skip to main content
10.1145/3064663.3064708acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Engaging Children Using a Digital Living Media System

Published:10 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital living media systems consist of living organisms combined with electronic components and can reflect or represent information to users (e.g., as an ambient display). We have developed, Rafigh, a digital living media system that utilizes the growth rate of a living mushroom colony to reflect users' digital application use. We used Rafigh to study how digital living media systems can 1) motivate children to use therapeutic and/or learning digital applications, and 2) increase communication and collaboration in the home setting. We conducted two in situ case studies with four children and their caregivers which showed that the system successfully motivated two of the children to use target applications and created communication and collaboration in the home setting. Additionally, the two children were not deterred by the slow changes in the system. We discuss the implications for using digital living media systems to engage and motivate children through dynamics of caring and responsibility.

References

  1. Stavros Antifakos and Bernt Schiele. 2003. LaughingLily: Using Flower as a Real-World Information Display. In Proceedings of UbiComp 2003, vol. 2864, 161--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Roy Ascott. 2007. Telematic Embrace: Visionary Theories of Art, Technology, and Consciousness. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Samit Bhattacharya, Debasis Samanta, and Anupam Basu. 2008. Performance models for automatic evaluation of virtual scanning keyboards. IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 16, 5: 510--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Olle Bälter, Olov Engwall, Anne-Marie Öster, and Hedvig Kjellström. 2005. Wizard-of-Oz test of ARTUR: A computer-based speech training system with articulation correction. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2005, 36--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shaowen Bardzell, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jodi Forlizzi, John Zimmerman, and John Antanitis. 2012. Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12), 288--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. David H. Barlow, Matthew K Nock and Michel Hersen. 2008. Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Soumitra Bhat. 2010. TouchTone: an electronic musical instrument for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. In Proceedings of TEI 2010. 305--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Freda J. Bergesen. 1989. The effects of pet facilitated therapy on the self-esteem and socialisation of primary school children. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marc Böhlen and Michael Mateas. 1998. Office Plant# 1: Intimate space and contemplative entertainment. Leonardo 31, 5: 345--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Philipp Bolliger and Benedikt Ostermaier. 2007. Koubachi: A mobile phone widget to enable affective communication with indoor plants. In Proceedings of MIRW 2007, 63--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Melissa M. Calvert. 1989. Human-pet interaction and loneliness: a test of concepts from Roy's adaptation model. Nursing Science Quarterly 2, 4: 194--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Scott Carter, Jennifer Mankoff, Scott R. Klemmer, and Tara Matthews. 2008. Exiting the cleanroom: On ecological validity and ubiquitous computing. Human-- Computer Interaction 23, 1: 47--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sunny Consolvo, David W. McDonald, Tammy Toscos, Mike Y. Chen, Jon Froehlich, Beverly Harrison, Predrag Klasnja, Anthony LaMarca, Louis LeGrand, Ryan Libby, Ian Smith and james A. Landay. 2008. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08), 17971806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Adrian D. Cheok, Roger T. Kok, Chuen Tan, Owen N. Fernando, Tim Merritt, and Janyn Y. P. Sen. 2008. Empathetic living media. In Proceedings of DIS 2008. 465--473. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jacqueline T. Chien, Francois V. Guimbretière, Tauhidur Rahman, Geri Gay, and Mark Matthews. (2015). Biogotchi!: An Exploration of Plant-Based Information Displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1139--1144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Douglas Easterly. 2004. Bio-Fi: inverse biotelemetry projects. In Proceedings of MM 2004, 182--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Robert Faludi, Kate Hartman, and Kati London. 2006. Botanicalls. Retrieved November 2015 from http://www.botanicalls.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ylva Fernaeus, and Jakob Tholander. 2006. Finding design qualities in a tangible programming space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 447--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Owen N. Fernando, Adrian D. Cheok, Tim Merritt, Roshan L. Peiris, Charith L. Fernando, Nimesha Ranasinghe, and Kasun Karunanayaka. 2009. Babbage cabbage: Biological empathetic media. In VRIC Laval Virtual Proceedings, 363--366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, and Alyssa Alcorn. 2012. Challenges, opportunities and future perspectives in including children with disabilities in the design of interactive technology. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC'12). 367--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, Wendy KeayBright, and Helen Pain. 2012. Interpreting input from children: a designerly approach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), 2377--2386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Erich Fromm. 2000. The Art of Loving: The Centennial Edition. A&C Black.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Joan Greenbaum and Morten Kyng. (eds.) (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Foad Hamidi and Melanie Baljko. 2014. Rafigh: A Living Media Interface for Speech Intervention. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1817--1820 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Katie Hafner. 2000. What Do You Mean, 'It's Just Like a Real Dog?': As robot pets and dolls multiply, children react in new ways to things that are almost alive. The New York Times, Retrieved November 14, 2015 from http://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/25/technology/whatyou-mean-it-s-just-like-real-dog-robot-pets-dollsmultiply-chilren-react.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. The three paradigms of HCI. In Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayden Harvey, Molly Havard, David Magnus, Mildred K. Cho, and Ingmar H. Riedel-Kruse. 2014. Innocent Fun or 'Microslavery'? An Ethical Analysis of Biotic Games. Hastings Center Report 44, no. 6, 3846.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Bart Hengeveld, Caroline Hummels, Kees Overbeeke, Riny Voort, R., Hans van Balkom, and Jan de Moor. 2009. Tangibles for toddlers learning language. In Proceedings of TEI 2009, 161--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Holstius, D., Kembel, J., Hurst, A., Wan, P. H., and Forlizzi, J. 2004. Infotropism: living and robotic plants as interactive displays. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, 215221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Hourcade, J. P., Garzotto, F., Rozga, A., Tentori, M. E., Markopoulos, P., Pares, N., Good, J., Pain, H., and Alper, M. 2014. Supporting children with complex communication needs. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14), 119--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Juan P. Hourcade, Stacy R. Williams, Ellen A. Miller, Kelsey E. Huebner, and Lucas J. Liang. 2013. Evaluation of tablet apps to encourage social interaction in children with autism spectrum disorders. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 3197--3206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bosse Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stephane Conversy, Evans, Helen Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Bjorn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI'03), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ruituo Huai, Junqing Yang, Hui Wang, and Xuecheng Su. 2009. A new robo-animals navigation method guided by the remote control. In Proceedings of BMEI 2009, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Sungjae Hwang, Kibeom Lee, and Woonseung Yeo. (2010). My green pet: A current-based interactive plant for children. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 210213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Bashkim Isai and Stephen Viller. 2010. Meet Eater: affectionate computing, social networks and humanplant interaction. In Proceedings of OzCHI 2010, 414415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Hiroshi Ishii. 2008. Tangible bits: beyond pixels. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, xv-xxv. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Satoshi Kuribayashi and Akira Wakita. 2006. PlantDisplay: turning houseplants into ambient display. In Proceedings of SIGCHI ACE 2006, Article 40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Maarten H. Lamers and Wim van Eck. 2012. Why simulate hybrid biological-digital games. In Proceedings Applications of Evolutionary Computation 2012, 214--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan H. Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2010. Research methods in human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Seung A. Lee, Engin Bumbacher, Alice M. Chung, Nate Cira, Byron Walker, Ji Y. Park, Barry Starr, Paulo Blikstein, and Ingmar H. Riedel-Kruse. 2015. Trap it!: A Playful Human-Biology Interaction for a Museum Installation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'15), 2593--2602. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Boris M. Levinson. 2001. The child and his pet: A world of non-verbal communication. Ethnology and Non-Verbal Communication in Mental Health 12, 4: 63--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Rocci Luppicini. (Ed.). 2008. Handbook of research on technoethics. IGI Global. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Andrew Manches, Claire O'Malley, and Steve Benford. 2009. Physical manipulation: Evaluating the potential for tangible designs. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI'09), 77--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R. Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. D. 2010. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '10), 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Richard E. Mayer. 2014. Computer Games for Learning: An Evidence-Based Approach. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. John Pollak, Geri Gay, Sahara Byrne, Emily Wagner, Daniela Retelny, and Lee Humphreys. 2010. It's time to eat! Using mobile games to promote healthy eating. Pervasive Computing, 9(3), 21--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Ivan Poupyrev, Philipp Schoessler, Jonas Loh, and Munehiko Sato. 2012. Botanicus Interacticus: interactive plants technology. ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Emerging Technologies, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Reeves, B and Nass, C. 1999. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Yvonne Rogers. 2011. Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory. Interactions 18, 4: 58--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Ben Salem, Adrian Cheok, and Adria Bassaganyes. 2009. BioMedia for Entertainment. Entertainment Computing, 232--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Hirokata Sato, Christopher W. Berry, Brendan E. Casey, Gabriel Lavella, Ying Yao, John M. VandenBrooks, and Michel M. Maharbiz, 2008. A cyborg beetle: insect flight control through an implantable, tetherless microsystem. In Proceedings of MEMS 2008, 164--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Jinsil H Seo, Annie Sungkajun, and Jinkyo Suh. 2015. Touchology: Towards Interactive Plant Design for Children with Autism and Older Adults in Senior Housing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15), 893--898. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Takanori Shibata, Teruaki Mitsui, Kazuyoshi Wada, Akihiro Touda, Takayuki Kumasaka, Kazumi Tagami, and Kazuo Tanie, K. 2001. Mental commit robot and its application to therapy of children. In Proceedings of Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, 1053--1058.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Cameron Steer, Simon Robinson, and Matt Jones. 2015. Growth, Change and Decay: Plants and Interaction Possibilities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2037--2042. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Kelly Tai, Stefanie Blain, and Tom Chau. 2008. A review of emerging access technologies for individuals with severe motor impairments. Assistive Technology 20, 4: 204--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Sherry Turkle, Cynthia Breazeal, Olivia Dasté, and Brian Scassellati. 2006. Encounters with kismet and cog: Children respond to relational artifacts. Digital Media: Transformations in Human Communication, 120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Frank Vetere, Martin R. Gibbs, Jesper Kjeldskov, Steve Howard, Florian F. Mueller, Sonja Pedell, Karen Mecoles, and Marcus Bunyan. 2005. Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05), 471--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Klara Vicsi, Peter Roach, Anne-Marie Öster, Zdravko Kacic and Peter Barczikay. 2001. A multimedia, multilingual teaching and training system for children with speech disorders. International Journal of Speech Technology 3, 289--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Kazuyoshi Wada and Takanori Shibata. 2007. Living with seal robots-its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23, 5: 972--980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Cindy C. Wilson. 1991. The pet as an anxiolytic intervention. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 179, 8: 482--489.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Craig Wisneski, Hiroshi Ishii, Andrew Dahley, Matt Gorbet, Scott Brave, Brygg Ullmer, and Paul Yarin. 1998. Ambient displays: Turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. In Cooperative buildings: Integrating information, organization, and architecture, 22--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Shaohua Xu, Sanjiv K. Talwar, Emerson S. Hawley, Lei Li, and John K. Chapin. 2004. A multi-channel telemetry system for brain microstimulation in freely roaming animals. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 133, 1: 57--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI'07), 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. John Zimmerman and Jodi Forlizzi. 2008. The role of design artifacts in design theory construction. Artifact 2, 1: 41--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Oren Zuckerman, Saeed Arida, and Mitch Resnick. 2005. Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital Montessori-inspired manipulatives. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI'05), 859--868. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Engaging Children Using a Digital Living Media System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
      June 2017
      1444 pages
      ISBN:9781450349222
      DOI:10.1145/3064663

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '17 Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader