Daniel Hauret
ABSTRACT
According to the HSI design processes, we adapted the method of simulation of the activity on tangible support and included a sample of Rafale fighter pilots currently engaged in war operations. Our objective was not to design a new HSI but to formalize the collection of information determining the activity of targeting and weapon delivering in order to frame its ergonomic display in the HSI. On purpose, we developed a tangible supports system with Rafale models as multi-ability avatars in a tangible environment similar to a battlefield. We added a second support to allow pilots to locate their informational needs on a virtual but tangible interface. Verbalizations and sketches of these end users are analyzed and compared in a second time to eyetracking data recorded from a Rafale flight simulator during the achievement of the same missions than those previously carried out on the tangible supports system.
- Amalberti, R. La conduite des systèmes à risques. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France (1996).Google Scholar
- Arleo, A. & Rondi-Reig, L. Multimodal sensory integration and concurrent navigation strategies for spatial cognition in real and artificial organisms. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 6, Imperial College Press (2007), 327--366.Google Scholar
- Bastien, J. M. C., & Scapin, D. L. Evaluating a user interface with ergonomics criteria. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, (1995), 7, 105--121. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barcellini, F., Van Belleghem, L. & Daniellou, F. Les projets de conception comme opportunité de développement des activités. In Falzon, P. (coord.) Ergonomie constructive. Presses Universitaires de France (2013), 191--206.Google Scholar
- Béguin, P. & Weill-Fassina, A. (Eds) La simulation en ergonomie: connaître, agir et interagir. Octarès. (1997).Google Scholar
- Bourgy, M. L'adaptation cognitive et l'improvisation dans les environnements dynamiques : pour une intégration de l'expérience sensible dans les modèles de l'activité experte. Thèse de doctorat en Psychologie. Université de Paris 8 (2012).Google Scholar
- Clot, Y. La fonction psychologique du travail. Presses Universitaires de France (1999).Google Scholar
- Daniellou, F. L'ergonomie dans la conduite de projets de conception de systèmes de travail. In P. Falzon (Ed.), Ergonomie Presses Universitaires de France (2004) (pp. 359--373).Google Scholar
- Daniellou, F. Le travail des prescriptions. Conférence inaugurale 36<sup>ème</sup> congrès de la SELF (2002).Google Scholar
- Darses, F. Analyse du processus d'argumentation dans une situation de reconception collective d'outillage. Le Travail Humain, (2006), 69, 317--348.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Falzon, P. Pour une ergonomie constructive. In Falzon, P. (coord.) Ergonomie constructive. Presses Universitaires de France (2013), 1--15.Google Scholar
- Hamayon, R. Jouer. Une étude anthropologique. Paris : La Découverte (2012).Google Scholar
- Hauret, D. L'autorité partagée pour mieux décider à bord du Rafale, Actes de la 12<sup>ème</sup> conférence internationale ERGO'IA 10, ACM Press (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hollnagel, E. (2004). Barriers and accident prevention. Aldershot, UK : Ashgate (2004).Google Scholar
- Leontiev, A. Activité, conscience, personnalité (G. Dupond, trad.). Editions du Progrès (1984). (Original publié 1975).Google Scholar
- Loup-Escande, E., Burkhardt, J.-M., & Richir, S. Anticiper et évaluer l'utilité dans la conception ergonomique des technologies émergentes : une revue. Le Travail Humain, (2012), 76, 27--55.Google Scholar
- Maline, J. Simuler le travail : une aide à la conduite de projet. Anact (1994).Google Scholar
- Mellon, N. Simulation organisationnelle : matérialiser la dématérialisation. Actes du 50ième Congrès de la SELF (2015).Google Scholar
- Nelson, J. Contribution à l'analyse prospective des usages dans les projets d'innovation. Thèse de doctorat en Ingénierie Mécanique. Arts & Métiers ParisTech (2011).Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R.L. Macks (Eds), Usability Inspection Methods. New York, John Wiley & Sons (1994). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rabardel, P. Les Hommes et les Technologies: approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Armand Colin (1995).Google Scholar
- Robert, J.-M. & Brangier, E. Prospective ergonomics: origin, goal, and prospects. Work, (2012), 41, 5235--5242.Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. The reflexive practitioner. How professionals think in action. Aldershot, UK : Arena (1996).Google Scholar
- Schumpeter, J. A. The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press (1934).Google Scholar
- Sternberg, R. The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal (1985), 18, 87--98.Google Scholar
- Theureau, J., & Pinsky, P. Paradoxe de l'ergonomie de conception et logiciel informatique. Revue des Conditions de Travail (1984), 9, 25--31.Google Scholar
- Van Belleghem, L. & Guerry, M-H. De la simulation organisationnelle à la simulation managériale. Actes du 51<sup>ème</sup> congrès de la SELF (2016).Google Scholar
- Van Belleghem, L. Réciprocité des enjeux de confiance au travail - Le cas des coursiers et de leur dispatcheur. Dans L. Karsenty (coord.) La confiance au travail. Octarès (2013) 53--75.Google Scholar
- Van Belleghem L. Simulation organisationnelle : innovation ergonomique pour innovation sociale. Dans M.-F. Dessaigne, V. Pueyo & P. Béguin (s/d), Innovation et Travail : Sens et valeurs du changement. Actes du 42ème congrès de la SELF (2012).Google Scholar
Recommendations
Tangible 3D tabletops: combining tangible tabletop interaction and 3D projection
NordiCHI '12: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through DesignIn this paper we present the tangible 3D tabletop and discuss the design potential of this novel interface. The tangible 3D tabletop combines tangible tabletop interaction with 3D projection in such a way that the tangible objects may be augmented with ...
ARCrowd - a tangible interface for interactive crowd simulation
IUI '11: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfacesManipulating a large virtual crowd in an interactive virtual reality environment is a challenging task due to the limitations of the traditional user interface. To address this problem, a tangible interface based on augmented reality (AR) technology is ...
Object, function, action for tangible interface design
GRAPHITE '04: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and South East AsiaIt is now possible to turn almost any object into an interface. What one must do, however is to explore the user's needs and perceptions in order to create the metaphors necessary for improved interaction. We have created a group of applications ...
Comments