skip to main content
10.1145/3077839.3077847acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Data Driven Pre-cooling Framework for Energy Cost Optimization in Commercial Buildings

Published:16 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Commercial buildings consume significant amount of energy. Facility managers are increasingly grappling with the problem of reducing their buildings' peak power, overall energy consumption and energy bills. In this paper, we first develop an optimization framework -- based on a gray box model for zone thermal dynamics -- to determine a pre-cooling strategy that simultaneously shifts the peak power to low energy tariff regimes, and reduces both the peak power and overall energy consumption by exploiting the flexibility in a building's thermal comfort range. We then evaluate the efficacy of the pre-cooling optimization framework by applying it to building management system (BMS) data, spanning several days, obtained from a large commercial building located in northern Australia. The results from simulations show that optimal pre-cooling reduces peak power by over 50%, energy consumption by up to 30% and energy bills by up to 37%. Next, to enable ease of use of our framework, we also propose a shortest path based heuristic algorithm for solving the optimization problem and show that it has comparable performance with the optimal solution. Finally, we describe an application of the proposed optimization framework for developing countries to reduce the dependency on expensive fossil fuels, which are often used as a source for energy backup. We conclude by highlighting our real world deployment of the optimal pre-cooling framework on the IBM Bluemix cloud. Our pre-cooling methodology, based on the gray box optimization framework, incurs no capital expense and relies on data readily available from a BMS, thus enabling facility managers to take informed decisions for improving the energy and cost footprints of their buildings.

References

  1. United Nations Environment Programme. Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative. www.unep.org/sbci/AboutSBCI/Background.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning. http://eex.gov.au/technologies/heating-ventilation-and-air-conditioning/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. P-Lombard, J. Ortiz, and C. Pout. A Review on Buildings Energy Consumption Information. Energy and Buildings, 40(3):394--398, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Property Council of Australia. Survey of Operating Costs: Office Buildings. https://equella.rmit.edu.au/rmit/items/de309be5-940e-a69e-81f0-5b9e5263f48e/1/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. V. Chandan, A. Vishwanath, M. Zhang, and S. Kalyanaraman. Short Paper: Data Driven Pre-cooling for Peak Demand Reduction in Commercial Buildings. In Proc. ACM BuildSys, South Korea, Nov 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Thermal Comfort in Commercial Buildings. http://soer.justice.tas.gov.au/2003/indicator/3/index.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. IPOPT optimization solver. https://projects.coin-or.org/Ipopt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. K. Wilkins and M. H. Hosni. Plug Load Design Factors. Ashrae Journal, 53(5):30, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Honeywell Carbon Dioxide Sensor.www.kele.com/gas-and-specialty-sensors/c7232.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Air VelocityTransmitters. www.kele.com/flow/ee65-and-ee66-series.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Wang and Z. Ma. Supervisory and Optimal Control of Building HVAC Systems: A Review. HVAC&R Research, 14(1):3--32, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. E. Braun. Reducing Energy Costs And Peak Electrical Demand Through Optimal Control Of Building Thermal Storage. ASHRAE Transactions, 96(2):876--887, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. I. Andresen and M. J. Brandemuehl. Heat Storage in Building Thermal Mass: A Parametric Study. ASHRAE Transactions, 98(1):910--918, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Xu, P. Haves, M. A. Piette, and J. E. Braun. Peak Demand Reduction from Pre-Cooling with Zone Temperature Reset in an Office Building. In Proc. ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, USA, Aug 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. P. Xu et al. Demand Shifting With Thermal Mass In Large Commercial Buildings In A California Hot Climate Zone. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Technical Report LBNL-3898E,Jun 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. E. Braun. Load Control Using Building Thermal Mass. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 125:292--301, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. EnergyPlus. https://energyplus.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Bacher and H. Madsen. Identifying Suitable Models for the Heat Dynamics of Buildings. Energy and Buildings, 43(7):1511--1522, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. F. Amara, K. Agbossou, A. Cardenas, Y. Dube, and S. Kelouwani. Comparison and Simulation of Building Thermal Models for Effective Energy Management. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, 6:95--112, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. P. Radecki and B. Hencey. Online Building Thermal Parameter Estimation via Unscented Kalman Filtering. In Proc. ACM American Control Conference, Canada, Jun 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. O. Tsakiridis, D. Sklavounos, E. Zervas, and J. Stonham. A Comfort-Aware Energy Efficient HVAC System Based on the Subspace Identification Method. Journal of Energy, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. S. Privara, J. Åăiroká, L. Ferkl, and J. Cigler. Model Predictive Control of a Building Heating System: The First Experience. Energy and Buildings, (2):564--572,2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. E. Braun and N. Chaturvedi. An Inverse Gray-Box Model for Transient Building Load Prediction. (1):73--99, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. Wang and X. Xu. Simplified Building Model for Transient Thermal Performance Estimation Using GA-Based Parameter Identification. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, (4):419--432, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. P. R. Armstrong, S. B. Leeb, and L. K. Norford. Control with Building Mass-Part I: Thermal Response Model. Transactions-American Society of Heating Regrigerating and Air Condioning Engineers, (1):449, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. C. K. Wilkins and M. H. Hosni. Plug Load Design Factors Response. ASHRAE Journal, (6):24--24, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. P. X. Gao and S. Keshav. Optimal Personal Comfort Management Using SPOT+. In Proc. ACM BuildSys, Italy, Nov 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Saving Money by Understanding Demand Charges on Your Electric Bill. http://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/htmlpubs/htm00712373/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Scott et al. PreHeat: Controlling Home Heating Using Occupancy Prediction. In Proc. ACM UbiComp, China, Sep 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. A. Vishwanath et al. Using Renewables to Reduce Peak Demand: Lessons from an Australian Experience. In Proc. IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Asia, Thailand, Nov 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. F. Lorenz and G. Masy. Méthode d'évaluation de l'économie d'énergie apportée par l'intermittence de chauffage dans les bâtiments. Traitement par differences finies d'un model a deux constantes de temps, Report No. GM820130-01. Faculte des Sciences Appliquees, University de Liege, Liege, Belgium, 1982 (in French).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Dijkstra's Algorithm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dijkstra's_algorithm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. H. Khadilkar et al. DC Picogrids as Power Backups for Office Buildings. In IEEE SmartGridComm, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. B. K. Sovacool. Valuing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Nuclear Power: A Critical Survey. Energy Policy, 36(8):2950--2963, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. The Weather Company. http://www.theweathercompany.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Holt-Winters Triple Exponential Smoothing. www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pmc/section4/pmc435.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    e-Energy '17: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Future Energy Systems
    May 2017
    388 pages
    ISBN:9781450350365
    DOI:10.1145/3077839

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    © 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

    Upcoming Conference

    E-Energy '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader