skip to main content
research-article

A case study to develop a graduate-level degree program in embedded & cyber-physical systems

Published:05 January 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

University of California Irvine is developing an interdisciplinary graduate-level Masters degree in Embedded & Cyber-Physical Systems (MECPS) that will be managed by the Center for Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems (CECS). In this paper, we present this case study and highlight our systematic approach to creating this MS degree program based on the demand from the students and the industries. As part of our methodology, a survey was conducted among applicants and current MS students in both Electrical Engineering and Computer Science disciplines. Moreover, a market study was performed by the University Extension to estimate the CPS-related job market in the United States of America.

References

  1. Sang C. Suh et. al (eds.). Applied Cyber-Physical Systems. Springer, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Transparencymarketresearch. http://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/embedded-system.html., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Edward A Lee. Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), 11th IEEE International Symposium on, pages 363--369, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. NSF. Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS). http://www.nsf.gov., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DARPA. Adaptive Vehicle Make (AVM) Program. http://www.darpa.mil., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. NIST. Foundations for innovation: Strategic R&D opportunities for the 21st century cyber-physical systems - connecting computer and information systems with the physical world. Technical report, NIST, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rajesh Gupta. Programming models and methods for spatiotemporal actions and reasoning in cyber-physical systems. NSF Workshop on CPS, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Paulo Tabuada. Cyber-physical systems: Position paper. NSF Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ragunathan Raj Rajkumar, Insup Lee, Lui Sha, and John Stankovic. Cyber-physical systems: the next computing revolution. Proceedings of the 47th Design Automation Conference, pages 731--736, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gabor Karsai and Janos Sztipanovits. Model-integrated development of cyber-physical systems. pages 46--54. Springer, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeff C Jensen, Danica H Chang, and Edward A Lee. A model-based design methodology for cyber-physical systems. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), 2011 7th International, pages 1666--1671, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gabor Simko, Tihamer Levendovszky, Miklos Maroti, and Janos Sztipanovits. Towards a theory for cyber-physical systems modeling. Proc. 3rd Workshop on Design, Modeling and Evaluation of Cyber Physical Systems (CyPhy 2013), Philadelphia, USA, April, pages 08--11, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Peter Marwedel. Embedded system design: Embedded systems foundations of cyber-physical systems. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Edward Ashford Lee and Sanjit Arunkumar Seshia. Introduction to embedded systems: A cyber-physical systems approach. Lee & Seshia, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Arquimedes Canedo, Eric Schwarzenbach, and Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque. Context-sensitive synthesis of executable functional models of cyber-physical systems. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), pages 99--108, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Janos Sztipanovits, Xenofon Koutsoukos, Gabor Karsai, Nicholas Kottenstette, Panos Antsaklis, Vijay Gupta, Bill Goodwine, John Baras, and Shige Wang. Toward a science of cyber-physical system integration. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(1):29--44, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Arquimedes Canedo, Jiang Wan, and Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque. Functional modeling compiler for system-level design of automotive cyber-physical systems. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), pages 39--46, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Lui Sha, Sathish Gopalakrishnan, Xue Liu, and Qixin Wang. Cyber-physical systems: A new frontier. pages 3--13. Springer, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. EMBEDDED COMPUTING. Cyber-physical systems. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Radhakisan Baheti and Helen Gill. Cyber-physical systems. The impact of control technology, pages 161--166, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque and Fereidoun Ahourai. A model-based design of cyber-physical energy systems. In 2014 19th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. NIST. http://www.nist.gov/el/isd/cps-020613.cfm., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Whitehouse. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-nitrd-report-2010.pdf., 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. CPS-VO. http://cps-vo.org/., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Center for Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems (CECS). http://www.cecs.uci.edu/., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. CISCO Corp. http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoE_Economy.pdf., 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Freescale Corp. and ARM Corp. http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/white_paper/INTOTHNGSWP.pdf., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. GE Corp. http://www.ge.com/docs/chapters/Industrial_Internet.pdf., 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Goldman-Sachs Equity Research. http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/outlook/internet-of-things/iot-report.pdf., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Dorsa Sadigh, Sanjit A Seshia, and Mona Gupta. Automating exercise generation: A step towards meeting the MOOC challenge for embedded systems. Proceedings of the Workshop on Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems Education, page 2, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerstin Bauer and Klaus Schneider. Teaching cyber-physical systems: A programming approach. Proceedings of the Workshop on Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems Education, page 3, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Walid Taha, Robert Cartwright, Roland Philippsen, and Yingfu Zeng. A First Course on Cyber Physical Systems. Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems Education (CPS-Ed), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. E Atkins and J Bradley. Aerospace Cyber-Physical Systems Education. AIAA Infotech@ Aerospace, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Aniruddha Gokhale, Gautam Biswas, Nilanjan Sarkar, Shivakumar Sastry, and MS Branicky. CPS-Laboratory-as-a-Service: Enabling technology for readily accessible and scalable CPS education. First Workshop on Cyber Physical Systems Education, CPSWeek, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Edward A Lee, Sanjit A Seshia, and Jeff C Jensen. Teaching embedded systems the Berkeley way. Proceedings of the Workshop on Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems Education, page 1, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Steffen Peter, Frank Vahid, Daniel D Gajski, and Tony Givargis. A Ball Goes to School-Our Experiences from a CPS Design Experiment. 1st Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems Education (CPS-Ed), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A case study to develop a graduate-level degree program in embedded & cyber-physical systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader