skip to main content
10.1145/3064857.3079113acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Best Way to Go?: Intriguing Citizens to Investigate What Is Behind Smart City Technologies

Published: 10 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents an interactive street sign that aims to engage urban dwellers in the discussion surrounding the implications of smart cities. Based on either citizen input or an algorithm that rates the walkability and security of a location based on geo-tagged pictures, this signpost can indicate the direction with the highest walkability. By means of collecting citizen opinions and using this algorithm, this street sign represents an attempt to make politics that are involved when designing an application visible at public places and thereby make passers-by reflect on smart city applications.

References

[1]
Hannah Arendt. 1958/1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://sduk.us/afterwork/arendt_the_human_condi tion.pdf
[2]
Andy Boucher. 2016. The Form Design of the Datacatcher: A Research Prototype. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 595--606.
[3]
Alvin Chua, Ernesto Marcheggiani, Loris Servillo, & Andrew Vande Vande Moere. 2015. FlowSampler: Visual Analysis of Urban Flows in Geolocated Social Media Data. In M. L. Aiello & D. McFarland (Eds.), Social Informatics: SocInfo 2014 International Workshops, Barcelona, Spain, November 11, 2014, Revised Selected Papers. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 5--7.
[4]
Sandy Claes and Andrew Vande Moere. 2015. The Role of Tangible Interaction in Exploring Information on Public Visualization Displays. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201--207.
[5]
Connectors Society (n.d.). Dept. of Public Spaces. Retrieved from http://www.theconnectorssociety.com/dops/
[6]
Joe Cortright. (2009, August). Walking the Walk: How Walkability Raises Home Values in U.S. Cities. Washington, DC: CEOs for Cities. Retrieved from: http://communitywealth.org/sites/clone.communitywealth.org/files/downloads/report-cortright.pdf
[7]
William Gaver, Andy Boucher, Nadine Jarvis, David Cameron, Mark Hauenstein, Sarah Pennington, John Bowers, James Pike, Robin Beitra, and Liliana Ovalle. 2016. The Datacatcher: Batch Deployment and Documentation of 130 Location-Aware, Mobile Devices That Put Sociopolitically-Relevant Big Data in People's Hands: Polyphonic Interpretation at Scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1597--1607.
[8]
Nadav Hochman, & Lev Manovich. 2013. Zooming into an Instagram City: Reading the local through social media. First Monday, 18(7). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/vie w/4711/3698
[9]
Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaité, Yvonne Rogers, and Jon Bird. 2014. What Chalk and Tape Can Tell Us: Lessons Learnt for Next Generation Urban Displays. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '14), Sven Gehring (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Pages 130, 6 pages.
[10]
Bruno Latour. 1999. Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
[11]
Cathy O'Neil. 2016. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group (NY).
[12]
Tanya Nitins, & Christy Collis. 2013. 'Grounding the Internet': Categorising the Geographies of Locative Media. Media International Australia, 146(1), 69-- 78.
[13]
Daniele Quercia, Luca Maria Aiello, Rossano Schifanella, and Adam Davies. 2015. The Digital Life of Walkable Streets. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '15). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 875--884.
[14]
Jessca Schoffelen, Sandy Claes, Liesbeth Huybrechts, Sarah Martens, Alvin Chua, & Andrew Vande Moere, A. V. 2015. Visualising things. Perspectives on how to make things public through visualisation. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 11(3--4), 179192.
[15]
Andrew Vande Moere, & Dan Hill. 2012. Designing for the Situated and Public Visualization of Urban Data. Journal of Urban Technology, 19(2), 25--46.
[16]
Walkonomics. n.d. About. Retrieved from http://www.walkonomics.com/about

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Building Adaptable Dashboards for Smart Cities: Design and EvaluationProgramming and Computer Software10.1134/S036176882208007248:8(534-551)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2022
  • (2019)A Review of Research on Participation in Democratic Decision-Making Presented at SIGCHI Conferences. Toward an Improved Trading Zone Between Political Science and HCIProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33592413:CSCW(1-29)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2019

Index Terms

  1. Best Way to Go?: Intriguing Citizens to Investigate What Is Behind Smart City Technologies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '17 Companion: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems
    June 2017
    424 pages
    ISBN:9781450349918
    DOI:10.1145/3064857
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 June 2017

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. algorithm
    2. smart city
    3. tangible design
    4. transparency

    Qualifiers

    • Work in progress

    Conference

    DIS '17
    Sponsor:
    DIS '17: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2017
    June 10 - 14, 2017
    Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    Acceptance Rates

    DIS '17 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate 107 of 487 submissions, 22%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Upcoming Conference

    DIS '25
    Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 5 - 9, 2025
    Funchal , Portugal

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Building Adaptable Dashboards for Smart Cities: Design and EvaluationProgramming and Computer Software10.1134/S036176882208007248:8(534-551)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2022
    • (2019)A Review of Research on Participation in Democratic Decision-Making Presented at SIGCHI Conferences. Toward an Improved Trading Zone Between Political Science and HCIProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33592413:CSCW(1-29)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2019

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media