skip to main content
10.1145/3033701.3033705acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Awareness elements on collaborative online editors from the perspective of people with visual impairment

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article discusses the limits and possibilities of interaction blind users with collaborative text editors on the Web. It is characterized as a qualitative, exploratory/explanatory research, whose object of study is the implementation of live regions, accessibility tool that operates as a condition of possibility for interaction and positive interdependence among blind users and collaborative Web applications. Based on the sociocultural context of affirmation of difference and space-time of cooperation established by Web 2.0, conceptually grounded in the research area of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, this research discusses the potential for cooperation and individual and collective authorship of Groupware tools when interacting with individuals visually impaired. The results of the experiments showed a weakness about the availability of awareness elements targeted to people with visual impairment, including, lack of user identification features in synchronous and asynchronous action and absence of feedback strategies for awareness and among participants.

References

  1. Pedro Antunes, Valeria Herskovic, Sergio F. Ochoa, and José A. Pino. 2014. Reviewing the quality of awareness support in collaborative applications. Journal of Systems and Software 89: 146--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ben Caldwell, Michael Cooper, Loretta Guarino Reid., and Gregg Vanderheiden. 2008. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Retrieved April 24, 2016 from http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. E. Castellano and R. S. Montoya. 2011. Laptop, andamiaje para la Educación Especial: guía práctica, computadoras móviles en el currículo. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. António Damásio. 2012. O Erro de Descartes. Companhia das Letras.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Joanmarie Diggs, James Craig, Shane McCarron, and Michael Cooper. 2016. Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.1. Retrieved April 24, 2016 from http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alan Dix, Tom Rodden, Nigel Davies, Adrian Friday, and Kevin Palfreyman. 2000. Exploiting Space and Location as a Design Framework for Interactive Mobile Systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7, 3: 285--321. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Paul Dourish. 2006. Re-space-ing place. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '06, ACM Press, 299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mica R. Endsley. 1995. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37, 1: 32--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Antonio Carlos Gil. 2008. Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. Atlas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Carl Gutwin and Saul Greenberg. 1999. The effects of workspace awareness support on the usability of real-time distributed groupware. Interactions 7, 4: 9--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Menga Lüdke and Marli E.D.A. André. 2013. Pesquisa em Educação: Abordagens Qualitativas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Alan M. MacEachren. 2005. Moving Geovisualization toward Support for Group Work. In Exploring Geovisualization. Elsevier, 445--461.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alexandre Moeckel. 2003. CSCW: conceitos e aplicações para cooperação. Curitiba.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Roque Moraes. 2003. Uma tempestade de luz: a com-preensão possibilitada pela análise textual discursiva. Retrieved April 24, 2016 from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ciedu/v9n2/04.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Giulio Mori, Maria Claudia Buzzi, Marina Buzzi, Barbara Leporini, and M R Victor. 2011. Collaborative Editing for All: the Google Docs Example Accessibility and usability of Google Docs Collaborative Features. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jean Piaget. 1973. Estudos Sociológicos. Forense.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mariano Pimentel and Hugo Fuks. 2011. Sistemas Colaborativos. Elsevier Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Rajan, S. D. Craig, B. Gholson, N. K. Person, and A. C. Graesser. 2001. AutoTutor: Incorporating back-channel feedback and other human-like conversational behaviors into an intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Speech Technology 4, 2: 117--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lucila Santarosa, Débora Conforto, and Rodrigo Prestes Machado. 2014. Whiteboard: Synchronism, accessibility, protagonism and collective authorship for human diversity on Web 2.0. Computers in Human Behavior 31, 1: 591--601. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. P. Thiessen and C. Chen. 2007. Ajax live regions: ReefChat using the fire vox screen reader as a case example. Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A): 137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tim O'Reilly. 2005. What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Retrieved April 23, 2016 from http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Alain Touraine. 2009. Pensar Outramente. O Discurso Interpretativo Dominante. Vozes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. R Vertegaal, I Weevers, C Sohn, and C Cheung. 2003. GAZE-2: Conveying Eye Contact in Group Video Conferencing Using Eye-Controlled Camera Direction. Chi 2003, 5: 521--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IHC '16: Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    October 2016
    431 pages
    ISBN:9781450352352
    DOI:10.1145/3033701

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 October 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    IHC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate58of158submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader