skip to main content
10.1145/3067695.3075982acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Using desirability functions for many-objective optimization of a hybrid car controller

Published:15 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work we investigated the concept of desirability functions for a many-objective optimization of a hybrid car controller with five objectives from different domains. We study this problem from the perspective of preference expression. Specifically we are looking at the impact of wrongly defined desirabilities and how this can be corrected using a Graphical User Interface (GUI). Overall we find that a desirability-based many-objective optimization approach could be well suited for real-world problems with objectives from many domains as it is becoming more and more common in industrial settings.

References

  1. Dimo Brockhoff, Johannes Bader, Lothar Thiele, and Eckart Zitzler. 2013. Directed multiobjective optimization based on the weighted hypervolume indicator. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 20, 5--6 (2013), 291--317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. EC Harrington. 1965. The desirability function. Industrial quality control 21, 10 (1965), 494--498.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben Paechter, RC Rankin, Andrew Cumming, and Terence C Fogarty. 1998. Timetabling the classes of an entire university with an evolutionary algorithm. In International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 865--874. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tobias Rodemann, Kaname Narukawa, Michael Fischer, and Mohammed Awada. 2015. Many-objective optimization of a hybrid car controller. In European Conference on the Applications of Evolutionary Computation. Springer, 593--603.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Tobias Wagner and Heike Trautmann. 2010. Integration of preferences in hypervolume-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms by means of desirability functions. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on 14, 5 (2010), 688--701. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K Wonggasem, T Wagner, H Trautmann, D Biermann, and C Weihs. 2013. Multi-objective Optimization of Hard Turning of AISI 6150 Using PCA-based Desirability Index for Correlated Objectives. Procedia CIRP 12 (2013), 13--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GECCO '17: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
    July 2017
    1934 pages
    ISBN:9781450349390
    DOI:10.1145/3067695

    Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 July 2017

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

    Upcoming Conference

    GECCO '24
    Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
    July 14 - 18, 2024
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader