Kaelan Doyle Myerscough
ABSTRACT
This paper explores the potential of using game jams to engage with game developers in order to address issues related to inclusivity in games. Based on extensive critical analysis of local cooperative games, we have identified a number of issues in relation to how the socio-technical system (software, hardware, cultural norms, etc.) casts female players in restricted roles. These findings were used as input into two game jams where participants were tasked with creating game concepts that would address the inclusivity issues we identified. In this process, we discovered that it is difficult to simultaneously operate on a critical reflective level of analysis at the same time as engaging in concrete creative work. Changing the mix of voices - by inviting designers known for inclusivity advocacy and drastically increasing the number of female participants - allowed us to maintain the intended focus on the underlying issues more effectively in the second workshop. This, however, came at the expense of silencing less advocacy-inclined participants.
- Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Fiksdahl-King, I., i Ramió, J.R., Jacobson, M. and Silverstein, M. 1977. A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
- Argyris, C. 1970. Intervention Theory and Method. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
- Avedon, E. 1981. The structural elements of games. The Psychology of Social Situations: Selected Readings. 11--17.Google Scholar
- Bardzell, J. 2008. Interaction Criticism: How to Do It. Interaction Culture. http://interactionculture.wordpress.com.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bryce, J. and Rutter, J. 2003. The gendering of computer gaming: experience and space. In Leisure Cultures: Investigations in Sport, Media, and Technology. S. Flemining and I. Jones, Eds. Leisure Studies Association, Eastbourne, UK. 3--22.Google Scholar
- Checkland, P. 1981. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
- De Witt, J. 2009. Castle Panic. Board game. Fireside Games.Google Scholar
- Eberhardt, R. 2016. No One Way to Jam: Game Jams for Creativity, Learning, Entertainment, and Research. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons, and Game Creation Events (Berkeley, CA, March 13, 2016), GJH&GC '16. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 34--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ehn, P. 1988. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum.Google Scholar
- Eladhari, M. P., and Ollila, E. M. I. 2012. Design for Research Results Experimental Prototyping and Play Testing. Simulation & Gaming 43, 3 (Jun. 2012), 391--412. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fallman, D. 2008. The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies, and Design Exploration. Design Issues 24, 3 (Jul. 2008), 4--18. Google Scholar
- Fernández-Vara, Clara. 2014. Introduction to Game Analysis. Routledge, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Fullerton, T., Chen, J., Santiago, K. Nelson, E. Diamante, V. & Meyers A. 2006. That Cloud Game: Dreaming (and Doing) Innovative Game Design. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Siggraph Symposium on Videogames (Boston, MA, July 29 -- 30, 2006). GRAPH '06. ACM, New York, NY.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fullerton, T. 2014. Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games, Third Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hillgren, P.A. 2013. Participatory design for social and public innovation: Living Labs as spaces for agonistic experiments and friendly hacking. Public and Collaborative: Exploring the Intersection of Design, Social Innovation and Public Policy, E. Manzini and E. Staszowski, Eds. 75--88.Google Scholar
- Jakobsson, M. 2011. The Achievement Machine: Understanding Xbox 360 Achievements in Gaming Practices. Game Studies: International Journal of Computer Games Research 11, 1 (Feb. 2011).Google Scholar
- Jakobsson, M. 2013. The Second Player-Investigating Asymmetrical Player Representations in Local Co-Operative Games. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2013: DeFragging Game Studies (Atlanta, GA, August 26 -- 29, 2013). Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
- Jakobsson, M. 2016. Achievements. In Debugging Game History: A Critical Lexicon. H. Lowood and R. Guins, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1--12.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, H. W. 2002. Lara Croft: Feminist Icon or Cyberbimbo? On the Limits of Textual Analysis. Game Studies: International Journal of Computer Games Research 2, 2 (Dec. 2002).Google Scholar
- Kultima, A. 2015. Defining Game Jam. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (Pacific Grove, CA, June 22 -- 25, 2015), FDG '15. Pacific Grove, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Lacey, K. 2008. Authoring the Other: Regarding Race and Gender in a Multicultural Adaptation of the Classic Fairytale "Cinderella." Doctoral Thesis. ProQuest Order Number: ProQuest Order No. 3335257, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
- Latour, Bruno. 1992. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change. W. Bijker and J. Law, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 225--259.Google Scholar
- Löwgren, J. and Stolterman, E. 2004. Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Myers, M.D. 1997. Qualitative research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21, 2 (Jun. 1997), 241--242. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nintendo EAD Group No. 3. 2004. The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords Adventures. Video game, Nintendo GameCube. Nintendo.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., and Stienstra, M. 2004. Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values 29, 1 (Jan. 2004), 30--63. Google Scholar
- Pirker, J. and Voll, K. 2015. Group forming processes-experiences and best practice from different game jams. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (Pacific Grove, CA, June 22 -- 25, 2015), FDG '15. Pacific Grove, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Royse, P., Lee J., Undrahbuyan B., Hopson M., and Consalvo M. 2007. Women and Games: Technologies of the Gendered Self. New Media & Society 9, 4 (Aug. 2007), 555--576. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Scott, M.J. and Ghinea, G. 2013. Promoting game accessibility: Experiencing an induction on inclusive design practice at the global games jam. In Proceedings of the Inaugural Workshop on the Global Games Jam (Chania, Greece, May 14 -- 17, 2013), IWGGJ '13. SASDG, Santa Cruz, CA, 17--20.Google Scholar
- Shaw, A. 2015. Gaming at the Edge: Sexuality and Gender at the Margins of Gamer Culture. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shi, T. and Tambasco, B. 2015. Insight: Exploring Hidden Roles in Collaborative Play. Press Start 2, 2 (Nov. 2015), 35--56.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. 2002. Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems. 14, 2 (2002), 91--105.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Taylor, T. L. 2003. Multiple pleasures: Women and online gaming. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 9, 1 (Mar. 2003), 21--46. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wajcman, J. 2010. Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge journal of economics 34, 1 (Jan. 2010), 143--152. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Williams, D., Consalvo, M., Caplan, S., and Yee, N. 2009. Looking for gender: Gender roles and behaviors among online gamers. Journal of Communication 59, 4 (Dec. 2009), 700--725. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yin-Poole, W. 2012. Borderlands 2: Gearbox reveals the Mechromancer's 'girlfriend mode'. Eurogamer. Available from: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-08-13-borderlands-2-gearbox-reveals-the-mechromancers-girlfriend-mode; accessed 20 July 2014.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Evenson, S. 2007. Research Through Design As a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, CA, April 30 -- May 03, 2007), CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493--502. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Jamming for allies: finding a formula for inclusive design exploration collaborations
Recommendations
BoomChaCha: A Rhythm-based, Physical Role-Playing Game that Facilitates Cooperation among Players
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe designed a new genre of gaming that is rhythm-based, cooperative, physical and involves role-playing. In the game, three players as a team combat monsters by waving physical weapons on certain beats of the background music. The game requires a ...
Playful Game Jams: Guidelines for Designed Outcomes
IE2014: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive EntertainmentGame jams are social events involving the integration of various game making disciplines (e.g. programming, art, design) to make games under constraints, such as a short fixed time. Game jams are emerging in areas such as research, education, and ...
Game idea jam for sport and exertion games
CHI PLAY '14: Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in playGame Jams have successfully been introduced to the CHI Community during the past two years. Game developers meet to plan, design, and create one or more games within a short time span (ranging from 24 to 48 hours). We propose a Game Idea Jam focusing on ...
Comments