skip to main content
10.1145/3050385.3050386acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesergo-iaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Where do misleading schemes of operators in industry come from?: an exploratory study in a microworld simulating a real aeronautical factory

Published:06 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The study presented here follows a former study, lead in a real aeronautical factory where operators control a semi-automated process of metallic frames stretching. The observations and interviews from this first study conducted to the identification of a misleading scheme. This misleading scheme consists in programming a stretching machine according to the results obtained on a precedent frame instead of using the inner frame characteristics. However, since studying this misleading scheme turned out to be complicated in the real factory, a micro-world, reproducing the factory activity was developed. This new article present the results obtained on this micro-world. First, the activity of twelve participants, who had never worked in the factory, was similar to the operator activity as they used the misleading scheme. Moreover, the micro-world showed that the misleading scheme brings a decrease in the performance of participants who were given more time on the micro-world. On the contrary, participant with little training always performed badly, whenever they used the misleading scheme or not. The results showed that the micro-world granted the access to a specific cognitive criterion, the misleading scheme, which was not easily accessible in the real factory. This results lead to two main recommendations: the first one states the importance to give the operator inhibition training against the misleading scheme; the second is with regard to the features an interface helping with the fabrication process should have.

References

  1. M. Hoarau, C. Charron, and F. Mars, "Activity Analysis of Expert and Novice Operators in a Semi-Automated Manufacturing Process," in Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, 2014, p. 19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Vergnaud, "La théorie des champs conceptuels," Rech. En Didact. Mathématiques, vol. 10, no. 2.3, pp. 133--169, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Pascual-Leone, J. Johnson, and A. Agostino, "Mental Attention, Multiplicative Structures, and the Causal Problems of Cognitive Development," in The Developmental Relations among Mind, Brain and Education, M. Ferrari and L. Vuletic, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010, pp. 49--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Moutier, N. Angeard, and O. Houdé, "Deductive reasoning and matching-bias inhibition training: Evidence from a debiasing paradigm (English)," Think Reason, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 205--224, cover date 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. K. B. Bennett and J. Flach, Display and interface design: subtle science, exact art. Boca Raton; London: CRC Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Hilliard, "Applying Work Domain Analysis to Scope Micro-or Scaled World Simulator Design: A Petrochemical Domain Case Study.," in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2012, vol. 56, pp. 378--382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J.-M. Hoc and R. Amalberti, "Cognitive control dynamics for reaching a satisficing performance in complex dynamic situations," J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 22--55, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Pascual-Leone and R. R. Irwin, "Noncognitive factors in high-road/low-road learning: I. Modes of abstraction in adulthood," J. Adult Dev., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73--89, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Rasmussen, "Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models," Syst. Man Cybern. IEEE Trans. On, no. 3, pp. 257--266, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. M. Flach, F. Tanabe, K. Monta, K. J. Vicente, and J. Rasmussen, "An ecological approach to interface design," in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1998, vol. 42, pp. 295--299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    Ergo'IA '16: Proceedings of the 15th Ergo'IA "Ergonomie Et Informatique Avancée" Conference
    July 2016
    163 pages
    ISBN:9781450347853
    DOI:10.1145/3050385

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 6 July 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader