will create a draft policy that articulates how the various challenges can be addressed. This workshop aims to further develop our understanding of how learning analytics operates in an organizational system and promote a cultural change in how such analytics are adopted in higher education.

References

  1. Colvin, C., Rogers, T., Wade, A., Dawson, S., Gasevic, D., Shum, S.B., Nelson, K., Alexander, S., Lockyer, L., Kennedy, G., Corrin, L. and Fisher, J. 2015. Student retention and learning analytics: a snapshot of Australian practices and a framework for advancement. The Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ferguson, R., Macfadyen, L.P., Clow, D., Tynan, B., Alexander, S. and Dawson, S. 2014. Setting Learning Analytics in Context: Overcoming the Barriers to Large- Scale Adoption. Journal of Learning Analytics. 1, 3 (Sep. 2014), 120--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T. and Gasevic, D. 2016. Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and Higher Education. 28, (2016), 68--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Macfadyen, L.P., Dawson, S., Pardo, A. and Gaševic, D. 2014. Embracing Big Data in Complex Educational Systems: The Learning Analytics Imperative and the Policy Challenge. Research & Practice in Assessment. 9, (2014), 17--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Newland, B., Martin, L. and Ringan, N. 2015. Learning analytics in UK HE 2015: a HeLF survey report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Siemens, G., Dawson, S. and Lynch, G. 2013. Improving the quality and productivity of the higher education sector: policy and strategy for systems-level deployment of learning analytics. Society for Learning Analytics Research for the Australian Office for Learning and Teaching.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Young, J. and Mendizabal, E. 2009. Helping researchers become policy entrepreneurs - how to develop engagement strategies for evidence-based policy-making. Overseas Development Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. LA policy: developing an institutional policy for learning analytics using the RAPID outcome mapping approach

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        LAK '17: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference
        March 2017
        631 pages
        ISBN:9781450348706
        DOI:10.1145/3027385

        Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 March 2017

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        LAK '17 Paper Acceptance Rate36of114submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader