skip to main content
10.1145/3036331.3036341acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Simulator for Simulating and Monitoring the Hypotensive Patients Blood Pressure Response of Phenylephrine Bolus Injection and Infusion with Open-loop and Closed-loop Treatment

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 January 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we introduce a model-based simulator for hypotensive patients' blood pressure response to vasopressor drug phenylephrine (PHP) delivery. The simulator is designed based on a model of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to PHP infusion. The model is data-driven learning model which is illustrated to be adequately describing inter - and intra patients' response to PHP. In the simulator, besides open loop operation, such as manual PHP bolus injection and continuous infusion, a closed-loop control module is also designed, including an anti-windup PI controller, an adaptive controller and an empirical controller, to regulate the blood pressure at target level and maintain hemodynamic stability in hypotensive patients. In addition, three frequent scenarios happened in clinical treatment are modeled in challenge module. They are sodium nitroprusside (SNP) treatment, baseline pressure drop and hemorrhage. The simulator can be operated with two different interfaces; one is the MPA trend response interface and the other is real-time monitoring interface. The real-time monitoring is real-time synchronization presenting blood pressure waves, heart rate and EtCO2 waves under open and closed-loop treatment. The simulator is capable to train the doctors on the dose of PHP usage for the hypotensive patients with different challenges during the treatment.

References

  1. L. Flancbaum, M. Dick, J. Dasta, R. Sinha, and P. Choban, A Dose- response Study of Phenylephrine in Critically Ill, Septic Surgical Pa- tients, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 51, pp. 461--465, 1997. Ding, W. and Marchionini, G. 1997. A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. Technical Report. University of Maryland at College Park.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. A. Ortiz and J. L. Garvin, Intrarenal Transport and Vasoactive Substances in Hypertension, Hypertension, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 621--624, 2001. Tavel, P. 2007. Modeling and Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd., Natick, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. B. Slate, L. C. Sheppard, V. C. Rideout, and E. H. Blackstone, A model for design of blood pressure controller for hypertensive patients, in Proc. IEEE Front. Eng. Health Care, pp. 285--289, 1979. Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289--1305. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. R. Craig and R. E. Stitzel, Modern Pharmacology with Clinical Applications, Lippincott Williams Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. M. Bailey and M. M. Haddad, Drug Dosing Control in Clinical Pharmacology, IEEE control Syst., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 35--51, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Luspay and K. Grigoriadis, Adaptive Parameter Estimation of Blood Pressure Dynamics Subject to Vasoactive Drug Infusion, IEEE Trans- action on Control Systems Technology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 779--787, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. L. Hester, A. J. Brown, L. Husband, R. IIiescu, D. Pruett, R. Sum- mers, and T. G. Coleman, HumMod: A Modeling Environment for the SimulationofIntegrativeHumanPhysiology,FrontiersinPhysiology, 2:12--12, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. A. Beard, Modeling of Oxygen Transport and Cellular Energetics Explains Observations on in Vivo Cardiac Energy Metabolism, PLOS Comput. Biol, 2, e107, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. T. W. Secomb, B. Styp-Rekowska, and A. R. Pries, Two-dimensional Simulation of Red Blood Cell Deformation and Lateral Migration in Mcrovessels, Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 35, pp. 755--765, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. C. Guyton and T. G. Coleman, Quantitative analysis of the Patho- physiology of Hypertension, Circ. Res., vol. 24, pp. 1--9, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. C. Guyton, T. G. Coleman, and H.J. Granger, Circulation: Overall Regulation, Annu. Rev. Physiol., vol. 34, pp. 13 --46, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Hahn, T. Edison and T. F. Edgar, Adaptive IMC Control for Drug Infusion for Biological Systems, Control Engineering Practice, vol. 10, pp. 45--56, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Isaka and A. V. Sebald, Control Strategies ofr Arterial Blood Pressure Regulation, IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 353--363, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. M. Ansparger, B. C. McInnis, J. R. Glover and An. A. Normann, Adaptive Control of Blood Pressure, IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineer-ing, Vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 168 --176, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. H. Kaufman, R. Roy and X. Xu, Model Reference Adaptive Control of Drug Infusion Rate, Automatica, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 205--209, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. Wassar, etc., Automatic Control of Arterial Pressure for Hypotensive Patients using Phenylephrine, International Journal of Modeling and Simulation, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 187--198, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. W. D. Ngan Kee, ect., Randomized Double-blinded Comparison of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine for Maintenance of Blood Pressure during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery, Anesthesiology, vol. 122, no. 4, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. W. D. Nagan Kee, ect., Randomized Comparison of Closed-loop Feed- back Computer-controlled with manual-controlled Infusion of Phenyle- phrine for Maintaining Arterial Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Delivery, British Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 59--65, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCMS '17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation
    January 2017
    207 pages
    ISBN:9781450348164
    DOI:10.1145/3036331

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 20 January 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader