skip to main content
10.1145/3077136.3080667acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Finally, a Downloadable Test Collection of Tweets

Published: 07 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Due to Twitter's terms of service that forbid redistribution of content, creating publicly downloadable collections of tweets for research purposes has been a perpetual problem for the research community. Some collections are distributed by making available the ids of the tweets that comprise the collection and providing tools to fetch the actual content; this approach has scalability limitations. In other cases, evaluation organizers have set up APIs that provide access to collections for specific tasks, without exposing the underlying content. This is a workable solution, but difficult to sustain over the long term since someone has to maintain the APIs. We have noticed that the non-profit Internet Archive has been making available for public download captures of the so-called Twitter "spritzer" stream, which is the same source as the Tweets2013 collection used in the TREC 2013 and 2014 Microblog Tracks. We analyzed both datasets in terms of content overlap and retrieval baselines to show that the Internet Archive data can serve as a drop-in replacement for the Tweets2013 collection, thereby providing the research community with, finally, a downloadable collection of tweets. Beyond this finding, we also study the impact of tweet deletions over time and how they affect the test collections.

References

[1]
Allan Hanbury, Henning Müller, Krisztian Balog, Torben Brodt, Gordon V. Cormack, Ivan Eggel, Tim Gollub, Frank Hopfgartner, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Noriko Kando, Anastasia Krithara, Jimmy Lin, Simon Mercer, and Martin Potthast. 2015. Evaluation-as-a-Service: Overview and Outlook. arXiv:1512.07454.
[2]
Donna Harman. 2011. Information Retrieval Evaluation. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
[3]
Jimmy Lin and Miles Efron. 2013. Evaluation as a Service for Information Retrieval. SIGIR Forum, Vol. 47, 2 (2013), 8--14.
[4]
Jimmy Lin and Miles Efron. 2013. Overview of the TREC-2013 Microblog Track. TREC.
[5]
Richard McCreadie, Ian Soboroff, Jimmy Lin, Craig Macdonald, Iadh Ounis, and Dean McCullough. 2012. On Building a Reusable Twitter Corpus. In SIGIR. 1113--1114.
[6]
Iadh Ounis, Craig Macdonald, Jimmy Lin, and Ian Soboroff. 2011. Overview of the TREC-2011 Microblog Track. TREC.
[7]
Jiaul H. Paik and Jimmy Lin. 2016. Retrievability in API-Based "Evaluation as a Service" ICTIR. 91--94.
[8]
Ellen M. Voorhees, Jimmy Lin, and Miles Efron. 2014. On Run Diversity in "Evaluation as a Service". SIGIR. 959--962.
[9]
Lidan Wang, Jimmy Lin, and Donald Metzler. 2011. A Cascade Ranking Model for Efficient Ranked Retrieval SIGIR. 105--114.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)LongEval-Retrieval: French-English Dynamic Test Collection for Continuous Web Search EvaluationProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3539618.3591921(3086-3094)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Migration Policies and Immigrants’ Language Acquisition in EU‐15: Evidence from TwitterPopulation and Development Review10.1111/padr.1257449:3(469-497)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2023
  • (2022)EdgeMan: Ensuring Real-Time Service for Containerized Edge Systems2022 18th International Conference on Mobility, Sensing and Networking (MSN)10.1109/MSN57253.2022.00049(231-238)Online publication date: Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Finally, a Downloadable Test Collection of Tweets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '17: Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
    August 2017
    1476 pages
    ISBN:9781450350228
    DOI:10.1145/3077136
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 August 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. microblog retrieval
    2. trec
    3. twitter

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SIGIR '17
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGIR '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 78 of 362 submissions, 22%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)LongEval-Retrieval: French-English Dynamic Test Collection for Continuous Web Search EvaluationProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3539618.3591921(3086-3094)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Migration Policies and Immigrants’ Language Acquisition in EU‐15: Evidence from TwitterPopulation and Development Review10.1111/padr.1257449:3(469-497)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2023
    • (2022)EdgeMan: Ensuring Real-Time Service for Containerized Edge Systems2022 18th International Conference on Mobility, Sensing and Networking (MSN)10.1109/MSN57253.2022.00049(231-238)Online publication date: Dec-2022
    • (2022)Role of twitter user profile features in retweet prediction for big data streamsMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-12815-181:19(27309-27338)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2022
    • (2022)Reproducing Personalised Session Search Over the AOL Query LogAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_42(627-640)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Finding Trustworthy Users: Twitter Sentiment Towards US Presidential Candidates in 2016 and 2020Intelligent Systems and Applications10.1007/978-3-030-82196-8_59(804-821)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2021
    • (2019)It Is an Equal Failing to Trust Everybody and to Trust NobodyACM Transactions on Internet Technology10.1145/333885519:4(1-20)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2019
    • (2018)A longitudinal assessment of the persistence of twitter datasetsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2402669:8(974-984)Online publication date: 14-May-2018
    • (2017)EveTAR: building a large-scale multi-task test collection over Arabic tweetsInformation Retrieval Journal10.1007/s10791-017-9325-721:4(307-336)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2017

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media