skip to main content
10.1145/3041021.3054145acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Inferring the Student Social Loafing State in Collaborative Learning with a Hidden Markov Model: A Case on Slack

Published:03 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the increasingly prevailing usage of Information and Communication technologies (ICT) in collaborative learning, students can cooperate with others online easily, in spite of the restriction of time and location. Social loafing, a common phenomenon in collaborative work, has negative effect on team performance, especially on the individual's knowledge sharing behavior. In recent years, there are also some researches pointing out that social loafing is a kind of hidden and unobservable behavior. In this study, we propose a research model based on the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) framework and build a hidden Markov model (HMM) to infer the student's unobservable social loafing state. We collect real world behavior data from an online collaborative course from Nov 11th 2016 to Dec 21th 2016.The dataset includes more than 1200 knowledge sharing records from 150 students on Slack. Our research is expected to contribute in both academic study and managerial implications on how to set up a collaborative team.

References

  1. Baloian, N., J.A. Pino, and U.H. Hoppe, Dealing with the Students' Attention Problem in Computer Supported Face-to-Face Lecturing. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2008. 11(2): p. 192--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonacich, P. 1972. "Factoring and Weighting Approaches to Status Scores and Clique Identification," Journal of Mathematical Sociology (2), pp. 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bououd, I., Rouis, S., & Boughzala, I. (2013). Social loafing impact on collaboration in 3d virtual worlds: an empirical study. Post-Print.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bukowitz, W. R., & Williams, R. L. (1999). The knowledge management field book. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Financial Times (FT) Press, Prentice HallGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chidambaram, L., and Tung, L.L. "Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups," Information Systems Research (16:2) 2005, pp 149--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ding, W. 2003. A Study of Collaborative Scientific Discovery. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dissanayake, I., Zhang, J., & Gu, B. (2015, January). Virtual Team Performance in Crowdsourcing Contest: A Social Network Perspective. In System Sciences (HICSS),In the 48th Hawaii International Conference (pp. 4894--4897). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Donovan, R. J. and J. R. Rossiter. 1982. Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 58 (1), 34--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeman, L. 1979. "Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification," Social Networks (1), pp. 215--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. George, J. "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations," Academy of Management Journal (35:1) 1992, pp 191--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Karau, S.J., and Williams, K.D. "Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (65:4) 1993, pp 681--706Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., Jaworski, R.A., and Bennett, N. "Social Loafing: A Field Investigation," Journal of Management (30:2) 2004, pp 285--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lin, B., Zagalsky, A., Storey, Margaret, Anne, & Serebrenik, A. (2016). Why Developers Are Slacking Off: Understanding How Software Teams Use Slack. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (pp.333--336). ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lin, T.C., and Huang, C.C. "Understanding Social Loafing in Knowledge Contribution from the Perspective of Justice and Trust," Expert Systems with Applications (36:1) 2009, pp 6156--6163 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Marques, Cardoso, D. V., Zappalá, L., & Salvatore. (2008). Knowledge sharing networks and performance. Comportamento Organizational E Gesto, 14(2)161--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mehrabian, A. and J. A. Russell. 1974. An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. iezon, S. L., & Donaldson, R. L. (2005). Online groups and social loafing: understanding student-group interactions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Suleiman, J., and Watson, R.T. 2008. "Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams," Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (17:4), pp. 291--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tapscott, D., Grown up digital. 2009: New York: McGraw-Hill. 361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Voelpel, S.C. "David against Goliath? Group Size and Bystander Effects in Virtual Knowledge Sharing," Human Relations (61:2) 2008, pp 271--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Voyles, E. C., Bailey, S. F., & Durik, A. M. (2015). New Pieces of the Jigsaw Classroom: Increasing Accountability to Reduce Social Loafing in Student Group Projects. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 13(1), 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Wasko, M.M., and Faraj, S. 2005. "Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice," MIS Quarterly (29:1), pp. 35--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Zhi, W. H., Chang, T. T., Kankanhalli, A., Zhi, W. H., & Chang, T. T. (2010). The Impact of Individual Centrality and Helping on Knowledge Sharing: A Study of Fit. Sustainable It Collaboration Around the Globe. Americas Conference on Information Systems, Amcis 2010, Lima, Peru, August (pp.149).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Inferring the Student Social Loafing State in Collaborative Learning with a Hidden Markov Model: A Case on Slack

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader