skip to main content
10.1145/3077331.3077340acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Enabling Change Exploration: Vision Paper

Published:14 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data and metadata suffer many different kinds of change: values are inserted, deleted or updated; entities appear and disappear; properties are added or re-purposed, etc. Explicitly recognizing, exploring, and evaluating such change can alert to changes in data ingestion procedures, can help assess data quality, and can improve the general understanding of the dataset and its behavior over time. We propose a data model-independent framework to formalize such change. Our change-cube enables exploration and discovery of such changes to reveal dataset behavior over time.

References

  1. Ziawasch Abedjan, Lukasz Golab, and Felix Naumann. 2015. Profiling relational data: a survey. VLDB Journal 24, 4 (2015), 557--581. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Charu C. Aggarwal. 2007. Data streams: models and algorithms. Vol. 31. Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Juan M. Ale and Gustavo H. Rossi. 2000. An approach to discovering temporal association rules. In Proc. of SAC. 294--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Peter Buneman, Sanjeev Khanna, and Tan Wang-Chiew. 2001. Why and where: A characterization of data provenance. In Proc. of the International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT). 316--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tamraparni Dasu, Theodore Johnson, and Amit Marathe. 2006. Database Exploration Using Database Dynamics. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 29, 2 (2006), 43--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tamraparni Dasu, Theodore Johnson, S. Muthukrishnan, and Vladislav Shkapenyuk. 2002. Mining Database Structure; Or, How to Build a Data Quality Browser. In Proc. of SIGMOD. 240--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Stratos Idreos, Olga Papaemmanouil, and Surajit Chaudhuri. 2015. Overview of Data Exploration Techniques. In Proc. of SIGMOD. 277--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yannis Roussakis, Ioannis Chrysakis, Kostas Stefanidis, Giorgos Flouris, and Yannis Stavrakas. 2015. A flexible framework for understanding the dynamics of evolving RDF datasets. In Proc. of ISWC. 495--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Praveen Seshadri, Miron Livny, and Raghu Ramakrishnan. 1995. SEQ: A Model for Sequence Databases. In Proc. of ICDE. 232--239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Richard T. Snodgrass. 2000. Developing Time-Oriented Database Applications in SQL. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Michael Stillger, Guy M. Lohman, Volker Markl, and Mokhtar Kandil. 2001. LEO -- DB2's LEarning Optimizer. In Proc. of VLDB. 19--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jürgen Umbrich, Boris Villazón-Terrazas, and Michael Hausenblas. 2010. Dataset Dynamics Compendium: A Comparative Study. In Proc. of the International Workshop on Consuming Linked Data (COLD). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ExploreDB'17: Proceedings of the ExploreDB'17
    May 2017
    36 pages
    ISBN:9781450346740
    DOI:10.1145/3077331

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate11of21submissions,52%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader