skip to main content
10.1145/3033701.3033723acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research trends in HCI in Brazil: An Analysis in Relation to the GranDIHC-Br

Published: 04 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In 2012 the research seniors of the Brazilian HCI community compiled the document "GRANDIHC-Br -- Great Research Challenges in Human-Computer Interaction in Brazil", highlighting what the local HCI community recognizes as the areas Brazilians researchers should explore. GRANDIHC-Br presents five major research challenges for the period of 2012 to 2022. Aiming to verify how the local HCI community have been embracing such challenges, we present a statistical analysis considering the challenges, the annual Brazilian HCI Symposium topics of interest, and the keywords on the accepted papers from 2013 until 2015. The results show that there is still a feeble connection between the challenges and the Brazilian HCI research topics. From our analysis we point out the need for an update on the topics of interest for the HCI national Symposium, we believe as necessary to stimuli the Brazilian HCI community to face such challenges for the current decade.

References

[1]
Ata da II Assembleia da Comissão Especial de Interação Humano-Computador da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação. Relatório Técnico. Acesso em: 08 de Maio, 2016. http://comissoes.sbc.org.br/ceihc/documentos/ataihc2001.htm
[2]
Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Website. Acesso em: 08 de Maio, 2016. http://dl.acm.org/event.cfm?id=RE449
[3]
Renata Aquino. 2016. Pesquisa em IHC. Acesso em: 13 de Maio, 2016. http://noticias.universia.com.br/destaque/noticia/2004/11/25/494507/pesquisa-em-hci.html
[4]
Maria Cecília C. Baranauskas, Clarisse S. de Souza, and Roberto Pereira. 2014. I GranDIHC-Br -- Grandes Desafios de Pesquisa em Interação Humano-Computador no Brasil. Relatório Técnico. Comissão Especial de Interação Humano-Computador (CEIHC) da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC), 27--30.
[5]
Scott Bateman, Carl Gutwin, and Miguel Nacenta. 2008. Seeing things in the clouds: the effect of visual features on tag cloud selections. In Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia (HT '08). ACM,New York, USA, 193--202.
[6]
Alberto J. Cañas, Greg Hill, Roger Carff, Niranjan Suri, James Lott, Gloria Gómez. 2004. Cmaptools. Acesso em: 14 de Abril, 2016. http://cmap.ihmc.us.
[7]
Capes. 2016. Qualis. Acesso em: 17 de Maio, 2016. http://www.capes.gov.br/acessoainformacao/perguntas-frequentes/avaliacao-da-pos-graduacao/7422-qualis
[8]
Stuart K. Card, Thomas P. Moran. 1980. The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. ACM, 7 (July 1980), 396--410.
[9]
Maria da Graça Brasil Rocha, Maria do Carmo Nicoletti, Sandra C. P. F. Fabbri, Edna Barros, and Alejandro C. Frery. 2005. Currículo de Referência da SBC para Cursos de Graduação em Bacharelado em Ciência da Computação e Engenharia de Computação. Relatório Técnico. Acesso em: 08 de Maio, 2016. http:/bcc.ime.usp.br/principal/documentos/sbc2005.pdf
[10]
Clarisse S. de Souza. 2006. Da importância dos Simpósios Brasileiros de Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais. Relatório Técnico. Acesso em: 08 de Maio, 2016. http://comissoes.sbc.org.br/ceihc/documentos/da-importancia-dos-IHCs_2006.html
[11]
Clarisse S. de Souza, M. Cecilia C. Baranauskas, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Marcelo S. Pimenta. 2008. HCI in Brazil: lessons learned and new perspectives. In Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '08). Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Brazil, 358--359.
[12]
Jonathan Feinberg. 2016. Wordle. Acesso em: 17 de Maio, 2016. www.wordle.net
[13]
Joseph L. Fleiss. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychologic B.,378--382.
[14]
Isabela Gasparini, Marcos H. Kimura, and Marcelo S. Pimenta. 2013. Visualizando 15 anos de IHC. In Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '13). Brazilian Computer Society, Brazil, 238--247.
[15]
Matthew Graham, Anthony Milanowski, and Jackson M. 2012.Measuring and promoting inter-rater agreement of teacher & principal performance ratings.
[16]
Fakhreddine Karray, Milad Alemzadeh, Jamil Abou Saleh. 2008. Human-Computer Interaction: Overview on State of the Art. In International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems 1, 1, 137--159.
[17]
J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. In Biometrics 33, 1, 159--174.
[18]
Yong Liu, Jorge Goncalves, Denzil Ferreira, Bei Xiao, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2014. CHI 1994-2013: mapping two decades of intellectual progress through co-word analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, USA, 3553--3562.
[19]
Stefano Padilla, Thomas S. Methven, David W. Corne, and Mike J. Chantler. 2014. Hot topics in CHI: trend maps for visualising research. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 815--824.
[20]
Raquel O. Prates, and Lucia V. L. Filgueiras. 2011. Usability inBrazil.In Global Usability. Springer, 91--109.
[21]
Anna W. Rivadeneira, Daniel M. Gruen, Michael J. Muller, and David R. Millen. 2007. Getting our head in the clouds: toward evaluation studies of tagclouds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 995--998.
[22]
SBC. 2006. Grandes Desafios da Pesquisa em Computação no Brasil (2006-2016). Relatório Técnico. Acesso em: 08 de Maio, 2016. http://www.gta.ufrj.br/rebu/arquivos/SBC-Grandes.pdf
[23]
SBC. 2012. I GranDIHC-BR --- Grandes Desafios de Pesquisa em Interação Humano-Computador no Brasil. Relatório Técnico. Acesso em: 07 de Abril, 2016. http://comissoes.sbc.org.br/ceihc/documentos/RT_GranDIHC_BR_2012.pdf.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)EthicsProceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3472301.3484324(1-12)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Not the Same Everywhere: Comparing the Scope and Definition of User Experience between the Brazilian and International CommunitiesInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.196072738:7(595-613)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2021
  • (2021)Appropriation for Interdisciplinary Practice: The Case of Participatory Design in Brazilian Computer ScienceCulture and Computing. Design Thinking and Cultural Computing10.1007/978-3-030-77431-8_23(363-386)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Research trends in HCI in Brazil: An Analysis in Relation to the GranDIHC-Br

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IHC '16: Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    October 2016
    431 pages
    ISBN:9781450352352
    DOI:10.1145/3033701
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 October 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Brazilian HCI challenges
    2. GranDIHC-BR
    3. HCI topics
    4. IHC Brasil

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    IHC '16

    Acceptance Rates

    IHC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 58 of 158 submissions, 37%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 331 of 973 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)EthicsProceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3472301.3484324(1-12)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
    • (2021)Not the Same Everywhere: Comparing the Scope and Definition of User Experience between the Brazilian and International CommunitiesInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.196072738:7(595-613)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2021
    • (2021)Appropriation for Interdisciplinary Practice: The Case of Participatory Design in Brazilian Computer ScienceCulture and Computing. Design Thinking and Cultural Computing10.1007/978-3-030-77431-8_23(363-386)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
    • (2019)A survey on the awareness of brazilian web development community about cognitive accessibilityProceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3357155.3358448(1-11)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2019
    • (2018)PrivacyProceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3274192.3274226(1-8)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2018
    • (2018)Mobile-PrivAccess: Method for Analyzing Accessibility in Mobile Applications from the Privacy Viewpoint Abiding by W3CUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Methods, Technologies, and Users10.1007/978-3-319-92049-8_2(18-37)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2018
    • (2017)Activity of Brazilian HCI Community from 2012 to 2017 in the Context of the Challenge 'Future, Smart Cities, and Sustainability'Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3160504.3160562(1-5)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2017

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media