skip to main content
10.1145/3047273.3047311acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Government Effectiveness

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

All over the world, e-government initiatives try to combine Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) to improve delivery of government services to their stakeholders. Government is being asked to provide public services in more efficient and accountable ways with high quality. Much attention has been focused on the processes, procedures, public and civil services, the policy making processes and their implementation. However, several surveys are reporting that ICT has a positive impact on government by automating the processes and reducing the cost and increasing time efficiency, etc., they are limited in case studies. While many studies have provided valuable facts about the role of ICT in government, there remains a strong need for studies with quantitative methods that can help to determine ICT's position toward government effectiveness, which, according to World Bank captures the perception of the quality of public and civil services, the quality of policy formulation and implementation. This study attempts to explore and analyze the effect of ICT development on government effectiveness by engaging four statistical tests: Fisher-exact test, Chi-squared test, Likelihood test and F-test in on ICT data provided by the International Telecommunication Unit and government effectiveness data provided by World Bank.

References

  1. Bob Jessop. The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development. International social science journal, 50(155):29--45, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sakiko Fukuda-Parr and Richard Ponzio. Governance: Past, present, future setting the governance agenda for the millennium declaration. New York: United Nations Development Program, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Melissa A Thomas. What do the worldwide governance indicators measure? The European Journal of Development Research, 22(1):31--54, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Fara Azmat and Ken Coghill. Good governance and market-based reforms: A study of bangladesh. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(4):625--638, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Brian Clive Smith. Good governance and development. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. Governance matters viii: aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996--2008. World bank policy research working paper, (4978), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, and Pablo Zoido-Lobatón. Governance matters. Finance Dev, 37(2):10, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Meetika Srivastava. Good governance-concept, meaning and features: A detailed study. Meaning andGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Features: A Detailed Study (December 26, 2009), 2009. Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(02):220--246, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. United Nations. Department of Economic. United Nations E-government Survey 2010: Leveraging E-government at a Time of Financial and Economic Crisis, volume 2. United Nations Publications, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Radha Krishna Rao and Radha Krishna. E--governance gaining in popularity. Kurukhetra, 9:12, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sharon S Dawes. The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance. Public Administration Review, 68(s1): S86--S102, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. David Osborn, Ted Gaebler, and Thomas R Holman. Reinventing government, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hany A Abdelghaffar Ismail. Citizens' readiness for e-government in developing countries. PhD thesis, Middlesex University, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Subhash Bhatnagar. Administrative corruption: How does e-government help? Ahmedabad, India: Indian Institute of Management, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Marco T Bastos, Dan Mercea, and Arthur Charpentier. Tents, tweets, and events: The interplay between ongoing protests and social media. Journal of Communication, 65(2):320--350, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Damoder N Gujarati. Basic econometrics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Carlos Santiso, Jorge von Horoch, and Juan Cruz Vieyra. Improving lives through better government: Promoting effective, efficient, and open governments in latin america and the caribbean. Technical report, Inter-American Development Bank, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Patrick Dunleavy and Leandro Carrera. Growing the productivity of government services. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. David Gichoya. Factors affecting the successful implementation of ict projects in government. the Electronic Journal of e-government, 3(4):175--184, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M Aineruhanga. Focus on the'kenya ict week'. Chakula Newsletter, 9, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Richard Heeks. Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The information society, 18(2):101--112, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Richard Heeks et al. Most egovernment-for-development projects fail: how can risks be reduced?, volume 14. Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester Manchester, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Government Effectiveness

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      March 2017
      657 pages
      ISBN:9781450348256
      DOI:10.1145/3047273

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 March 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader